Preview

Dehumanization of Armenian Genocide

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1471 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dehumanization of Armenian Genocide
Victor Mardikian
Mr. Reese 4A
Honors World History
13 May 2013
Armenian Genocide 1915-1923
After their defeat in the Balkan War, the Ottomans lost not only their European territories, but also their pride and self-importance. To regain their pride in nationalism, they felt it necessary to impose their culture, language and especially, their religion on the minority, the Armenians. The Armenians were designated to a second-class citizenship, had to abide inequalities, and endure special hardships. As nationalism increased in Europe and the Ottoman Empire, the Armenians became more isolated as a Christian minority. A Pan-Turkic nationalistic movement emerged that wanted to assimilate or annihilate the Armenians. As the Armenians sought independence and better treatment, the Turkish government instead treated the Armenians more and more severely, progressively leading to their genocide. In addition, the Turks wanted to acquire the wealth and prosperity of the Armenians for the Muslims and the Turkish government. The Central Committee of Union and Progress (CUP), the controlling party of the government, implemented the eradication of the Armenians from the Ottoman Empire, resulting in two and half million deaths. Dehumanization in the Armenian genocide is the result of ethnocentrism, objectification of Armenians, and moral disengagement by the Central Committee of Union and Progress.
The importance of nationalism to the Ottomans brought about the dissolution of the multi religion/ethnic Empire and transformed it into a Turkish nation-state based on a mono-religion/ethnic empire. Enver Pasha, a member of the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP), predicted the possibility of the collapse of the nation and claimed that the “non Turkish elements within the country had shown themselves to be opposed to the empire’s continued existence” (Akçam xiv). In order to preserve the state, measures had to be taken against them. “Non Turkish elements” were “an internal



Cited: Akçam, Taner. A shameful act: the Armenian genocide and the question of Turkish responsibility. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2006. Print. Akçam, Taner. The Young Turks ' crime against humanity: the Armenian genocide and ethnic cleansing in the Ottoman Empire. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2012. Print. "Armenian Genocide | World Without Genocide." Armenian Genocide | World Without Genocide. N.p., n.d. Web. 7 May 2013. "Armenian Genocide." Armenian Genocide. N.p., n.d. Web. 7 May 2013. <http://www.armenian-genocide.org/genocide.html>. "Armenian Genocide." History.com. A&E Television Networks, n.d. Web. 7 May 2013. "Genocide Museum | The Armenian Genocide Museum-institute." Genocide Museum | The Armenian Genocide Museum-institute. N.p., n.d. Web. 7 May 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The movie highlights the extermination of Armenians from the Ottoman Empire during World War I. It uses newspaper articles, photographs, personal statements and experts in the topic to discuss Turkey’s denial of the genocide to this day. In class we discussed how the Young Turks led the Ottoman Empire during WWI and used the war as a cover-up. The documentary discussed the genocide as a result of the civil war between Muslims and Christians. The government rationalized this by stating that the genocide never occurred, it was just a removal of the Armenians from the border. This would give Russians access to the Ottoman Empire through the Black Sea. They feared that the Armenians would ally with the enemies, the Russians, in hope to use Russian aid to create nationalized stated for the Armenians. I found this interesting because of the pull between these two reasoning for the killing of numerous Armenians.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Self determination for countries that were once part of the Turkish and Austro-Hungarian empires.…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lucas,Avila Ms.Muscat ENG2D 30 May, 2017 Armenian Genocide Changes Boy's Life Forever The Armenian genocide changed one boy's life forever, Vahan Kenderian, a 12 year old boy who was the black sheep of his family soon realises the good times have run out.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    An American first coined the word genocide in 1944 for all the Jewish that were killed in World War Two. A similar type of killing occurred in April of 1915 during World War One. The Armenians were victims of genocide during the 1st world war by the Turks. Turkey did not always deny about the killings of Armenians, but it has changed its stance on what happened during World War One. Is it right for Turkey to deny what happened to the Armenians during World War One since they were part of the Ottoman Empire at the time or wrong since it is denying a part of their history? I believe that it is wrong for Turkey to deny the genocides of…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mass Killing Summary

    • 2299 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Shaw argues that studies on genocide have concentrated too heavily on the specific perpetrators and victims with regard to intentions and identities respectively. Instead, he wants to propose that the crime of genocide should be understood within the structure of conflict situations. The most important aspect of genocide studies from the point of view of politics is that the concept of genocide must be clarified, Shaw believes that scholarship should provide this elucidation. By returning to the original definition proposed by Lemkin, the focus is more generally on attacks by the armed against the unarmed. Shaw states that “Lemkin invented ‘genocide’ because he wanted to describe – and highlight for countervailing action – a general class of violent actions.” Taking lessons from one of the most influential studies on war by Carl von Clausewitz, Shaw sees genocide as a form of war directed against civilians. Debates about genocide have certainly advanced since the introduction of the term, yet, Shaw feels these debates from the 1940s onwards have lost two very key aspects of the original concept. In agreement with Lemkin the omission of cultural genocide or social destruction meaning not just physically but a way of life and how genocide relates to war are vital in understanding the nature of the crime. He argues that “Genocide always involves physical violence but it involves many other things as well. Defining genocide by killing misses the social aims that lie behind it. Genocide involves mass killing but it is much more than mass killing.” Similar to some of the arguments made by Claudia Card in relation to the inclusion of cultural genocide, Shaw’s assertion that genocide must be viewed in the context of war provides a valuable framework for understanding the particular violence against civilians. The use of word civilians here is important for Shaw, rather than the UN Genocide…

    • 2299 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thet Sambath

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages

    History has been no stranger to the multitude of genocides and mass killings in countries all over the world and for various reasons. There are infinite ways to narrate the occurrence of these atrocities; however, they are most frequently characterized as either purposive or illness narratives determined by the culture that is creating the retelling of these experiences. Genocide can be defined as "the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation;" therefore to neglect the impact of culture in the created narrative depicting these atrocities would be deemed ignorant, primarily due to the fact that genocide and mass killings…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Adolf Hitler left a ruinous impression on the Jewish history. With over 40,000 construction camps and the slaughter of over 6 million Jews, he traumatized the culture. Eliezer Wiesel was one of those victims. To be beaten nearly to death, dehumanized, and to lose himself was tragic. During the Holocaust, all Jews were dehumanized and in Night by Elie Wiesel reveals this.…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Armenian Genocide is a genocide that happened amid and soon after the First World War, from 1914 to 1918, which brought on the passing of 1,5 million Armenians in the Ottoman Empire as an immediate result from the Young Turks' administration's arrangements to free the Turkish grounds of Christian populace to accomplish their container Turkic dreams.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “The Charge: Genocide” by Lydia Polgreen and “Armed & Underage” by Jeffrey Gettleman, a claim that could be made is No real justice is being done for the people. So, Even though people responsible are undergoing investigation, children are still being forced to fight for their government and people are still being threatened by genocide. Including , According to “Armed & Underage” by Jeffrey Gettleman it states, “While the number of conflicts involving child soldiers has dropped since 2004 from 27 to 15, human-rights experts estimate that more than 200,000 children worldwide are still being used as combatants, usually against their will. And it isn't just boys: Girls are often pressed into duty as cooks or messengers. Many are…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice In The Holocaust

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Large numbers of genocides go unheard, and often help does not come until after the genocide is over. Why does the world not intervene quicker? One genocide that many do not know about is the Armenian Genocide. The Armenians lived in Turkey and were not treated equally, yet they still had higher income and education rates. As well as that, Native Turks disliked for their Christianity because most Turks were Muslim. In 1908, the current Sultan at the time was overthrown by a new political party, who called themselves the Young Turks ("Armenian Genocide"). This made things worse for the Armenians because they wanted to get rid of all the non-Turkish citizens. Later in 1915, the Turks joined World War I, and in the same year the genocide had started. The Armenians were driven out and killed. Hundreds of thousands of women and children were driven for months over mountains and deserts, often dehumanized by being stripped naked and repeatedly preyed upon and abused" ("Summary of the…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Armenian genocide was one of the most deadly genocides in history. In 1915, The Turkish government started a several year massacre that claimed the lives of nearly 1.5 million Armenians. The Armenians were viewed as infidels in the eyes of the Ottoman rulers. Different Armenian leaders were gathered and executed, which was the beginning of the massacre. Although some countries and people do not view this as a genocide, it should not have happened because the Armenians were only scapegoats to the problems occurring in the Ottoman Empire, in result 1.5 million lives were taken, and it was a crime against mankind.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On April 24, 1915, the Ottoman government started its systematic decimation of its Armenian population. With the decline of power in the Ottoman Empire and military losses experience at the beginning of World War I, the Ottoman government used the Armenians as a way to blame their problems on someone else, thus began the Armenian Genocide. The Ottoman government confiscated Armenian possessions, deported them to different countries, and massacred large numbers of Armenian people. Many of the deported people died of starvation, and for the Armenians who did live, they witnessed brutalities that we could not imagine. By the time these horrible events did stop in 1918, around 1.5 million Armenians had died. The Turkish government, which was part…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Holocaust the main targets for the Nazi’s (us) were the Jews(them), Eastern Europeans, Gypsies, Jehovah Witness. They were classified as the ’weaker’ race.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Armenian Genocide

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Again, many will ask, why? Why would the Muslims think that the solution to their problems with the Christians would be the extermination of them? Why did the Turkish people kill people by the hundreds and still feel no remorse if they believe in sinning? Whether it be due to fear or hatred, the acts of violence committed by the Muslim people of the empire changed the lives of many and most times cannot be justified or explained. The Armenian Genocide is proof that religious violence has occurred over the last one hundred years, despite the advances made in the world. People in today’s society should look to the Armenian Genocide to see the atrocities and learn from them, so that as the world develops we can act more justly and treat people equally, regardless of their religious…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kurdish Genocide

    • 1708 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Kurds are located in the Middle East within several countries: Turkey, Syria, Iraq and surrounding lands. The raid on the Kurdish people first started in the 7th century with the conquering of their land by the Arabs (Rutgers, 2013). From the 7th century until the late 13th century, their lands were occupied by several different groups. From the 13th century until World War 1, the Ottoman Empire was in control of their lands. As you can see, up to this point in time, the Kurdish people as a whole have been controlled for over a thousand years. After World War 1 and the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, the Treaty of Sevres was proposed to divide the land and the Kurdish people would finally regain a place to call their home (Rutgers, 2013). However, that treaty folded and the Kurds were not given land. The history of their people can be defined as being oppressed and separated as a whole. In the late 20th century, we’ll see how the violence aspect impacted the Kurds and only further pushed the movement against the Kurds into genocide.…

    • 1708 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays