Preview

Decision Support System

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6719 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Decision Support System
Decision Support Systems
Marek J. Druzdzel and Roger R. Flynn
Decision Systems Laboratory School of Information Sciences and Intelligent Systems Program University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA 15260 {marek,flynn}@sis.pitt.edu http://www.sis.pitt.edu/∼dsl

To appear in Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, Second Edition, Allen Kent (ed.), New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 2002

1

Contents
Introduction Decisions and Decision Modeling Types of Decisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Human Judgment and Decision Making . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Modeling Decisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Components of Decision Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Decision Support Systems Normative Systems Normative and Descriptive Approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Decision-Analytic Decision Support Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equation-Based and Mixed Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . User Interfaces to Decision Support Systems Support for Model Construction and Model Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4 4 4 5 5 6 7 7 8 10 11 11

Support for Reasoning about the Problem Structure in Addition to Numerical Calculations 11 Support for Both Choice and Optimization of Decision Variables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Graphical Interface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Summary 12 12 12

2

Introduction
Making decisions concerning complex systems (e.g., the management of organizational operations, industrial processes, or investment portfolios; the command and control of military units; or the control of nuclear power plants) often strains our cognitive capabilities. Even though individual interactions among a system’s variables may be



References: [1] Gregory F. Cooper and Edward Herskovits. A Bayesian method for the induction of probabilistic networks from data. Machine Learning, 9(4):309–347, 1992. [2] Robyn M. Dawes. Rational Choice in an Uncertain World. Hartcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers, 1988. [3] Marek J. Druzdzel. Probabilistic Reasoning in Decision Support Systems: From Computation to Common Sense. PhD thesis, Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, December 1992. 13 [4] Marek J. Druzdzel. Explanation in probabilistic systems: Is it feasible? will it work? In Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Intelligent Information Systems (WIS–96), pages 12–24, D¸blin, Poland, 2–5 JUne 1996. e [5] Marek J. Druzdzel. Five useful properties of probabilistic knowledge representations from the point of view of intelligent systems. Fundamenta Informaticæ, Special issue on Knowledge Representation and Machine Learning, 30(3/4):241–254, June 1997. [6] Marek J. Druzdzel. ESP: A mixed initiative decision-theoretic decision modeling system. In Working Notes of the AAAI–99 Workshop on Mixed-initiative Intelligence, pages 99–106, Orlando, FL, 18 July 1999. [7] Marek J. Druzdzel. SMILE: Structural Modeling, Inference, and Learning Engine and GeNIe: A development environment for graphical decision-theoretic models. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI–99), pages 902–903, Orlando, FL, July 18–22 1999. [8] Marek J. Druzdzel and F. Javier D´ Criteria for combining knowledge from different sources ıez. in probabilistic models. In Working Notes of the workshop on Fusion of Domain Knowledge with Data for Decision Support, Sixteenth Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI–2000), pages 23–29, Stanford, CA, 30 June 2000. [9] Marek J. Druzdzel and Herbert A. Simon. Causality in Bayesian belief networks. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI–93), pages 3–11, San Francisco, CA, 1993. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc. [10] Marek J. Druzdzel and Linda C. van der Gaag. Building probabilistic networks: “Where do the numbers come from?” guest editors’ introduction. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 12(4):481–486, July–August 2000. [11] Clark Glymour and Gregory F. Cooper, editors. Computation, Causation, and Discovery. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, 1999. [12] David E. Heckerman, Dan Geiger, and David M. Chickering. Learning Bayesian networks: The combination of knowledge and statistical data. Machine Learning, 20(3):197–243, 1995. [13] Max Henrion, John S. Breese, and Eric J. Horvitz. Decision Analysis and Expert Systems. AI Magazine, 12(4):64–91, Winter 1991. [14] Samuel Holtzman. Intelligent Decision Systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1989. [15] Ronald A. Howard and James E. Matheson. Influence diagrams. In Ronald A. Howard and James E. Matheson, editors, The Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis, pages 719– 762. Strategic Decisions Group, Menlo Park, CA, 1984. [16] Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky, editors. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982. [17] Paul E. Lehner, Theresa M. Mullin, and Marvin S. Cohen. A probability analysis of the usefulness of decision aids. In M. Henrion, R.D. Shachter, L.N. Kanal, and J.F. Lemmer, editors, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 5, pages 427–436. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North Holland), 1990. [18] Tsai-Ching Lu, Marek J. Druzdzel, and Tze-Yun Leong. Causal mechanism-based model construction. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI–2000), pages 353–362, San Francisco, CA, 2000. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc. 14 [19] Judea Pearl. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Mateo, CA, 1988. [20] Judea Pearl. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000. [21] Judea Pearl and Thomas S. Verma. A theory of inferred causation. In J.A. Allen, R. Fikes, and E. Sandewall, editors, KR–91, Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Second International Conference, pages 441–452, Cambridge, MA, 1991. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Mateo, CA. [22] Andrew P. Sage. Decision Support Systems Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1991. [23] Leonard J. Savage. The Foundations of Statistics (Second Revised Edition). Dover Publications, New York, NY, 1972. [24] Herbert A. Simon. Causal ordering and identifiability. In William C. Hood and Tjalling C. Koopmans, editors, Studies in Econometric Method. Cowles Commission for Research in Economics. Monograph No. 14, chapter III, pages 49–74. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1953. [25] Herbert A. Simon, Jayant R. Kalagnanam, and Marek J. Druzdzel. Performance budget planning: The case of a research university. In preparation, 2000. [26] Peter Spirtes, Clark Glymour, and Richard Scheines. Springer Verlag, New York, 1993. Causation, Prediction, and Search. [27] Detlof von Winterfeldt and Ward Edwards. Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988. [28] Haiqin Wang and Marek J. Druzdzel. User interface tools for navigation in conditional probability tables and elicitation of probabilities in Bayesian networks. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI–2000), pages 617–625, San Francisco, CA, 2000. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc. 15

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hcs/438 Dq's

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    EBOOK COLLECTION: Bennett, J.O., Briggs, W.L., & Triola, M.F. (2009). Statistical Reasoning for Everyday Life (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    busad 250 exam1 review

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Role of Business in Society and potential positive and negative effects (Exhibit 4, p. 8)…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bennett, J. O., Briggs, W.L., and Triola, M.F. (2009). Statistical Reasoning for everyday life, Third Edition…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 9-11

    • 1605 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Smart thinkers welcome their intuitions but when making complex decisions they gather as much information as possible and then take time to let their two track mind process the information.…

    • 1605 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Assignment Chapter 1

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages

    References: Robert. T. Clemen , Terrence Reilly, “Making Hard Decisions with Decision Tools”, Duxbury Press; 1 edition, Jun 2000…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    MSc Clinical Leadership

    • 5046 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Bnet (2008) How to Implement a Decision. [online]. Available at: http://jobfunctions.bnet.com/abstract.aspx?docid=359455 [Accessed 7 January 2010].…

    • 5046 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analysis

    • 1354 Words
    • 5 Pages

    For practical reasons, variables are observed to collect data. The sampled data is then analyzed to elicit information for decision making in business and indeed in all human endeavors. However, sampled information is incomplete and not free from sampling error. Its use in decision-making processes introduces an element of chance. Therefore, it is important for a decision-maker to know the amount of chance associated with a statistical decision of it being wrong. To quantify the amount of chance due to sampling error, basic probability concepts are indispensable via modeling sampled populations and testing of research hypotheses. Probability is the guide for a "good" life and successful business. The concept of probability occupies an important place in the decision-making process. Few decision making situations is perfect information - all the needed facts - available. Most decisions are made in the face of uncertainty. Probability enters into the process by playing the role of a substitute for certainty - a substitute for complete knowledge.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mgt/230 Week 1 Assignment

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages

    People should make decisions every day, some of those decisions are easy to make, while others are quite difficult to implement. An appropriately combined and organized decision-making process will help to control this issue and bring a positive outcome for those involved. The decision-making process may become challenging for people due to “the lack of structure and entail risk, uncertainly and conflict” (Bateman and Snell, 2012, p. 86). That is why people trying to make important personal or professional decisions should have an appropriate model to follow in order to avoid these challenges. Bateman and Snell identified six steps or stages of decision-making process which may be attached to any problem or decision. First, it is necessary to identify and analyze the problem.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Expert Systems

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The most recent addition to the circle of information systems is the expert system. Expert systems are associated with an area of research known as artificial intelligence. We introduced expert systems and artificial intelligence in the World of computers.” Artificial intelligence is the ability of a computer to reason, to learn, to strive for self-improvement, and to simulate human sensory capabilities. Like the DSS, expert systems are computer-based systems that help managers resolve problems or make better decisions. However, an expert system does this with a decidedly different twist. It is an interactive computer-based system that responds to questions, asks for clarification, makes recommendations, and generally helps the user in the decision-making process. In effect, working with an expert system is much like working directly with a human expert to solve a problem because the system mirrors the human thought process. It even uses information supplied by a real expert in a particular field such as medicine, taxes, or geology. An expert system applies preset IF-THN rules to solve a particular problem, such as determining a patient’s illness. Like management information systems and decision support systems, expert systems rely on factual knowledge, but expert systems also rely on heuristic knowledge such as intuition, judgment, and inferences. Both the factual knowledge and the heuristic rules of thumb are acquired from a domain expert, an expert in a particular field, such as jet engine repair, life insurance, or property assessment. The expert system uses this human-supplied knowledge to model the human taught process within a particular area of experience .Once completed, a knowledge-based system can approximate the logic of a well-informed human decision maker. Technically speaking; an expert system is the highest form of a knowledge-based system. In practice, the terms expert system and knowledge-based systems…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    | S. Liao, "Expert system methodologies and applications—," in Expert Systems with Applications (28), 2005, pp. 93-103.…

    • 15831 Words
    • 64 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Journal of Information Sciences Volume 27 (2001), The use of graphs as decision aids in relation to…

    • 10309 Words
    • 42 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introduction to Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems by Dan W. Patternson, PHI Pvt. Limited, Eighth Reprint 2000. [5] Expert Systems Theoty and Practices by Jean-Louis Ermine, PHp Publications, 2007 [6] Introduction to Expert Systems by Peter Jackson, Addison-Wesley, Pearson Education Asia ltd., Reprint 2000 [7] Foundation of Artificial Intelligences and Expert Systems" by V S Janakiraman, K Sarukesi, P Gopalakrishnan, Macmillan Series in Computed Science, Reprint 2001.…

    • 2229 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Best First Search

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages

    ^ a b Russell, Stuart J.; Norvig, Peter (2003), Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (2nd ed.), Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, ISBN 0-13-790395-2. pp. 94 and 95 (note 3).…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bayesian theory is increasingly being adopted by the data scientists and analysts across the world. Most of the times the data set available or the information is incomplete. To deal with this realm of inductive logic, usage of probability theory becomes essential. As per the new perceptions, probability theory today is recognized as a valid principle of logic that is used for drawing inferences related to hypothesis of interest. E.T. Jaynes in the late 20th century, shared the view of “Probability theory as logic”. Today this is commonly called Bayesian probability theory in recognition with the work done in the late 18th century by an English clergyman and mathematician Thomas Bayes. (Gregory, Phil;, 2010)…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    these classes has been stored into a relational data-base. For each input case, the system allows the physician find similar situations that…

    • 5221 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays