Preview

Debate Between Parliamentary and Presidential Forms of Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3267 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Debate Between Parliamentary and Presidential Forms of Government
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ASSIGNMENT

MADE BY:
MANSUMYER SINGH
B.A.LL.B (2010-15)
SEC: A; ROLL NO: 09
A3211110009
DEBATE BETWEEN PARLIAMENTARY AND PRESIDENTIAL FORMS OF GOVERNMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction...............................................................................................................2
The parliamentary system..........................................................................................2
The Westminster model.............................................................................................4
Advantages of parliamentary system.........................................................................5
Disadvantages of parliamentary system....................................................................6
The presidential system.............................................................................................7
Advantages of presidential system............................................................................9
Disadvantages of the presidential system..................................................................9
Difference between parliamentary and presidential system....................................10
Conclusion...............................................................................................................11

INTRODUCTION
Parliamentary and Presidential systems are the two of the most popular forms of democratic governments.
With the political unrest that has gripped many countries; the debate between parliamentary and presidential forms of government has escalated the world over.
Both of them have their own benefits as well as their own disadvantages. No political system can be perfect or can always have stability, but shown in history there are successful countries that use either one. Also there are countries that have failed with one of the two systems.
The United States and Great Britain are two of the most popular examples of Presidential

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apush Chapter 6 Summary

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Chapter 12: The Presidency I. Presidents and prime ministers A. Characteristics of parliaments 1. Parliamentary system twice as common 2. Chief executive chosen by legislature 3. Cabinet ministers chosen from among members of parliament 4. Prime minister remains in power as long as his or her party or coalition maintains a majority in the legislature B. Differences 5. Presidents are often outsiders; prime ministers are always insiders, chosen by party members in parliament 6. Presidents choose their cabinet from outside Congress; prime ministers choose members of parliament 7. Presidents have no guaranteed majority in the legislature; prime ministers…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When one thinks of presidents residing over a country, the most coveted powers come to mind, especially for United States citizens, where its chief has centralized command over important facets of the government. However, not all presidential systems are the same. For some, the title only bears a symbolic representation for head of state and nothing more. Other presidents find themselves sharing powers with additional officials. The most interesting comparison between presidential systems that have different processes of election and distributions of authority is the United States and France. The examination of the nomination process, voting measures, campaign spending, the media and debates will distinguish the election process. Only then is it fitting to compare and contrasts constitutional powers that each president holds and the shaping of these powers by the governmental system.…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In recent times many commentators have pointed out that the UK’s Prime Ministers are increasingly acting like Presidents- of course the UK Prime Minister cannot actually become a President as the system would not allow it. Below I shall be analysing and explaining the factors that highlight the growth of presidentialism in the UK, as well as the points which suggest that the UK’s Prime Minister is still a Prime Minister.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Module 13 Vocabulary

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages

    19. Proportional representation- The most popular electoral system alternative to a “winner take all” kind of election, this is when there has to be a strong relation between the amount of votes a party has and the amount of parliamentary seats a party wins in order for them to take office.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nowadays, democracy is a very prevalent form of government but it wasn’t always this way. Monarchies, aristocracies, and oligarchies used to be the only main styles of governing, until Athens became the first democracy and Rome the first republic. The religions of Judaism and Christianity also provided many democratic ideals, such as the equality of all.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Currently, it is a raging matter on which form of government, representative or parliamentary, is best suited to solve a glove crisis such as the prevailing energy crisis or another gulf war. For instance, both governments may contemplate introducing speed limits on their highways of up to 53 mph because, of the worsening energy crisis. Interestingly, the two democracies have different methods of approaching any policy-making initiative owing to their differences in governance. Further, each democracy, representative (USA) or parliamentary (British), has its benefits and shortcomings. Despite this, the study argues that the U.S. representative democracy is best able to manage a global energy crisis between 2009-2011. The study is organized as follows: Section 1 compares the two forms of democracy. Section 2 is the case study.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Representation and voting are essential parts of a democratic system of government. The current voting system in the United States is the Electoral College. In the past, systems of popular voting had been used by other countries. There are pros and cons to both systems. However, a popular vote system, although hard to implement, is a more purely democratic system than the Electoral College.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this paper, I intend to analyse the extent to which the current Labour administration shows the characteristics of a presidential government. To do this, the term ‘presidential' must first be defined. A definition of a presidential government that is generally accepted by political analysts is ‘a system of government in which the powers of the president are constitutionally separate from those of the legislature.' The British system of government is parliamentary and does not match the definition of presidential. Therefore, the question must be answered by looking at the individual features of a presidential government and comparing them with aspects of the Labour administration and Tony Blair in particular. I will conclude by summarising the arguments presented.…

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    ways when comparisons are drawn from two similarly strong western liberal democratic systems. They both enjoy the same fundamental principles of liberal democracy, with those living under this system enjoying the same rights and freedoms with comparable economic conditions. The real difference between these two systems lies in the division of power (). Parliamentarism has been defined as having the parliament as the only democratically legitimate institution is parliament, whereby the government’s authority is completely dependent upon parliamentary confidence. (). While argues that there are three conditions necessary to declare a system parliamentary: All major government decisions must be taken by people chosen in elections conducted along party lines. Policy must be decided within governing party (parties if coalition). The highest officials (ministers) must be selected within their parties and be responsible to the people through their parties. On the other hand, in presidential systems according to , an executive with considerable constitutional powers - generally including full control of the composition of the cabinet and administration - is directly for a fixed term. The president is also the symbolic Head of State.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Westminster model and parliamentary democracy are effective because society is free to show whether they disapprove of policies or elements of parliaments and they can protest against them. There is also a lot of political diversity and many different ways to get involved and engage in politics, for example, pressure groups use various forms of advocacy in order to influence public opinion and/or policy.…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    a multiparty system, the people have a variety of choices to choose from when deciding their political opinion. However there are so many choices. Too many choices would make decision making hard. In a two party system, there are only two choices, aside from the minor parties. Of course, that can be a disadvantage at times because there are only two ideas from people to pick from, while…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madison's Dilemma

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are many systems of governments that can be classified into different types. Some of them being common amongst countries and some of them not so much. The two main organizations and/or alternatives that are most familiar are the presidential systems and the parliamentary systems. Various distinctions between these two types of systems can be distinguished. In a presidential system, the president is set apart from the legislative branch where as in the parliamentary system the chief executive (prime minister) is part of the legislative branch (the parliament).…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most recognized differences between a parliamentary and presidential system involves how the branches of government are organized. In a presidential government all three branches are separated. Parliamentary systems vest their executive power in the assembly. This means there is no separate executive branch.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The different forms of democratic systems are formed upon different histories. “Great Britain with an early industrial revolution and stable government developed a strong parliament that gradually became more democratic; on the other hand, France had a late industrial…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Political Science Paper

    • 2048 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The two most common types of democratic governmental systems are Parliamentary systems and Presidential systems. For many years, people have studied the effectiveness of both and have given reasons why a certain country should obtain a certain form of government. Examples of two countries that use these systems are Canada and the United States. Canada uses a traditional parliamentary system, and the United States uses a presidential system. In this paper, I will focus on the strengths of a parliamentary system, and the weaknesses of a presidential system, to prove my argument. Canada is better off with a parliamentary system then a presidential system for many reasons. In order for my argument to be persuasive, I will explain the differences in the two. In comparison to a presidential system, a parliamentary system has more closure in making decisions, the parties that exist within the system tend to be stronger, and there is a responsible government, which allows for the government leader to be more actively involved with its citizens.…

    • 2048 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays