Preview

Decisions made by Germany's leaders did cause outbreak of WW1

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1381 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Decisions made by Germany's leaders did cause outbreak of WW1
To what extent were the decisions made by Germany’s leaders responsible for the outbreak of the First World War? Explain your answer, using sources 1,2 and 3 and your own knowledge of the issues related to this controversy.

Sources 1, 2 and 3 all bring different arguments to the opinion that the decisions made by Germany’s leaders were responsible for the outbreak of the First World War. Arguments such as the decisions made by Germany’s leaders caused outbreak, that diplomatic tension between the European countries caused outbreak and that pressure on Germany from inside the country caused outbreak are all presented in the sources and will be analysed in order to come to an evaluated conclusion.

The first opinion presented in the sources is that decisions made by Germany’s leaders were responsible for the outbreak of the First World War.
Source 1 partially agrees with this opinion, stating that ‘The German army and the government pushed for war before 1914’. This argues that the leaders of Germany and other important figures wanted war even before 1914, suggesting that plans and decisions made pre-1914 were made with the outbreak of a war in mind. Fischer’s argument of the War Council of December 1912 supports source 1 and shows that German leaders were discussing the prospect of war before 1914, and that the decisions made in that meeting such as the support of Austria-Hungary against Serbia caused the outbreak of war as it created sides, alliances and further tension in an already tense environment. Equally, the creation of the Schlieffen plan in 1905 to win the war in the West in six weeks shows how Germany were making decisions about war almost ten years before it happened, so were well aware of their decisions causing the outbreak of war.
Source 2 also partially agrees that the decisions made by Germany’s leaders were responsible for the outbreak of war as it states, ‘The argument of a preventative defense suggests that the Bethmann-Hollweg government

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The debate of Germanys responsibility for the outbreak of war first began with the charge of war guilt given in Article 231 of the Versailles Treaty. Germany rejected Article 231 and successfully campaigned against it as by 1950 it had become widely accepted that Germany where not solely responsible for the outbreak of war in 1914. The first source from Gordon Corrigan, Mud, Blood and Poppycock, published in 2003 addresses Germany’s “unconditional support” to Austria- Hungary to support the idea of Germany being the main reason for the outbreak of World War 1. In this source Corrigan refers to Fritz Fischer’s theory in which he argued that Germany’s leaders might not have been solely to for what happened in 1914 but hold a substantial share of the responsibility. Source 2 from L.F.C Turner, The Origins of the First World War, published in 1970 agrees with Source 1 by reinforcing that it was Germany’s support to Austria and the Blank Cheque that were vital in the starting of War. On the other hand, Source 3 from James Joll, The Origins of the First World War, published in 1984 disagrees with source 1 as Joll highlights the involvement of other countries with a main focus on Britain being a main factor in the cause of war. Source 2 agrees with this to some extent as it also discusses that Germany is not the only country that is responsible.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    DBQ world war 2

    • 2303 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Actions were taken that moved Europe toward war. The debate over the causes of World War II provides…

    • 2303 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    All of the sources give different impressions as to wether Germany's leaders are responsibe for the outbreak of the First World War. Source 1 seems to strongly suggest that German leaders and the German Government did in fact push for the war with Hewitson blaming the Army and suggesting that Germany was looking for an opportunity to start war however he does not fully support the view that German leaders were responsible.Porter and Armour (Source 2) strongly supports this view by again pointing to the millitary and prime minister Bethmann Hollweg looking for an opportunity to wage war but again not fully placing the blame on Germany but looking at the threating actions of Russia and Britain. In contrast to both Source 1 and 2 Norman Stone ( Source 3) does not blame Germany, instead he suggest that the tension in Europe for the last decade finally reached an ultimatum in the July crisis and the war was the fault of all Great powers.…

    • 899 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War 1 Dbq Analysis

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although Count Brockdorff-Rantzau, the German delegation leader believed that Germany was not at all responsible for world war one, the Treaty of Versailles take it that Germany is the one responsible for this war due to their loss(Doc.4). At the delegation to the Versailles Peace Conference the German delegation leader had protested that one of the causes of this war was imperialism. The method of imperialism added to the threat to other countries because of its policies of retaliation and expansion(Doc.5). As a result of there being an expansion throughout European nations, mobilization occurred. Mobilization lead to militarism adding to the factors of tension and threats. While, both the…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this essay, we will focus on the development of the events on The Western Front where Germany faced France. All the powers had thought and planned their war strategy very accurately.…

    • 1335 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The question of whether no single alliance or nation could be held responsible for the outbreak of war is a hotly debated topic. Source 2 strongly agrees with the statement giving the view that no one nation could be held responsible. However, source 1 gives the opposite view that German aggression was primarily responsible, which is supported, to a large extent by source 3, which highlights German imperialistic aims as being a key aggravator. However, it does also suggest that other great powers were also aggressive to some extent. This essay will focus on the idea that, primarily, German aggression was to blame.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has been some controversy as to what or who was to blame for the outbreak of the First World War. Some people have taken the opinion that the war arose as a result of “planned German aggression” such as sources two and three, whereas source one is of the opinion that the Germans went to war with “defensive” intentions and that they didn’t have any “special plan to dominate Europe”.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    World War 1 Cause Analysis

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This essay discusses the immediate cause for start of the first World War as well as the short and long term root causes. Besides, there will be analysis, whether this worldwide heinous conflict could have been avoided or not. Lastly, which nations are mainly responsible for the start of the first World War.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The outbreak of war in Europe in 1939 did not arise as a result of any one single event, but rather as a product of interconnected long term and short term issues. Early Nazi propaganda, the German policy of ‘Brinkmanship’ and the British policy of ‘appeasement’ resulted in a situation in which war was inevitable. Historians differ in opinions as to whether the outbreak of war in September 1939 was planned by the Nazi party, earlier than expected or contrary to their idea of gaining control in Europe.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The outbreak of the First World War occurred in 1914 and there are many reasons for why the outbreak happened. Blackbourn writes that Germany “had done much to create international tension” and this implies that Germany were responsible for the outbreak of war as tensions were rising between countries in Europe due to the relations they had with several other countries. This had a knock on effect due to the Alliance system which was in place so that countries were protected by their allies. It meant that any sort of conflict between two countries escalated quickly due to the countries across Europe being locked into an alliance. The importance of the Alliance system can be reinforced by L.F.C Turner who writes “Bethmann pushed Austria into a premature declaration of war” which suggests that Germany were responsible because they gave Austria a Blank Cheque which was Germany giving Austria permission to attack Serbia stating that they would help aid their attack on Serbia as they wanted the war to happen sooner rather than later. This is because they knew Russia was growing stronger and they were feeling encircled by the Triple Entente which was the alliances between Britain, France and Russia and they clearly felt threatened due to where they are placed geographically. Bethmann also writes in the source that Germany “built a battle fleet aimed at the British” which implies that Germany was aggressive…

    • 1056 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    cause of wwI dbq

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    At the turn of the twentieth century, Europe seemed to enjoy a period of peace and progress. Yet below the surface, several forces were at work that would lead Europe into the “Great War.” On of these forces was nationalism, and it had an explosive effect in the Balkans. But, nationalism was only one of the many causes of WWI. Historians and eye witnesses have described the causes of WWI and have tried to assess the responsibility for it. All wars occur because of basic political issues, such as nationalism, imperialism, alliances, militarism, and economics. World War I was no exception to this rule. Each of these played a part in bringing about The Great War. Along with these causes, all wars also have a spark and World War I is no different.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    <br>To analyse in depth Germany's guilt for the war we must first look at the most distant events and work our way up to the July crisis. To understand Germany's actions that lead to war we shall look first at its foreign policy, specifically from the point were Bismarck's policy ended in 1890.…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Finding the Middle Ground

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1914 is arguably one of the most influential years in human history. Not only did it introduce the world to the practice of total warfare, but it also demonstrated the devastating outcome of rising political and economic tensions in Europe, as well as the inevitable conflict that is rooted in our global anarchic system. Almost a century later, historians continue to study the catastrophic events that occurred in 1914 and one of the most controversial and sensitive topics is the debate on who is to blame for the outbreak of WWI. Many would be quick to point their finger at Germany, including historian Fritz Fischer, who validly argues that Germany was responsible for WWI based upon their nation’s political and militaristic aims to establish Germany as a world power. On the other hand, historian Paul Ritter questions Fischer’s argument, believing that Germany did not intentionally plan for WWI to occur. Both points are valid, yet the truth may not lie on either extreme sides of the spectrum. Rather, the long-term and short-term responsibility of WWI is shared between Germany, the conflictive nature of the world’s political system, and those nation states that exist within such a system during 1914. Therefore, the combination of a precarious political environment and an ambitious militaristic intention and course of action holds Germany highly, yet not completely, responsible for WWI.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One cause of World War I was Militarism. Germany had an industrialized military and spent millions of dollars trying improve and prepare them for war. Many other countries seen this newfound competition and started to try and rebuild their armies and navy so they could keep up. With Germany’s new and improved army, they started to gain confidence and were convinced that they could win a war. Germany was very focused on utilizing their army. As soon as the war declared, Germany without a doubt didn’t hesitate to “make the first move.” This caused a problem however because of the other nations rush to industrialize their armies and try to make them just as good or if not better than Germanys. Militarism played a huge part in the cause of World War I.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians have heavily debated the causes of the First World War. Fritz Fischer, author of Germany’s Aims in the First World War, wrote that Germany was undeniably responsible for the war. Fischer argues that Germany took advantage of the Austro-Serbian conflict in order to stage a preventive war, and pull herself out of European isolation. His research showed that Germany had similar aims in both WWI and WWII, setting out to consciously to become a world power.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics