Introduction:
For the past few years, Death penalty has been a big issue to our country. Some people are in favor of it, but most are not. Just imagine our country if death penalty is on the go?
My view:
Death penalty is a way to lessen crime in our country. Death penalty controls crime in some countries like China. As we all know, death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is a way of sentencing someone to death because of a certain committed crime, and is the sentence of death upon a person by the state as a punishment for an offence.
Just remember last march 2011 when three Overseas Filipino Workers were sentenced to death because of drug trafficking. Our country begged for the OFWs lives but china still sentenced them to death. And this coming Thursday, (December 8, 2011) another overseas Filipino worker was again sentenced to death because he as caught with an illegal drug called “heroine”.
Death penalty is also a way to lessen those people in who are being put into prison, people who are committing crime. If death penalty or capital punishment will be once again executed here in our country, maybe most Filipinos would be afraid to commit crime after all.
Counter argument:
Capital punishment is often opposed on the grounds that innocent people will inevitably be executed. Death penalty or capital punishment is against human rights. Is the worst violation of human rights, because the right to life is the most important, and judicial execution violates it without necessity and inflict to the condemned torture.
According to Albert Camus (wrote in a 1956 book called "Reflections on the Guillotine, Resistance, and Rebellion & Death”) “Execution is not simply death. It is just as different from the privation of life as a concentration camp is from prison. For there to be an equivalency, the death penalty would have to punish a criminal who had warned his victim of the date at which he would inflict a horrible death on him and who, from that moment onward, had confined him at his mercy for months. Such a monster is not encountered in private life.”
Conclusion:
From the facts that I stated above i think death penalty is very much racist. In conclusion, the death penalty may seem to be the best course of action in committing a crime.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The death penalty is an extremely vital way of the criminal justice system. The punishment of death can help decrease crime rates. Also, this way of death can lessen the amount of criminals and give families closure. It gives closure because, the families now know that this person will never be able to hurt them or anyone else ever again. The death penalty is a very good way to end many troubles within the U.S.…
- 849 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is the execution of a convicted criminal by the state as punishment for crimes known as capital crimes or capital offences. Capital punishment is a justified form of punishment for murderers and is enforced by most states. The death penalty is a fitting punishment for murder because executions maximize the public safety through a form of incapacitation and prevention. When a person kills another person, their common sense and mental reasoning is lost. As a result of this, the murderer is no longer capable of a mentally stable life not only to himself but also society as a whole. In contrast, moral issues question the accuracy and the benefits of the death penalty as well.…
- 360 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The death penalty should still be used for the simple fact of the famous quote in the bible “An eye for and eye”. It is known that when someone kills someone or either steals they get what they have coming for them, but there are other ways to settle this that helps and seems right for everyone. Like if it something minor happens it does not have to go straight into severe punishment. There are even more ways to do something that makes everyone happy, they just have to compromise and figure it…
- 800 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Capital punishment or death penalty is usually imposed on persons who committed heinous crimes and are those that endanger the safety of the society. Some countries and societies implement capital punishment while others do not. There are various reasons for this policy of countries, including the social view on the death penalty and the prevailing religious view in the society among others.…
- 2469 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
Capital punishment will deter people from committing a crime. In 1973, Ehrlich employed a new kind of analysis which produced results showing that for every inmate who was executed, 7 lives were spared because others were deterred from committing a murder. For each execution, the crime rate dropped by over 18%. By having the death penalty in our law system, it will teach kids to stay in school, so they don't get into…
- 715 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Capital punishment is murder. It really doesn 't matter how you look at it. The end result is still the same. "What is the difference between the state killing and an individual killing" (Moral Arguments 1). It adds up to be the same end result. It is "one more dead body, one more set of grieving parents, and one more cemetery slot. When we execute someone, we are sending a profound message of cynicism" about the value of human life (Moral Arguments 2). "Every time we execute someone," we are sinking to the same level as the killer (Moral…
- 1289 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
I agree that the people who kill should be punished severely and depending on the case sometimes be put to death. I also agree that it is possible that the death penalty may deter people from killing because of their fear of death, but I don’t think it would deter as many people as Pojman may think it will. I am confident enough to believe that while someone is committing a cold-blooded crime like killing someone what is going through his or her head is not the possible consequence. They are usually acting out of passion or out of fear, not thinking about how this may put them in the electric chair. You can also look at the situation of criminals that get out of jail but when they get out they keep committing crimes because they are so into what they are doing they forget that they are going to be punished. That is the main argument against the idea of deterrence, along with the fact that here is absolutely no evidence in the states with the death penalty that there are fewer murders. Actually many states in the south have the death penalty and at the same time have higher murder rates than states in the northeast without the death…
- 2171 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Capital punishment is good for keeping Bad people off the streets it is send out a message if you want to do something stupid you will get punished for it and by getting your life taken away, this is the most horrific punishment of all.…
- 312 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
George Bernard Shaw once said, “Murder and capital punishment are not opposites that cancel one another out but similar that breed their kind” (quoted in Costanzo 95). This shows why the act of the death penalty is not a deterrence to future criminals. If an individual truly feels the need to harm someone else, he/she will do it regardless of the consequences. By putting a murderer to death the, law is killing people, an act they are trying to deter people from.…
- 1980 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
The protective authority is becoming cleverer to stopping crimes and is still increasing for the past years. With the punishment of the death penalty crimes have not been decreasing. In fact the crime in the United States are 5 times more than Australia and Britain. The death penalty is an outdated form of punishment and should be abolished because it is cruel and unusual. With the death penalty enacted criminals have been killed for their crimes but cost 4 times more than have them as life in prison without parole. Some cases have happened where the “criminal” has been executed and soon with DNA was declared innocent. Life in prison also guarantees no future crimes, some religions go against the death penalty. Some people state that killing is wrong, and it breaks the international human rights which is the right to life. In society it is not practiced as much, the trail is not a fair manner. Some criminals that are convicted with murder don’t have good lawyers to protect them from the penalty. The death penalty promotes a normal solution to penalties. (http://www.antideathpenalty.org/)…
- 1683 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Some people are against the killing of others for any reasons. Other people feel that certain crimes should be punished by death. The death penalty is a very controversial topic in the United States today and has been for a number of years, because people's life is at risk. The reviewing the numbers of facts prove that the death penalty should not be enforced. I think death penalty is the ultimate denial of human rights. It violates the right to life as proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It is the ultimate cruel, inhuman, and degrading punishment. It should be abolished in this country it's racial discrimination, the financial cost and barbarity.…
- 631 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
But if the death penalty was brought back would-be criminals would think twice before committing a offense punishable by death and due to this the society would gain security an example of this is China. Last year alone over 2000 people were killed due to the death penalty , even though china has one of the greatest populations in the world it has one of the lowest due to its strict laws.…
- 1300 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
The death penalty goes back as far as the 17th century. From burning alive to beating to death, the death penalty was carried out in some of the cruelest and most painful ways one could imagine. Although more efficient ways of execution have been discovered, such as lethal injections, capital punishment is still ruthless and a lot of times unnecessary. Capital punishment is like the easy way out of dealing with criminals by “eliminating the complexities of judge and jury” (Source J), when there are much more efficient punishments that could be used when dealing with a felony. Capital punishment should not be used for so many different reasons; it is immoral, very costly and mistakes that could be prevented happen way too often.…
- 776 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Fear of the death penalty will keep potential murderers from committing the crime. Capital punishment is immoral because of the kind of killing it is, rather than because it is a kind of killing in a simpler degree. If capital punishment is used, it must be used every time. It is imperative that the death penalty must be enforced in every case, or not at all. The morality of the death penalty is not the result of executing a prisoner; it is the obligations of the person doing the execution. Morality is defined at “the principles of right or wrong.” Even if the death penalty deterred crime more successfully than life imprisonment, that doesn’t necessarily mean it would be justified. Capital punishment permanently removes the worst criminals from society and should prove much safer for the rest of us than long term or permanent incarceration. It is self evident that dead criminals cannot commit any further crimes, either within prison or after escaping or after being released from…
- 1037 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The death penalty is absolutely outrageous. There is no real reason that the government should feel that it has the right to execute people. Capital punishment is murder just as much as the people being executed murdered. The is no need for the death penalty and it needs to be abolished. It goes against the Constitution which states that there will be no cruel and unusual punishment. There is nothing crueler than killing a person.…
- 1098 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays