Preview

Death Penalty Thesis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2150 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Death Penalty Thesis
Authorities agree that the Death Penalty in the United States deters crime and reduces the number of murders. The Death Penalty needs to be consistently implemented or else the number of murders and homicides committed will be on the rise. A notable amount of homicides will be prevented when it is constantly enforced. Former Supreme Court Justice Marshall McComb revealed the files of the Los Angeles Police Department to display the deterrent effect of the Death Penalty on savage criminals. There are plenty of examples of murders not committed because of the deterrent effect the Death Penalty has on criminals (Jacoby). In 1973, Isaac Ehrlich, an American economist who did extensive research on the deterrent effects of the Death Penalty, conducted …show more content…
Margaret Elizabeth Daly, a woman who attacked Pete Gibbons with a knife, told authorities, “yeah, I cut him, and I should have done a better job. I would have killed him, but I didn’t want to go to the gas chamber” (qtd. Jacoby). When Daly said she did not want to go to the gas chamber, Margret meant that she did not want to get the death penalty. In 2004, Michael Summers, professor of management science, conducted a study that examined the relationship between the number of executions and the number of murders for a 26 year period from 1979 to 2004. The study revealed that when execution increase, the murders will decrease. In the early 1980s, the return of the Death Penalty was associated with the drop in murder rate. Since 2001, there has been a decrease in executions and an increase in murders. Naci Mocan, Professor and Chair of economics at Louisiana State University, investigated the impact of an execution, homicide arrest rate, commutation rates and the death penalty. He found a significant relationship among execution, commutation rates, and the rate of homicide. Mocan revealed that each execution decreases homicides, and one additional removal from death row generates another homicide …show more content…
An example of this is letting a parking meter expired which is a penalty of twenty dollars or parking in a handicap spot which is a penalty of 200 dollars. The penalty on the handicap spot would have a more deterrent effect because it’s costlier and has a more severe punishment than the parking meter penalty (Jacoby). Modern referred studies have consistently shown the strong deterrent effect of the Death Penalty. Each execution deters between three and eighteen murders. Most criminals respond to sanctions and execution is the most severe sanction possible (“Does”). The cost of the Death Penalty may be somewhat high, but the deterrent effect yields a much more valuable benefit because it saves lives. A psychologist names David Lester of Richard Stockton College conducted a comprehensive review and study of capital punishment research. Since 1975, almost all of the studies tracking effects of the Death Penalty have found deterrent effect (Muhlhausen). In California, there are currently 746 inmates in death row. Legal appeals and procedures make executions nearly impossible in the state. Studies have shown that the majority of Californians favor the Death Penalty. The state of California has not executed a criminal in ten years even with 746 inmates in death

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ron Fridell states, "The basic principles of deterrence are that punishments are necessary to deter crime and encourage law abiding behavior. Punishment must also fit the crime with more serious crimes requiring more serious punishments. (61) I agree with the author because capital punishment serves as a device to discourage certain forms of behavior by making the consequences of these actions unpleasant. Capital punishment is acceptable under those terms and it is necessity to the betterment of society. Micheal Kronwetter said, "No other punishment deters men so effectively…as the punishment of death."(19) As an example, murder peaked in 1990 with 2,200 deaths, when New York did not have the death penalty. In 1997, when capital punishment was reinstated the murders for the year totaled 767. Deterrence obviously worked in relation to these crimes. There seems to be a direct relationship between deterrence and the effects of capital…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jacoby, Jeff. "When Murder is Punished with Death, Fewer Criminals Will Murder." Boston Globe, 26 Aug 2016, pp. K.5. SIRS Issues Researcher, http://sks.sirs.com.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty has been an ongoing debate on whether it should be allowed or whether it violates our constitutional right. While most developed Western nations have stopped executing the United States continues to execute offenders (Zimring 2004). From 1977 through 2008 1,136 people have been executed, which consisted of people who committed murder (Procon 2010). Those who are in favor of the death penalty believe it is an important tool to help deter crime and it cost less than life imprisonment (Procon 2010). They believe retribution helps console the grieving family and it also ensures that the offender will never be able to commit another heinous crime (Procon 2010). According to Grant (2004) some people believe that some offenders should face the death penalty because of vengeance and retribution for violent crimes. During the…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some may say that the death penalty is helpful to society because it intimidates criminals into committing less crimes, particularly murders, when in reality, studies like one done by Benjamin S. Tyree of the University of Richmond show that there is no correlation between the use of the death penalty and lower murder rates, and if anything, states that do not use the death penalty, have lower murder rates than those that do (Deter, Tyree). If that is the case, then it is obvious that the death penalty does not benefit our country.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The issue that I chose to write about in my paper is the Death Penalty. The Death Penalty has been a serious issue that has recurrently caused so much conflict in our world today. My argument is that the death penalty is very important to bring justice pertaining to murderers. This issue with the death penalty is one of the highest arguments in the United States. The death penalty is something that countless individuals do not have an unclouded opinion on. The death penalty dates all the way back to 1622.…

    • 2428 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminal deterrence will continue to be a valuable part of criminological studies. The rational choice perspective has expanded tremendously in the last few decades. It allows criminologist to examine the reasoning process of not only offenders, but the victims as well. The concept of deterrence assumes a much higher degree of rationality. Deterrence doctrine uses the three functions of certainty, severity, and speed of punishment as key elements in the rational decision making process aimed at deciding between criminal and non-criminal paths of conduct (2013). The death penalty does serve as a deterrence from crime. But studies have indicated this might not be the case for every offender. But I would argue that even the deterrence of one individual…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty has many benefits. One is that it can help stop evil people from hurting others again in the future. A study in Texas, a state where re-arrests are common, showed that only 20% of prisoners served all their time (Dieter). If the death penalty had played a bigger role in Texas prisons, fewer prisoners would have been released early, and re-arrests would become less common. It has been shown that for every inmate put to death 3 to 18 murders are prevented (Muhlhausen).…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In the early 1970, the top argument in favor of the death penalty was general deterrence” (Radelet & Borg, 2000, page 2). The authors argue that the death penalty does not prevent others from committing the same offense. They describe how deterrence studies have failed to support the hypothesis that the death penalty is more effective at preventing criminal homicides than along imprisonment.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Radelet, M. L., Akers, R. L. (1996) Deterrence and the Death Penalty: The Views of the Experts,…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The eighth amendment is designed to protect us from cruel and unusual punishment. Conservation of the United States Constitution, and all moral ideologies have been set aside. An old form of barbaric punishment and the saying "eye for an eye" is still being widely accepted by Americans today. The old form of barbaric punishment is capital punishment. No matter how "humane" the death penalty has become, it is still the killing of another human being. When people stand outside prisons and cheer that an individual was murdered, there is a problem. When people justify the killing of another person, there is a problem. Capital Punishment is irrefutably murder, and murder is never justified.…

    • 1951 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Philosopher Emmanuel Kant made an argument stating that killing someone for deterrence is using them as a tool, and it is unjust within itself (Pojman 70). Many think that by having the death penalty as a consequence for first degree murder, the rates of homicide will drop, because it will “put fear into the hearts of people”(Costanzo 96), but that is not correct. In a survey done by the Death Penalty Information Center, the number of murders in a state implementing the death penalty within the last twenty years have been higher than in a state without the penalty. As recently as 2010, the murder rate of states with the penalty was 25% greater than states without the penalty (“Deterrence”). Those statistics show that although the law may stop a few individuals, it is not a considerable enough number to call it deterrence.…

    • 1980 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Death Penalty

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As a deterrent to crime, the death penalty has little effect because the chances of a murder being sentenced to death are slim to none. However the death penalty deters some people. As the Royal Commission (1948–1953) observed in its lengthy and thoughtful report, “We can number its failures, but we cannot number its successes.”23 We can never know how many people who would have otherwise committed murder stopped them only because society threatened death as punishment. The deterrence question, really, is not whether the death penalty deters—sometimes it surely does—but whether, on balance, it deters more effectively than life without parole. (D’elia).…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper will examine the historical foundations, uses and the contemporary issues of the death penalty in America. It will go into where the death penalty came from and how it is used differently throughout the states. Understanding why America uses the death penalty. Outlines many issues caused by America using the death penalty. Discussing the different methods of execution and various laws adopted by various states.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As of April 1, 2008, there were 3,320 convicted murderers on death row, and of those 3,320 people, 65% of the murderers had a prior felony conviction (“The Death” 1). At the time that the 3,320 murderers on death row committed their crime, 26.7% of the murderers were on probation or parole (“The Death” 1). Therefore, it is obvious that convicted murderers pose a colossal threat to our society because the murders may not only commit murder once. When the death penalty is enforced, repeat criminals and murderers are no longer a threat; furthermore, the death penalty acts as a deterrent (Ornellas 6). Additionally, the death penalty provides swift justice for the victims and their families. Even though the death penalty should be used as a punishment for murder, only thirty-three states have not outlawed the death penalty (“States” 1). Convicted murderers are a mammoth threat to the public because the murders have the possibility of being released; therefore, the death penalty should be enacted in all states.…

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thesis Statement: Research suggests that capital punishment should be abolished to obviate mishandled executions, prevent wrongfully convicted citizens from being put to death and to lower taxpayer dollars for incurred expenses for inmates on death row.…

    • 2185 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays