While most all of the democrats supported the treaty, republicans in the Senate were divided into two groups. These were the "irreconcilables", or isolationists, and the reservationists. The irreconcilables, led by William Borah, were opposed to the treaty because it would commit American to other countries which would then bring foreign entanglements. They also argued that the "war to prevent war", as the basic principle of the League, was a profound mistake. The reservationists, led by Henry Cabot Lodge, opposed the treaty, but agreed with the idea of the League if amendments were made to the treaty itself. In an attempt to build up opposition of the treaty, Lodge delayed it through the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which was filled with Senators who opposed the treaty in any form. The main amendment reservationists wanted was to removed moral obligation of the US to Article X, which was practically the heart of the treaty. Both parties contributed to the downfall of the treaty as well as the growth of President Wilson's stubbornness. Wilson's inability to compromise was ultimately the true reason for the treaty's failure. Most everyone in the Senate was willing to compromise, as Lodge had suggested, but Wilson stood firm. He said that if Article X were to be impaired, it would go against the purpose of the war. With no intention of any type of compromise, Wilson began to deliver speeches all across the countries. After his tour, he suffered from and massive stroke that paralyzed him. With his inability to further fight for his treaty, many important ant newspapers began to favor Lodge's ideas. The Democrats who had agreed with the treaty to begin with, then started to question it. With the loss of support, the Treaty of Versailles failed.
Although popular opposition in the Senate contributed to the failure of the treaty of Versailles, it was President Woodrow Wilson's actions and mindset that was the breaking point. Disagreement in the Senate was where the problem began, but they were willing to work for a compromise. Since Wilson stood his ground and did not budge on any type of change, the treaty had no chance. If he would have compromised instead of being stubborn, there may have been a different outcome. Even World War II could have possibly been avoided. The issue of the Treaty of Versailles began with popular opposition and the Senate, but it was President Wilson's mindset and actions that ultimately caused its failure.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
After the Senate rejected the Treaty twice, the Treaty of Versailles was defeated. The Lodge-Wilson personal feud, traditionalism, isolationism, disillusionment, and partisanship all contributed to the defeat of the…
- 1052 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
* President Wilson saw the problems that arose with the treaty and placed hopes in the League of Nations…
- 8194 Words
- 33 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
After the end of World War One, President Woodrow Wilson sought national support for his idea of a League of Nations. He took his appeal directly to the American people in the summer of nineteen nineteen.…
- 357 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The United States had entered World War I against many wishes of the American public, which made the ratification for the peace agreement an even more difficult task. Woodrow Wilson justified American involvement by claiming that an Ally victory would ensure a new world order. The war would be used as an instrument to "make the world safe for democracy". However, many Americans, government officials, and even the Allies did not agree with the progressive ideals that would be enforced to attain the peace that Wilson had desired and promised. This was made evident when Wilson's negotiations for the peace treaty were criticized and rejected by the leaders of the other Allied nations and isolationists. Even when Wilson acknowledged objections against his proposals, he refused to accept any compromises or different versions of the treaty. Therefore, both the inflexibility of Wilson and strength of the opposition forces led to the defeat of the Treaty of Versailles.…
- 1033 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Coming out of World War I, the United States emerged as the most powerful nation in the world. The president at this time was the Progressive Woodrow Wilson. Wilson came up with a plan for long lasting peace at the conclusion of the war called the Fourteen Points. One of these points was the League of Nations which was Wilson's favorite thing. This part of Wilson's plan stated, "A general association of nations must be formed under specific covenants for the purpose of affording mutual guarantees of political independence and territorial integrity to great and small states alike." However, the United States never signed the Treaty of Versailles and never became a member of the League of Nations. Opposition against Wilson's plans…
- 858 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Senate had collectively rejected the treaty twice and it was defeated. Document E represents a political cartoon where the US Senate stops Wilson from creating foreign entanglements or the “wedding”. However, Wilson stubbornly decided to settle the treaty issue in the presidential campaign of 1920. W.E.B. Du Bois mentioned in “The League of Nations”, “Because of the idiotic way in which the stubbornness of Woodrow Wilson and the political fortunes of the Republicans became involved, the United States was not represented.”(Document H), for it really seemed like Wilson was only trying to get his way. If voters elected a Democrat, then this would mean the treaty was actually supported. The Republicans chose Senator Warren G. Harding as their presidential candidate for the election of 1920. Their vice-presidential candidate was Governor Calvin Coolidge. Democrats nominated Governor James. M. Cox for president (who was pro-league) and they chose Franklin D. Roosevelt for vice-president. Ironically, Warren Harding won the election of 1920 which led to the final death of the League of Nations. The reason why stubbornness was NOT the greater cause of the treaty’s defeat, is that the stubbornness was only the “icing on the cake” for the political battle between oppositions prevented it or Wilson would have had his…
- 1140 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Many believe that Lincoln was the main or only reason that the proposal was rejected. He was very convincing in explaining why it was a bad idea. He is the reason that the Republicans unanimously rejected the proposal (Document T). Similarly to his party members, Lincoln was very determined and unbending when it came to his views. (Document L) He was firmly against slavery and refused to compromise when it came to this issue. (Document S) Republicans saw that the secessionists did not see how bad slavery truly was and wanted to they wanted to prevent slavery from spreading further. (Document N) He said that slavery shall not be extended by any means under any circumstances. (Document C) In the election, Lincoln had the most electoral votes and the most popular votes, showing that the people (mainly the Northern Republicans) supported him and agreed with his views. (Document B) At the same time, Republicans believed that popular sovereignty was dangerous. (Document J)…
- 450 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
After reading Thomas A. Bailey’s article on “Woodrow Wilson Wouldn’t Yield”, I feel this quote best represents exactly what Woodrow Wilson stood for. He was a man who wanted peace and would not yield for anyone or any country unless it was best for him and our country. In Tomas A. Bailey’s article, his argument that Wilson’s fourteen points and most notably the League of Nations wasn’t passed not just because of the points themselves. But because of Wilson’s failure to see little changes and revisions to his plans, the League would have fallen through, instead of pitfall in the Senate like it did. “On March 4, 1919 - 39 Senators or Senators-Elect, more than enough to defeat the treaty-published a round robin to the effect that they would not approve the League of Nations in its existing form. Bailey also argues that Wilson’s character, in that his huge desire for morality and idealism, we also much to blame for his stubbornness in keeping the League of Nations unrevised or compromised upon.…
- 541 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Wilson’s egoism lead to his refusal to become a leader in the negotiations to change the terms of Article Ten. Ultimately, this lead to the Treaty of Versailles’ death. Before the first Senate vote on the Treaty of Versailles, President Wilson and Senator Gilbert M. Hitchcock privately worked out a series of reservations that would allow for a compromise between the Reservationists and the Internationalists. Continuously, Hitchcock urged Wilson to go public with the reservations they had worked out (Bailey, 188). Instead of taking Hitchcock’s advice, Wilson simply said, “let Lodge compromise” (Bailey, 189). Wilson refused to be the one to step-up and start the discussion between the Reservationists and Internationalists to get the Treaty passed. In fact, Wilson believed that Lodge should have started to compromise first. If Wilson had put his ego aside and focused on what was important, the Treaty of Versailles would have been passed, but his stubbornness and refusal to become the leader he should have been caused the Treaty’s death. For the same reason Wilson did not step up and start negotiations between the two sides, he also did not step up to try to continue negotiations Lodge started. After the first vote on the Treaty of Versailles, Senator Lodge started secret discussions with Democrats in order to negotiate a compromise. However, Senator Borah found out that Lodge was taking part in these negotiations and accused him of treachery. Lodge had to stop the negotiations because of Borah’s accusations and his threat to re-elect a majority leader (Bailey, 189-199). If Wilson had stepped in between Borah and Lodge, the negotiations could have continued between the two parties and the majority of the Senate would have been able to agree on a version of the Treaty. If Wilson had put aside his ego and desire for Article Ten to be exactly as he had written it,…
- 954 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Was Woodrow Wilson responsible for the failure of the United States to join the League of Nations?…
- 819 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Henry Clay, supported by President Fillmore, created a compromise with the purpose of peacefully defusing the arguments that arose because of the war. However, Congress refused to pass this initial attempt. Fredrick Douglas would not let this answer stand, so he discovered a way to pass is through. He divided Clay’s bill into…
- 882 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
At the end of WW1 there were many issues that needed to be sorted out. The winning allies, George Clemenceau, Lloyd George and Woodrow Wilson all knew that this had to be settled in a peace treaty. They each had different items on their agenda that they wanted to be included in the Treaty of Versailles.…
- 713 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
on the grounds that it did not reflect their own concerns or from a fear that…
- 468 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In 1919, as the destructive World War I came to an end, many countries wanted to be paid back for their loss in the war. Not knowing who to target to pay for this mass destruction, many European countries decided to blame the entire war on the formerly powerful Germany. Many European countries gathered and wrote a treaty, later known as the treaty of Versailles for the Germans to sign. The European countries created an unfair treaty that punished Germany more than it deserved; the suppression of Germans justified the Germans rebellion that lead to the world’s second tragic war.…
- 631 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
It was unfortunate that the covenant of the League of Nations was made a part parcel of the peace settlement. It would have been better if it had kept separate. There were many states which consider the Treaty Of Versailles as a treaty of revenge, and were not prepared to ratify the same. By not retifying the treaty , they refused to be the members of the League.…
- 433 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays