Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Death Penalty as Capital Punishment

Good Essays
962 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Death Penalty as Capital Punishment
Death Penalty as Capital Punishment

Justice and human dignity: These words come to mind when the death penalty is discussed. They are the foundation for democracy and civilization. They can be regarded as the cornerstones in the defense of capital punishment. In the judicial system dealing with crime and punishment, the concept of justice lurks in the shadows when it should ultimately be the foundation within the legal system. Rather than keeping it under cover of darkness, allow justice to be brought forward and into the light when the death penalty is discussed. Deserving the utmost respect is mans dignity. Dignity and respect for the victims of these crimes needs to be the highest consideration today more so than for the perpetrator who killed his fellow man especially when connected to the death penalty. In other words, the prerequisite for society should be one of sympathy and solidarity with the victim. Empathy and understanding for the victims and their relatives are necessary in order to rightly value the death penalty. The death penalty will only slightly lower the number of criminals since murders and violent offenders will always exist in society. However, one less violent criminal will make for a safer society. A lengthy prison term still leaves the possibility of parole and, until death, a dark cloud that will hover over society. Affirming the death penalty proclaims publicly to the criminal that his evil and immoral acts will not be tolerated. It is the strongest moral declaration a society can make proclaiming that some crimes are deserving of capital punishment. However, more than any other punishment, the death penalty also declares that the criminal is also moral individual with responsibilities. Punishment follows justice, and dislike follows punishment. Dislike can also be termed as wrath. Therefore the wrath of society on the violent acts of criminals and murderers is testimony that our concern, sympathy and compassion towards the victims are honest and binding. By not reacting to the heinous acts of these criminals, a society is doomed to loose its humanity and feeling. It would only be natural that such an unfeeling society does not understand or accept capital punishment. The most powerful way a society can show how much it respects, values, and understands its afflicted citizens, is capital punishment. To quote The Bible in Genesis 9:6 “Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed; for in the image of God has God made man.” It does not matter if these words came from a god or not, what matters is these words, written almost four thousand years ago, speak of justice. It is a belief of the value of man and his life that has existed since far back in history. Instinctively people know that man has value and dignity. To murder a man, and destroy that value and dignity, that person does not deserve to live. The death penalty would come naturally for murders and violent criminals by a society that respects and values man, the ultimate victim of a crime. Therefore, in a deeper sense, capital punishment is about placing emphasis on the human value. The perpetrator should never be allowed to claim any form of “value.” This individual has viciously and without respect, crushed the value of his fellow man. Justice has to be demanded and recompense is the death penalty. To take another persons life is the most atrocious crime on the face of this earth. It is the utmost violation an individual can endure. It drastically despises the value of human life. Victims of this horrible crime are deprived of ever seeing the sun rise or the light of day, hearing the songs of birds, enjoy the aroma of a rose or freshly baked bread, rejoice at the sound of a loved ones voice, gently stroke a baby’s cheek, spend quality time with friends, and never again to smile over the beauty of life. The pain endured over the loss of a loved will still remain. It cannot be cured by capital punishment. However, a clear and decisive turning point towards inner peace and healing for the soul can be experienced when the death penalty is carried out. An understanding and feeling that justice has prevailed through the death penalty will become evident as an inner peace begins to ease into the soul. These individuals will always feel uneasy in their heart if they know the perpetrator of the violent crime did not receive the punishment they deserved. The criminal’s deed will come to an end when the death penalty is carried out.
This is an end to someone who has caused so much pain and grief for the victims loved ones. This is the beginning of the road for inner peace. Sentencing a murderer to a life in prison is only a reminder to the victim’s relatives and the rest of society, that the possibility this individual may be free again, allowing the wound to remain open, festering, constantly causing pain. Valid arguments for the death penalty are difficult to find. Some are likely to use emotional expressions and witty slogans when they attack the death penalty. If one can remain calm when listening to speeches about the death penalty being uncivilized and barbaric, seriously examining them, it will be easy to see how weak and superficial these attacks actually are. Keeping justice, the value of man, and democracy, as the central ideas, is what makes capital punishment reasonable. Place these ideas in full view when discussing the death penalty along with the relationship of this punishment to the victims and their relatives. When applied in this manner, no argument against the death penalty can disconnect this position as a justifiable method of punishment.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeffrey Toobin Summary

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to the author the modern executioner's job has changed, likewise, the death penalty has also changed. Jeffrey Toobin suggests killing prisoners who are on death row is necessitated but harm should not be caused. The author believes that the death penalty is uncivilized in our civilized society. Toobin also affirms the fact that the death penalty has become unpalatable and gruesome because of the great length's states have gone to come up with other ways of execution. For…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is an extremely vital way of the criminal justice system. The punishment of death can help decrease crime rates. Also, this way of death can lessen the amount of criminals and give families closure. It gives closure because, the families now know that this person will never be able to hurt them or anyone else ever again. The death penalty is a very good way to end many troubles within the U.S.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment is regarded as one of the United States' hottest topics. Those for and against it constantly debate over the various issues that capital punishment brings forth. This essay explains just a few of these topics and my view on the death penalty.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    13. What does Teiresias reveal to Oedipus as a result of the king's angry accusation? Note the emphasis on sight and blindness in the dialogue between Oedipus and Teiresias. What irony is implicit in this emphasis?…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his essay Death and Justice, Edward Koch argues in support of capital punishment, he believes it is just and it saves lives. He successfully delivers an argument laced with true and vivid examples of unforgettable murderous events. His intended audience consists of the opposing voters and readers of the New Republic, the political magazine that published his essay. Prior to reading Edward Koch’s essay I was sure that I would disagree but it became clear to me that he is right. There are seven commonly held views against the death penalty that Koch argues against in his essay. In what follows I discuss a few of his arguments and show that the death penalty is the most viable approach to deal with convicted murderers.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty has been an ongoing debate on whether it should be allowed or whether it violates our constitutional right. While most developed Western nations have stopped executing the United States continues to execute offenders (Zimring 2004). From 1977 through 2008 1,136 people have been executed, which consisted of people who committed murder (Procon 2010). Those who are in favor of the death penalty believe it is an important tool to help deter crime and it cost less than life imprisonment (Procon 2010). They believe retribution helps console the grieving family and it also ensures that the offender will never be able to commit another heinous crime (Procon 2010). According to Grant (2004) some people believe that some offenders should face the death penalty because of vengeance and retribution for violent crimes. During the…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    If we examine some arguments presented from both sides, opponents of the capital punishment claim that executing someone is nothing more than an immoral, state-authorized killing which undervalues the human life and destroys our respect for our government which itself says that killing is wrong. But the supporters of the death penalty think that certain murderers do deserve nothing less than a death for themselves and that although everyone is born with the right to live, criminals lose these rights at the moment when they take away the rights of another human and only by punishing them in such way, the society is affirming the value which is placed on the victim’s right to live.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When understanding criminal law it is important to consider the positive and negative effects that different punishment alternatives can have. Over the last century the use of capital punishment, the legal process for which an individual is sentence to death when found guilty of committing a crime, has been a subject debated back and forth between government parties on its effectiveness. Many people believe that the issues of fairness, constitutionality, morality of an individual’s life, and potential of convicting the innocent are too important to allow the use of the…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another benefit of the death penalty is that it decreases crime. A study was done in states where the death penalty was enacted and for every execution, 14 people are deterred from committing a murder each year (Muhlhausen). When criminals see the high form of punishment murders receive, they are fearful of what consequences they would face if they performed a similar violent crime.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty has been a criminal sentence imposed in America for hundreds of years, but it have been extremely controversial as Evan Mandery illustrates in “A Wild Justice: The Death and Resurrection of Capital Punishment in America.” Today, the death sentence is strictly used in murder cases and in thirty-two out of the fifty states in America. In these states, it is completely legal to use the ultimate punishment of death to incapacitate a criminal from committing any further harm to society. Throughout American history, many individuals have supported the death penalty because they believe it is an effective way to deter crime and is a form of retribution. Others have strongly advocated against capital punishment because it is not morally correct and it not applied fairly. Also, some argue that it is unconstitutional to use the death penalty because it violates the cruel and unusual punishment provision of the Eight Amendment written in the United States Constitution.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently, there has been talk amongst many Americans about whether or not the “death penalty” should be outlawed in the United States. Although the crime may be unforgivable, no one should have the right to decide whether or not a person’s life should be stripped away, because nothing is more important than a person’s life. There are many reasons why the death penalty should be outlawed, one reason is that many criminals put on trial may face discrimination, and receive a bias punishment. Another reason is that the death penalty is very costly and that the alternative, life without parole, is a much cheaper and easier solution. The death penalty also reflects the moral standing of today's society. Nobody can justify taking another person’s…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    George Bernard Shaw once said, “Murder and capital punishment are not opposites that cancel one another out but similar that breed their kind” (quoted in Costanzo 95). This shows why the act of the death penalty is not a deterrence to future criminals. If an individual truly feels the need to harm someone else, he/she will do it regardless of the consequences. By putting a murderer to death the, law is killing people, an act they are trying to deter people from.…

    • 1980 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    An innocent man is wrongly executed whilst a man who raped and murdered a mother and her thirteen year old daughter spends the rest of his life with three meals a day and cable television. Which of these is the bigger injustice? The use of the death penalty to punish serious crimes is a very controversial topic and there is much debate surrounding the issue. This paper will briefly discuss arguments supporting and against the use of the death penalty.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is a major topic for debate Shannon Rafferty defends in her portfolio published by Penn State entitled “Death Penalty Persuasive Essay.” She believes the penalty should be allowed because it functions as a deterrent, it provides society retribution and it is morally just. Olivia H. disagrees with use of the death penalty in her essay “Capital Punishment Is Dead wrong.” She tells about the risk of punishing the innocent, and how the states are doing irreversible acts of crime. As the authors disagree about whether the death penalty should be allowed, they have some common ground when it comes to admitting the potential for human error and in both disagreeing to the use of barbaric punishments by the government.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This article provides applicable information from many sources such as a Governors, Political Science Professors, the Executive Director of the Death Penalty Information Center as well as the President of the United States, providing legitimacy to the…

    • 2185 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays