The defense presented examples of Native American schools that used the term “redskins” as a mascot or a phrase related to its sports programs. They also sought to prove that the term is a sign of respect and not a derogatory word. In regards to the linguistics experts, the defense presented claims that the word had been taken out of the common language and therefore did not correlate to a negative…
In the blog Not for Sport by Barbara Munson, the argument is presented that teams should not use “Indian” mascots. Using a statement and response dialogue Munson argues against what she feels are “common misunderstandings on this issue” (Munson 1). Munson uses ethos, pathos and logos with weak results. Munson’s target audience are the general population and more specifically communities with current “Indian” mascots and leaders in those communities.…
The origin of the ‘Redskin’ term is widely debated by scholars the NFL and racists alike.…
The general argument made by John McWhorter in “Why ‘Redskins’ Is a Bad Word” is that not every thing you say about race is offensive but you should be careful. He states, “It may not be mean to tell someone their skin happens to be reddish. But it’s mean to call someone a Redskin (6)” This shows that he doesn’t believe that every thing referred to the color of your skin is “racist” but a slur is. McWhorter also believes that there are better alternatives from words like Redskin. He shows us “ ‘crippled’ had a less neutral connotation after a while, upon ‘handicap’ was a fine substitute (6)” This shows us that he thinks that there can be healthier substitutes than Redskins. I think Mr. McWhorter’s thought process isn’t logical at times and…
Initially, all actions that are made should be made with the best outcome, not demonstrated in trying to ban all mascots for teams and schools. In the cartoon “ Mascots” Phil Hands informs caucasians that mascots for teams and schools is wrong because we disrespect the culture and the Native Americans. The author refuses to take action. By making a school bill board discriminating Americans, Hands states, “It’s not meant to be offensive”. The author is representing how they feel towards caucasians. The action of the cartoon is virtue ethic, even though we use mascots for teams and schools we don’t disrespect Native Americans or their heritage. A school or team can use a Native American mascot as long as we don't disrespect them or their heritage.…
Indian's today are treated better these days than in the past. But, unfournately Indian’s today still face challenges. Indians today have high rates of poverty and unemployment. The federal government is still stripping Native people of their land. In America, we have sports teams called the Redskins which is offensive to Native Americans. It is ethic stereotyping We do not see sports team called Caucasian. When sports teams…
In the summer of 2005, the NCAA banned the use of mascots that could be considered offensive to American Indians at any of their championship games. In order to understand this, it is important to consider that movies and television programs for years portrayed them as savage warriors that were feared and misunderstood. That is why some schools have chosen to use Indians as their mascot, a role typically played by wild animals or fictional beasts. You would not tolerate derogatory terms for other ethnic groups being used for school mascots. In the NCAA’s new ruling, they ask schools to eliminate mascots that may be hurtful or offensive to America’s Indian…
“The Redskins”, “The Blackhawks”, “The Cleveland Indians”, and other sport teams/organizations have very offensive derogatory mascots and slurs towards Native Americans. Many Native Americans are very offended by these sports team using their culture in a very racists way. They argue that Native Americans are people not mascots, and they also portray their body features very “savagely”. The redskin, feather in the hair, old wrinkled skin, war paint, etc. all these features are stereotypes and disrespectful.…
The use of Indian culture by non-Indians as mascots, logos, and nicknames has been a constant fight for years. Schools have been using names of tribes with aggressive, stoic histories for their sports teams. But the Native Americans look at that and feel discriminated against, because of the negative stereotype given by that type of label.…
This next year many communities might lose their spirit with in. With a simple swipe of a pen people will lose their past. The argument over the mascot name change of the Redskin. Many people of “Change the Mascot!” Campaign disagree with the “Redskin” name that it is a racial slur, and dishonoring there cultural background, although these schools have never dishonored the name but, support them, decorate their town in there colors, and mascot logo in respect we shouldn't change the name because they are taking away from the community's pride and tradition. To many communities the redskin isn't just there local grade school, high school, or college mascot but important symbol.…
We all know that racism still exists in today's society, despite our best efforts to believe otherwise. This is evident in the stereotyping of Native Americans. Florida State University is home of the Seminoles. Their mascot, and school for that matter, help perpetuate these stereotypes by using drum beating, war-whooping and symbolic scalping as part of the celebration rituals displayed by the mascot at halftime and on the sidelines. The band also partakes in this during the game. The "Indians" being portrayed here exist on in the imagination and in Hollywood. Nothing about it is historically…
Fryberg and Watts argue that American Indian mascots are harmful to actual American Indians, and that they should be gotten rid of. They argue that these inaccurate displays affect their mental health negatively, and make them not know who they and their people truly are. I agree that American Indian mascots should be thrown out because they are disrespectful cultural-appropriation and as it is actually hurting people, then it should not be allowed.…
The material I have selected to analyze is “Bonding Over a Mascot” on page 632. This essay remonstrates that the Florida State University’s mascot, the Seminole, is a derogatory representation of a certain Native Indian tribe called the Seminoles. The school mascot represents the era when the Seminoles and United States were at war. For some this mascot connects the past history of Seminole culture and Florida State’s sports, but for others it creates a disputation of Native American stereotypes.…
The Navajo Native americans are no different when being effected. According to Ariz Flagstaff, “the Navajo Nation is seeking potentially millions of dollars from Urban Outfitters Inc. over clothing, jewelry and other merchandise bearing the tribe's name that the popular retailer has sold.”. The cultural appropriation made by one of the mass clothing retailers, is a controversial matter. However, they have refused to see the negative impact this has on the Navajo tribe, culturally. This show’s how not just the government but society has taken advantage of their culture. Their key trait that establishes their culture is neglected, thus affecting how future generations will see their culture. In addition to the effects on culture, the government…
Native Americans have had a huge impact on history and racial relations since they have been on the North American continent for over 10,000 years. They have been discriminated against since the colonial era. The racism against these people was legally sanctioned due to greed. These people have endured the Indian Wars, Native American reservations, segregation, residential schools, slavery, and internment camps. They have been banned from white schools, from public facilities and restaurants, and all kinds of establishments and businesses. Finally, beginning in the mid – 20th century formal racial discrimination has been banned, making it unacceptable and morally repugnant.…