Debate Outline
WSC 3rd speaker debate outline
Intro
Good Morning ladies and gentlemen, adjudicators and fellow opposition, today’s debate has been very interesting. My team members including _________ and _________ (team members) have made __ (number of points) undeniably strong points, thus allowing me to sum up today’s debate, proving that_______________(motion). Essentially, today’s debate revolves around who can __________(clash), however before I proceed to the clashes of today’s debate, I would first like to identify and penetrate the holes of the opposition team’s argument.
(1/2-1 minute)
Rebuttals
So, what was side opposition’s job in today’s debate? Their main job was to:
Build a model
(if they did not build a model)
Show the link between ________ and _________ which has showed their incompetence to see the fact that ________
In addition to this, I would like to rebut a few points raised by side _______’s(opposition) second speaker.
Firstly, she/he stated that ____________(rebuttal point 1), and thus ___________(effect of the point). Side proposition acknowledges the fact that _____________ because of this _________(motion must fall/stand), however, we reject their full analysis as this is exactly our argument. This is due to the fact that:
This statement contradicts the team’s stance and the _____ speaker’s point about _____
Side proposition
(1-2 minutes)
Clash
Onto the main clashes of today’s debate. As I said in the introduction today’s debate is essentially about ________ (idea.[combination of clashes], e.g. Motion: THW allow single parents in prison to raise their children behind bars, Idea: Which team best saves the children?), and thus comes down to __ (number of clashes)
The main clashes of today’s debate are _________ (clashes, e.g., definition of “raising” or the “best way” ).
Onto the first clash, ________ (First clash)
While on one side we have team_______(opposing team) who would _________ (point/bad idea) And on our team line,
Intro
Good Morning ladies and gentlemen, adjudicators and fellow opposition, today’s debate has been very interesting. My team members including _________ and _________ (team members) have made __ (number of points) undeniably strong points, thus allowing me to sum up today’s debate, proving that_______________(motion). Essentially, today’s debate revolves around who can __________(clash), however before I proceed to the clashes of today’s debate, I would first like to identify and penetrate the holes of the opposition team’s argument.
(1/2-1 minute)
Rebuttals
So, what was side opposition’s job in today’s debate? Their main job was to:
Build a model
(if they did not build a model)
Show the link between ________ and _________ which has showed their incompetence to see the fact that ________
In addition to this, I would like to rebut a few points raised by side _______’s(opposition) second speaker.
Firstly, she/he stated that ____________(rebuttal point 1), and thus ___________(effect of the point). Side proposition acknowledges the fact that _____________ because of this _________(motion must fall/stand), however, we reject their full analysis as this is exactly our argument. This is due to the fact that:
This statement contradicts the team’s stance and the _____ speaker’s point about _____
Side proposition
(1-2 minutes)
Clash
Onto the main clashes of today’s debate. As I said in the introduction today’s debate is essentially about ________ (idea.[combination of clashes], e.g. Motion: THW allow single parents in prison to raise their children behind bars, Idea: Which team best saves the children?), and thus comes down to __ (number of clashes)
The main clashes of today’s debate are _________ (clashes, e.g., definition of “raising” or the “best way” ).
Onto the first clash, ________ (First clash)
While on one side we have team_______(opposing team) who would _________ (point/bad idea) And on our team line,