Advanced ESL Writing
October 5, 2014 “An eye for an eye”, a concept which was fashioned from Hammurabi’s code, is a dated gesture which can be compared to the desire to enforce the death penalty. Nowadays, the issue of the death penalty has become unavoidable because of the on-going national debates that have grabbed the public eye. On one hand, people who oppose the death penalty state that it is inhumane and that it does not affect the crime rate. In addition, the cost of a public execution is outrageously high. On the other hand, many have argued that the death penalty corrects the injustice, prevents criminals from committing more crimes, and gives closure to the families of the victims. Within that said, there are three reason why the death penalty should be against the law. First of all, people who support the death penalty state that it is the only way for criminals to right the wrong. Also, performing the death penalty offers retribution to the victim’s family. However, it is very inhumane for the government to take a human being’s life away. It diminishes the sanctity of human life and takes away one’s chance of changing. Additionally, performing the death penalty does not get back whatever the victims have lost. The death penalty instills fear not to commit crimes. Supporters claim that performing the death penalty will result in the lower crime rate. However, according to a “study of criminal minds” at the University of Pittsburgh, punishing criminals with the death penalty does not result in a lower rate of crime (Lawrence 268). Furthermore, studies showed an inflation of crime in states that executed their prisoners when compared to states which do not. The saying, “once a criminal, always a criminal”, illustrates our bias about criminals and our opinion that people do not change. Criminals will only be released to commit more crimes. Also, it will offer closure for the victim’s families and allow them to move on. Ultimately, one cannot put a price on the cost of justice. However, performing the death penalty costs more to execute people humanely than it does to feed and house them for life. According to studies at Harvard University “Execution of Criminals”, evidence shows that it costs one million dollars for a single humane execution (Bowden 567). Now, you can see that the death penalty should be against the law. It does not respect the value of human life and the victim’s family does not get anything out of it. It also does not result in a lower rate of crime. Moreover, it leads to higher rate of crime. In addition, the cost of an execution is higher than it is to keep criminals in prison for life. Many have argued that people do not change easily and not everyone deserve a second chance; however, at least people who are willing to change and right the wrongful action deserve a second chance. After all, victims and criminals are same human being as we all are.
Work Cited
Lawrence, Jenkins Criminal Minds. Pittsburgh: Penguin, 2005. Print.
Bowden, Ralph. The Execution. Boston: Bruins, 2003. Print
Cited: Lawrence, Jenkins Criminal Minds. Pittsburgh: Penguin, 2005. Print. Bowden, Ralph. The Execution. Boston: Bruins, 2003. Print
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Ron Fridell states, "The basic principles of deterrence are that punishments are necessary to deter crime and encourage law abiding behavior. Punishment must also fit the crime with more serious crimes requiring more serious punishments. (61) I agree with the author because capital punishment serves as a device to discourage certain forms of behavior by making the consequences of these actions unpleasant. Capital punishment is acceptable under those terms and it is necessity to the betterment of society. Micheal Kronwetter said, "No other punishment deters men so effectively as the punishment of death."(19) As an example, murder peaked in 1990 with 2,200 deaths, when New York did not have the death penalty. In 1997, when capital punishment was reinstated the murders for the year totaled 767. Deterrence obviously worked in relation to these crimes. There seems to be a direct relationship between deterrence and the effects of capital…
- 728 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Some people might agree with the death penalty. Families get devastated when someone they love and care about has died. Its different when that person they care so much about has been murdered or killed. People tend to hate that person and have the urge to do just about anything to them in order for them to suffer, which causes us to take, revenge on them. This matter has lead to the death penalty. This is a punishment that slowly kills the man or woman that has committed the crime. Why should we have pity on those who choose to kill? If they felt powerful enough to kill, then we should be able to do the same to them. Whatever their reason is that they choose to kill they should be punished someway, somehow.…
- 288 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The history of the death penalty can be traced back in time all the way to the fifth century B.C. through Roman’s Law of the Twelve Tablets, where people would be put to death through crucifixion, drowning, and even by being burnt alive.. From there it can be found in seventh B.C.’s Draconian Code, and even in eighteenth century B.C. through the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon, in which twenty-five various crimes would lead to the death penalty (Part I, 2015). Though the crimes punishable under the death penalty and the methods of which the death penalty have changed over time, the ideology behind the method still stands the same: An eye for an eye. The argument for the death penalty stands that those who commit a crime such as capital murder should be punished the same way that they punished their victim: by death. However, while this ethical principle may sound clear and cut on paper, the stance-both for and against-and methodology behind the death penalty is much more complicated than that.…
- 2028 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays -
The death penalty does not belong in this society.It causes many innocent people to be unjustly killed.It is inhuman and criminals deserve to rot in prison, not die and be free.therefore everyone should strongly oppose the horrific death…
- 303 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The argument for the death penalty is that many accept as true that if you kill then you deserve to die. When an individual takes another individual’s life they forgo or surrender their own right to their life. Committing a homicide is one of the vilest felonies anyone can do and therefore it should get the nastiest penalty they can receive.…
- 2428 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
The gains associated with capital punishment are the affect it can have on effectively deterring criminals from not only murderer, but any serious crime (Cameron 1989). It is used as an intimidation factor for which people weigh the cost and benefits of their actions, and in a case where the cost is their life, the probability of them committing a crime will decrease (Shepherd 2004). The significant relationship it shares with the homicide rate has been found that 150 fewer homicides take place in reaction to one execution happening to a convicted murderer (Cooter and Ulen 2012). Looking at this relationship directly from an economic perspective, capital punishment can be seen as a commodity; an increase in it leads to an increase in consumer welfare as it decreases the chance of another victim being murdered (Cameron 1993). The effect that deterrence has on society is seen as a public good as well because of the positive, widespread affect it has on a larger number of consumers by increases their safety and security. By increasing the amount of resources the government puts towards conviction and punishment for criminal activities, it will allow for a reduction in harm (Cooter and Ulen 2012) and allow the demand for protection and a safer environment to be met. Capital punishment is the strongest alternative of punishment to create the largest deterrent…
- 2611 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The death penalty has many benefits. One is that it can help stop evil people from hurting others again in the future. A study in Texas, a state where re-arrests are common, showed that only 20% of prisoners served all their time (Dieter). If the death penalty had played a bigger role in Texas prisons, fewer prisoners would have been released early, and re-arrests would become less common. It has been shown that for every inmate put to death 3 to 18 murders are prevented (Muhlhausen).…
- 603 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“In the early 1970, the top argument in favor of the death penalty was general deterrence” (Radelet & Borg, 2000, page 2). The authors argue that the death penalty does not prevent others from committing the same offense. They describe how deterrence studies have failed to support the hypothesis that the death penalty is more effective at preventing criminal homicides than along imprisonment.…
- 883 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
I initially found it almost absurd that people who support the death penalty, but I soon realized that the grieving families who lost their loved one would feel more comfortable knowing that the punishment had been paid. It And that for them, they can rest easier and continue on with their lives. And that with the process of the death penalty, the criminal would have an impossible chance to escape the prison and commit more crimes.Many of the students that favored pro death were affected by a criminal hurting one of their loved ones. And as soon as I realized this, it made perfect sense that they wanted the death penalty out of defense for themselves and their community, because they did not desire anyone to endure their…
- 740 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
There are many differences in the way people view the death penalty. Some are against it and some agree with it. There have been many studies trying to prove or disprove a point regarding the death penalty. Some have regarded the death penalty as a hindrance, and some have regarded it as state sanctioned murder and not civilized. The death penalty has been linked to societies for hundreds of years. More recently, as we become more civilized, the death penalty has been questioned on if it is the correct way to so enforce justice on the people. The death penalty is a highly controversial subject. No one knows who’s right or who’s wrong-it’s fifty percent speculation and fifty percent research. It’s just a lot of thoughts and beliefs from people who have contributed to the death penalty controversy. Who’s right and who’s wrong? That is the question.…
- 2140 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
A. Punishment is supposed to be a temporary penalization for a wrongful action. Death is far from temporary.…
- 132 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
People who support the death penalty would argue that the death penalty deters people from murder because they are scared of being sentenced to death. It might scare some people, but the vast majority of murders would kill anyway, for most murders are not rationalizing their actions. Also, according to some being sentenced to life is a worse punishment than the death penalty for death would put them out of their misery. The life sentence is just as bad as a death sentence, so why have the death penalty at all? The death penalty is not beneficial. It only creates problems.…
- 2248 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays -
Some people are against the killing of others for any reasons. Other people feel that certain crimes should be punished by death. The death penalty is a very controversial topic in the United States today and has been for a number of years, because people's life is at risk. The reviewing the numbers of facts prove that the death penalty should not be enforced. I think death penalty is the ultimate denial of human rights. It violates the right to life as proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It is the ultimate cruel, inhuman, and degrading punishment. It should be abolished in this country it's racial discrimination, the financial cost and barbarity.…
- 631 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Bibliography: Radelet, Michael L, and Traci L Lacock. "Do Executions Lower Homicide Rates?: The Views of Leading Criminologists." Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology. 09.02 (2009): 489-508. Print.…
- 1255 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Crime is a part of everyday life and everyone is aware of the threat it possesses, but the question lies in the methods in which it should be dealt with. A major issue in today’s society is whether or not the death penalty is a proper form of punishment. Many people have different opinions on the issue because of its many pros and cons. The arguments against the death penalty show that executions are more expensive than life in prison, the innocent may be wrongly accused, and it is not a deterrent to crime.…
- 817 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays