Preview

Defining Crime and Deviance

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
406 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Defining Crime and Deviance
Defining Crime and Deviance

1. What does it mean to suggest that ‘deviance’ and/or ‘crime’ are social constructs?
A social construct is defined as a social phenomenon or category which is created and developed by society - an idea which is ‘constructed’ through cultural or social practice. Since the Labour Government were in power 3600 laws have been introduced and it is said that this is due to society constantly changing its views on various issues such as smoking inside in public places. To say that deviances and crimes are social constructs is to say that rules and laws change due to changing views within society.
Emile Durkheim, one of the founders of sociology took a functionalist approach and believed that crime and deviance are social constructs. He said that crime and deviance are not natural obvious categories, they are concepts introduced to the world by humans and societies. Durkheim believed that the moral basis of society is formed from the norms, beliefs and values, otherwise known as the collective consciousness. He viewed crime as serving a social function, with deviance helping to form this collective conscience of what is right and what is wrong, and that it is our collective response to this deviance which establishes social norms and shapes society’s morality. He said that crime and deviance are social things, which cannot be understood unless you acknowledge that they are socially constructed.
From an interactionist perspective behavior is criminalized by a process of social perception and reaction as applied and interpreted by the legislators. Crime is not what people do, but how they are perceived and evaluated by others.
A key element to this thought is that norms and behaviours are culturally and historically bound. As already touched upon, what is considered deviant behavior in one society or in one period of time may have been perfectly acceptable 20 years ago or may be in another culture today. For example, views on animal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    When studying crime and deviance, in particular the causes of crime, it is often useful to look at the reasons behind why people commit crimes in the first place. For interactionists, crime and deviance is a product of labelling. They believe that when a crime is committed, it is because a public application of a negative description of a powerless individual has occurred and that is the reason why a crime has been committed by that individual. Labelling is deterministic of your future life. Interactionists reject official statistics on crime, seeing them as little more than a social construction. They maintain that they vastly underestimate the extent of crime and do not present an accurate picture of crime in society.…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functionalist approach towards crime & deviance is seen as a top down approach as it looks at society as a whole, stating that criminal behaviour is caused by society itself except from being caused through an individual’s biology & psychology. Durkheim sees deviance as inevitable also being necessary for our society, however other perspectives such as Marxist & Feminist may state otherwise.…

    • 550 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conley in his chapter over Social Control and Deviance make a sociologic approach to criminology and society. He also demonstrates approaches to the subject from various points of views of different sociologists such as Emilee Durkheim, Foucault, and Robert Merton. To Conley, the transgressions of the society norms such as crimes can vary from a culture to another culture, context, or with the divisions of labor as people get more professionally specialized. This labor division introduces a concept made by Emilee Durkheim, in which the society was divide in two system called Organic Solidary and Mechanical Solidarity.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his first chapter, Erikson gives regard to a foremost leader in sociology; Emile Durkheim. As he notes, crime is really a natural kind of social activity. If crime is a natural part of society, there is definitely an indication that it is necessary, much like Darwin would argue that survival of the fittest is pertinent to the continuation of a species. Erikson claims that non-deviants come together in a phenomenal way to express outrage over deviants, therefore solidifying a tighter bond between eachother. This sense of mutuality, Erikson further explains, reiterates awareness to the common goals of the social organization at stake. In his analysis of “abnormal behavior”, deviance is defined as conduct which the people of a group consider so dangerous or embarrassing that they bring special sanctions against those persons. Furthermore, Erikson gives the title of “community” to this form of social unit.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has been a pleather of research regarding the issue of crime and deviance. A definition of crime and deviance can be explained in relative terms which are dependant on any particular society’s interpretation of crime and deviance. Cultures differ from one society to another and the general consensus of right and wrong can also evolve throughout time. Definitions of crime and deviance can evolve with factors such as time, pace and society. However the general definition of crime is that its an act that breaks the law and deviance refers to behaviour that most people see as differing from acceptable social norms or standards of society. The purpose of this Essay is to outline and assess what each perspectives view of crime and deviance is. The perspectives that will be in this essay are Functionalists, Interactionists and conflict theories.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although Durkheim’s theory is valid, some criticisms are found. He proposed that crime promotes solidarity; however, this is not always the case, as sometimes crime can have the opposite effect. For example; state crime. Durkheim also believed that crime is functional for society as a whole; however, crime might not be functional to everyone. For example, the victim himself. Durkheim proposed that a certain amount of deviance in society is beneficial, but too much is damaging, however, he never indicated how much is enough. The main criticism is that Durkheim never explained…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Durkheim looks at how crime and deviance is inevitable and needed in society as it performs two important positive functions: boundary maintenance and adaptation and change, he says that boundary maintenance is when society reacts to crime and there is social cohesion, and this leads to society condemning the criminal and the punishment given by the social agencies is a way of reaffirming societies shared rules and reinforce social solidarity. The media portrays the court case and the punishment; this acts a way of informing members of society and discourages others from rule breaking. Adaptation and change for Durkheim is when an individual has an idea or belief which is seen to be deviant by rest of the members of society, they fight and challenge the existing norms and values, in time there values may give way to a new culture and morality and not seen as deviant anymore such as cohabiting couples would be seen as deviant due to the couples not been married but in current times it is not deviant as it is more popular in society. These changes in values and in society allow society to progress and evolve. Furthermore Durkheim acknowledges that crime and deviance are inevitable because not everyone is socialized in the same way with the same norms and values. Functionalism is useful as it…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Within the sociological perspectives of crime and deviance, there is one particular approach which argues that crime is functional, inevitable and normal. This sociological perspective, Functionalism, consists of Emile Durkheim’s work on crime and deviance. His main argument was that ‘crime is normal’ and that it is ‘an integral part of all healthy societies’. This perspective views crime and deviance as an inevitable feature of all societies which is universal. However, Durkheim did argue that too much crime can lead to the destabilisation of society.…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Theories are useful tools, which suggest the way things are and not the way things ought to be, we can use them to help us to understand the world around us. In terms of criminal and deviant behaviour the theories proposed in this subject area set out to try and give reason as to why an individual commits criminal or delinquent acts. In this essay I will be using biological, psychological and sociological explanations of criminality to suggest why individuals take part in criminal behaviours.…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime and deviance are always been a matter of fact, the ‘collateral effect’ of living among other people. Norms and rules are set in each society, from rural ones to the largest urban environments, but this cannot prevent the attitudes by some individuals, that in the most of case gang up, to not follow these norms. They are the deviant ones and they are condemned to be considered not normal, sometimes just without choosing that. Paradoxically, most of actions and situations that are considered as normal, under a more peculiar analysis may be not so ‘normal’. For example, the norms that consider smoking as a ‘crime’ are the ones that ban this action in public places, since smoking is injurious both to yours and to the others’ health but, in…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Functionalism is a theoretical orientation which views society as a system of interdependent parts whose functions contribute to keep society alive and stable. Crime has been a part of society since the beginning and yet we have not done anything drastic to reduce or even remove it because it is needed for society to function normally. Crime has become the somewhat normal in society because of it creates employment opportunities for everyone. Law enforcement, lawyers and judges, security guards all have jobs built around the negativity of crime. People commit crimes for personal reasons such as to support family, themselves, and/or drug addictions. There are endless reasons to why people commit crimes. When a crime has been committed, it disrupts social by changing the normal function of society.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deviance In Sociology

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Durkheim explains that crime in society display to people the difference between right and wrong, and what acts are breaking social-norms. Durkheim also stated that crime encourage group against group, in other words, the good against the bad. As an example in terrorist attacks, the crime of terrorism separates society from the good individuals against the bad people (terrorists) which also has an effect in having them punished and looked down upon. Another theory Durkheim has explained is the fact of being deviant and going against society to reach out for a change, this may be things such as protests. Durkheim has also said that minor law breaking and being deviant every now and then in our lives reduces stress and anger and helps us to lead better and healthier lives. Durkheim is not saying that crime is good, but rather that is serves good in society. Durkheim’s theory is somewhat about a normative theory but mainly it comes from the labeling perspective. The normative theory applies in the way that the social norms provide a guide for what is normal in society and how individuals should act, and why they get broken in society. The labeling perspective is what helps the society regarding crime; the labeling perspective focuses on the social audience and how they react to the crime. Many of Durkheim’s theories relate exactly to this, how crime shows…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Early Functionalist ideas, as seen in Item A, are interested in explaining why some people in society break the rules and overall see crime as a group activity. The following approaches see the deviant as simply reacting to external forces largely beyond their control and see crime and deviance as social facts that can be measured in society.…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society crime does more than expose the weakness in social relationships it undermines the social order itself by destroying assumptions on which it is based (Schnalleger, Chapter 1 what is criminal justice, 2011). Society has many different definitions of crime. The text states that crime is conduct in violation of the criminal laws of a state, the federal government or, local jurisdiction, for which there is no legally acceptable justification or excuse (Schnalleger, Chapter what is criminal justice, 2011). There are many models of how society determines which act are criminal, but the two most common are consensus…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Crime is a definition of behavior that is conferred on some persons by others (Robinson, 2005). These crimes are some what of the same and may be view differently…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics