If we executed those who have killed, our country would be safer and wealthier. However two wrongs don’t make a right. Killing a human convicted or not, is lowering down to their level and being looked at as their equal which makes our citizens feel guilty. Some believe that a prison is no longer a punishment but a rehabilitation center, hoping that one may come to ones senses and become a better individual. Arguing capital punishment, Amnesty International says, "The death penalty is the ultimate denial of human rights. It is the premeditated and cold-blooded killing of a human being by the state in the name of justice. It violates the right to life. It is the ultimate cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment. There can never be any justification for torture or for cruel treatment." Is it justifying revoking their right to live as they did their victims? The way people feel about the death penalty is what’s stopping states to enforce it completely.
Capital punishment was initially established to create peace among the people. Today, it has led to a major factor in the counties debt, a raise in taxes, an unsafe environment and moral issues; In addition, has raised controversy with the “right to life” Liberal groups and the “eye for and eye” theory of the conservative groups.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Some people might agree with the death penalty. Families get devastated when someone they love and care about has died. Its different when that person they care so much about has been murdered or killed. People tend to hate that person and have the urge to do just about anything to them in order for them to suffer, which causes us to take, revenge on them. This matter has lead to the death penalty. This is a punishment that slowly kills the man or woman that has committed the crime. Why should we have pity on those who choose to kill? If they felt powerful enough to kill, then we should be able to do the same to them. Whatever their reason is that they choose to kill they should be punished someway, somehow.…
- 288 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The history of the death penalty can be traced back in time all the way to the fifth century B.C. through Roman’s Law of the Twelve Tablets, where people would be put to death through crucifixion, drowning, and even by being burnt alive.. From there it can be found in seventh B.C.’s Draconian Code, and even in eighteenth century B.C. through the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon, in which twenty-five various crimes would lead to the death penalty (Part I, 2015). Though the crimes punishable under the death penalty and the methods of which the death penalty have changed over time, the ideology behind the method still stands the same: An eye for an eye. The argument for the death penalty stands that those who commit a crime such as capital murder should be punished the same way that they punished their victim: by death. However, while this ethical principle may sound clear and cut on paper, the stance-both for and against-and methodology behind the death penalty is much more complicated than that.…
- 2028 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays -
This money comes out of our taxes. Cases without the use of death row costs roughly $740,00. Cases that do involve the death penalty costs around $1.26 million. In total, taxpayers pay $90,000 per year to pay for the cost of the death penalty. The fact that we are paying so much for something that we could go without is outrageous. We should be using this money that is going towards capital punishment for something more useful.…
- 424 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The costs of the death penalty are dramatically different than the costs of housing a prisoner. The annual costs for a single prisoner are very high. A study released by NBC Right Now claims that Washington taxpayers pay $35,897 for each prisoner annually. All of that money goes towards food, shelter, health care, mental health care, clothing, and other general utilities. Prison staff salaries and the cost to build a prison are not included in this figure. Almost $36,000 for a single prisoner; now multiply that by the over 2,000,000 inmates currently imprisoned in the US- it equals over seventy one billion dollars each year. If a 25 year old is convicted of murder…
- 1348 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
The death penalty should still be used for the simple fact of the famous quote in the bible “An eye for and eye”. It is known that when someone kills someone or either steals they get what they have coming for them, but there are other ways to settle this that helps and seems right for everyone. Like if it something minor happens it does not have to go straight into severe punishment. There are even more ways to do something that makes everyone happy, they just have to compromise and figure it…
- 800 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Title: Point: Capital Punishment Should Be Abolished. By: Ballaro, Beverly, Cushman, C. Ames, Points of View: Death Penalty, 2009 Database: Points of View Reference Center…
- 4048 Words
- 17 Pages
Better Essays -
This is true for several different reasons. Life without parole cases usually stay in prisons for about thirty to forty years. This costs the American tax payers anywhere from $1.2 million to $3.6 million for each case (Lowe). On the other hand, death penalty cases cost around $34,200 (Lowe). In both instances, it costs American tax payers money; nevertheless, capital punishment is significantly cheaper than life without parole. The American people should not have to pay for violent murderers to live when they have committed such vulgar crimes and do not even deserve this allowance in the first…
- 2065 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays -
First, there is a lot of history and mystery behind the death penalty and almost all nations in the world have had the death sentence and have enforced it in many ways. It was used in almost all cases to punish those who broke the laws or standards set by society. Some of the historical methods of execution are flaying or burying alive, boiling in oil, crushing beneath the wheels of vehicles or the feet of elephants, being thrown into a pit filled with wild meat eating animals , being forced to fight in a combat arena, being shot from the mouth of a cannon, impaling, piercing with javelins, starving to death, poisoning, strangling, suffocating, drowning, shooting, beheading, and more recently to be introduced, electrocuting, using the gas chamber, and being given a leather injection(Amnesty) . The ancient societies had some pretty brutal methods that were just plainly inhumane.…
- 2140 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
After analyzing Ernest Van Den Haag’s case study ‘In Defense of the Death Penalty’, and Hugo A. Bedau’s ‘The Case Against the Death Penalty’, I have conflicting feelings contradict my own analysis. Ernest Van Den Haag breaks down the pros and cons of the death penalty and uses retributivism to justify death penalty and capital punishment, while Hugo A. Bedau’s article is about the inconsistency in capital punishment and in particular on the abolition of practice. Each article states key positions that make my feelings conflicted between both sides, Bedau backs up that the majority of people persecuted fight through several trails after a long period incarcerated with life sentenced to death end up guilty. (Bedau, 243) Van Den Haag key positions reflect in the retributivist statement, “eye for an eye”. (Van Den Haag, 231) I believe in both sides, and in my own opinion there is no solution for middle ground.…
- 837 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
I will be the first to admit that there are people in this world that has done some pretty terrible things. Maybe to themselves or to other people! Even though those people may have no remorse over the things they have done us as human beings have to be the ones to say when enough is enough. The history of the death penalty is a long and brutal one. From the stoning and crucifixion killings of the B.C. era to today’s methods of the electric chair and lethal injection, governments of one kind or another have sentenced people to death for thousands of years [CA Innocence Project, 2009]. It’s simply a disciplinary act that needs to be eliminated. Wouldn’t it be more efficient for Guilty people to sit in jail and live with what they have committed? To think about what they have done day in and day out, to have the world judge them and to know that family and friends has shunned them from their lives, because of the things that they have done in the past. They may not get over it today, maybe not even tomorrow but after a life time of sitting in the jail with nothing and no one, they are more than likely to “break down” and feel the guilt sooner or later. They would not be human if they didn’t, to have to grow old and sit in prison knowing that you won’t ever be able to leave or see sunlight ever again. Knowing that no one’s going to help you, and knowing that that is where you are going to die would be a terrible feeling.…
- 614 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The death penalty could be a cost effective way of getting rid of dangerous criminals. Maintaining each death row prisoner cost the taxpayers ninety thousand more per year than a prisoner in a general population. Getting rid of people on death row will save taxpayers a lot more money. It could be a cost effective way of getting rid of dangerous criminals and to keep the less violent criminals in for longer. Getting rid of people who are on a life sentence or on death row will save taxpayers a lot of money which could be spent on other things in…
- 715 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“Forgiving violence does not mean condoning violence. There are only two alternatives to forgiving violence: revenge, or adopting an attitude of never-ending bitterness and anger. For too long we have treated violence with violence, and that's why it never ends.” (Coretta Scott King, Widow of Martin Luther King) Capital Punishment should be considered cruel and unusual punishment. The Catholic Church is adamantly opposed to the death penalty. The death penalty should be banned as long as there are non-lethal means to defend and protect the people’s safety.…
- 1865 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
The first death penalty generally recorded happened in sixteenth Century BC Egypt where the wrongdoer was blamed for enchantment, and requested to take his own life. Today, in the U.S. the death penalty is still practiced in thirty states. The controversy of the death penalty can go on and on. Despite the still large numbers using it’s practices their main reasons for its use appear to be that it provides closure for the victims and not surprisingly saves tax payers money. However, the cons of the death penalty outweigh the pros. The death penalty should not be used because it does not persuade criminals to stop committing murders, prison itself should be a fair enough punishment, and it is cruel and…
- 280 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
It cost more money to keep someone alive instead of killing them. Tax payers should not have to pay for a criminals life in jail. They have to pay for everything their clothes, shelter, and food. They also pay for their chance to get out of jail. Every year a prison gets older so tax payers also have to pay for their health care. It cost tax payers $140 billion over the course of one persons life in jail. If someone goes to jail at age 37 it cost the tax payers 49,000 a year and by the time they are 77 then they end up paying as much a 4 million. According to Petersen, Nicholas, and Mona Lynch, The decision to seek the death penalty in a pending murder prosecution triggers a number of consequences that affect the…
- 1378 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The death penalty dates back as far as the Ancient Laws of China. In the 18th Century B.C., the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon codified the death penalty for twenty-five…
- 2636 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays