In Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet look past
their differing labels and love each other. Even when Juliet finds out that she kissed her enemy, she continues to pursue her feelings, as she realizes that one is not defined by his name. After Juliet learns that the stranger she kissed is a Montague she says, “thou art thyself, though not a Montague” (II.ii.42). In saying that, Juliet states that Romeo is himself, not solely a Montague. There are many other aspects of Romeo besides his name. Juliet continues and says “that which we call a rose by any other word would smell as sweet” (II.ii.46-47). Juliet says that renaming a rose would not affect its sweetness. Therefore, Romeo would still have all the same qualities he possesses, even if he were not named Romeo or a Montague. This shows Juliet’s advanced understanding that one part of a person should not define them. In addition, it shows her unwavering love for Romeo, despite their feuding families.
Classifications and labels are relevant today as more people become open about characteristics they have that may differ from what is considered to be normal. Hate crimes targeting members of the LGBTQ community are the third most reported hate crime to the FBI. As people become aware that there is an entire spectrum of genders and sexualities, they must attempt to accept differences. Not only should people accept others’ differences, they should not attempt to categorize or identify people by one small factor. Human beings are composed of a variety of factors and each contributes to their overall persona. The idea that one is not defined by a singular factor is present in Romeo and Juliet and is a lesson that modern day people can learn.