Preview

Deja Vu

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1969 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Deja Vu
Crystal Riddell
Susan Datz
PHI 101
June 21, 2008
Socrates and Déjà Vu
Slide 3- Lived Prior Lives: What happens to the soul when we die? Does the soul come back into the form of another body? How is someone born already knowing certain things? Let’s take a look at some of these questions by first looking at a man named Socrates.
Point 1- Law of opposites: Socrates believed that human beings have lived prior lives so to try to explain and validate the point on living prior lives he used the law of opposites. The Law of Opposites shows how everything in the universe must have an opposite. “And the weaker comes from the stronger and the faster from the slower”. (134)
Point 2 -“that the living come into being again from the dead” (133)
Using the law of opposites Socrates is able to explain that the opposite of death is life so one must reenter the world from the land of the dead.
Point 3- What is remembered from previous lives?
Socrates advised that if ones soul had not deceased from the previous life wouldn’t some information be retained to the next life?
Point 4- Knowledge: Socrates advised that all knowledge that has ever been known and will ever be known is already preexistent in your memory; thus time is an illusion, merely the unfolding process of remembering everything.

Slide 4- Recollecting Prior knowledge: Is the learning process simply re-gathering previous information?
Point 1- Theory of Recollection: Well, Socrates uses the Theory of Recollection to further show that before one is born the knowledge is already there. One is never taught anything new, but instead reminded of things already known. Socrates deduces this from the argument that “our souls exist in the other world” (135)
Point 2- Theory of Forms: The Theory of Forms helps us to try and understand what Socrates is trying to convey about living previous lives by using the evidence of without ever looking at a perfect circle or even a straight line one already knows what there are

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    One argument Socrates uses is that snow always brings cold, as fire always brings hot. Fire will not bring cold and snow will not bring hot. He uses these opposites to say that soul brings life with it; therefore the soul will never bring death, the opposite of life. Anything that doesn't fall to death is indestructible. The soul must be indestructible. I agree with Socrates that the soul lives on. It makes sense to me that the soul is indestructible with his reasoning behind it.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout Plato’s Republic, Socrates formulates an argument that is cohesive with the notion that one’s soul consists of three parts. He begins this argument by alluding to the fact that we need to determine whether or not the parts of our soul are similar, or different. “The same thing will not be willing to do or undergo opposites in the same part of itself, in relation to the same thing, at the same time,” this statement is an effective premise in his argument due to its unified applicability within the confines of ones soul. If ones…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He reiterates his point that something cannot accept its characteristic’s opposite by stating that, “…not only opposites will receive opposites, but also that nothing which brings the opposite will admit the opposite of that which it brings, in that to which it is brought” (Plato 3). He says that one of the characteristics that the soul possesses is life, which is the opposite of death, so, “…the soul, as has been acknowledged, will never receive the opposite of what she brings” (Plato 3). Socrates explains that the soul can never admit death because it possesses a quality that is death’s opposite. When death approaches the soul, according to his previous arguments, it would either retire or perish; however, “…the soul when attacked by death cannot perish” (Plato 4) because the soul cannot admit death. He believes that when death comes to a man, his body dies, but his soul is preserved (Plato 5). Socrates proves that the soul will not admit death and when it is approached by death, it will not perish, but retire to another…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nevertheless; as Socrates come to reply to Crito’s arguments, several aspects that wasn’t considered seem to uncover, as will be shown in the following analysis of Socrates’…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Final Paper PHL Kloke

    • 1583 Words
    • 4 Pages

    These larger questions of the soul and the mind and their existence beyond human death has been debated and explored throughout time. Yet, we lack hard evidence to support the idea of the existence of the soul and its continued ‘life’ beyond the death of the body. Individuals have not returned from the grave to transmit this knowledge in any manner that can be tested, studied, and deemed true. What a soul is and why we have it is unique to the human experience. The Abrahamic traditions defines the soul as the “I” that lives within our body and acts through it. The soul is what makes each individual unique according to theologian Thomas Aquinas. Noted philosophers Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, all argued that the psyche or, the soul, was the “crown of the logical facilities”. Yet the mind is responsible for processing our human experiences and storing them as learned experiences that shape and mold our continued existence.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I have thought quite a bit about whether or not I agree with Socrates. Part of me wants to agree with him and believe that there is a chance to come back after death. I am just unsure because even though I am not extremely religious I have always been taught that when you die you go to heaven or hell and that is where you stay for all eternity. I think that anything is possible and I honestly would not mind finding out there is an afterlife and something to come back to because in my mind it would give an actual purpose to life. Finally, if I was able to talk to Socrates and ask him a question about the afterlife I think I would ask him, “If there is an afterlife and we come back after a certain period of time, what is next? Do we live another life or do we try to make right what went wrong in our previous life?” These questions have perplexed me…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After all this, Socrates goes on to the story about a man returning from the afterlife and describing it. At the end of the story, he says that because he and his companions have established that the soul is immortal, and because this story speaks about the immortality of the soul, it is even more important for people to be just and seek good and true knowledge in their life. This, in turn, will bring them much happiness in both this life and the…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Meno's Geometric Argument

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the Meno, Socrates tries to walk Meno through the discovery of if virtue can be taught. Along the way they come across the theory that if virtue can be taught then it is knowledge. If knowledge then it can be taught but the Geometric argument was brought up where a person can have the capacity to learn based on their previous life and their soul conjuring up prior knowledge to understand the topic. Socrates called upon a slave, a person who has no formal education and walked him through a geometry problem. This problem was meant to illustrate that a person’s knowledge is not based on what this person has learned in their lifetime but their capacity and ability to understand is based on what their soul has learned in previous lifetimes. Socrates uses this example show his thesis is true but what about different scenarios that aren’t math based and through different problems you can see that Socrates theory is half correct and that there are several implications that prove that souls don’t know it all.…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates was a man of very distinct descriptions. He believed that we all would meet in a place in the afterlife. We would follow a guide down our chosen path according to the life we lived. Socrates didn’t have a fear of death or the path he would travel in the afterlife. He had a very detailed idea of how the terrain would be. He envisioned in exquisite detail of the beauty of the afterlife. He spoke of the path that people would take based on the type of person they were and the acts they committed. He is a man that doesn’t have a fear for death. He is a man that believes that there is life after death.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    However, an issue to raise with this theory is the question of what is actually is that we are remembering. We cannot know what it is we are remembering if we have no knowledge of it in the first place. ' Admittedly this assertion of the impossibility of knowing what a thing is like without knowing…

    • 1049 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    5. What are the two arguments Socrates gives to his friends for why one should not fear death? Are they convincing?…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Vs Meno Analysis

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates states that the human soul is immortal and it is reborn again, but it’s never destroyed. Socrates also points out that the soul has learned everything that is to know. Therefore, when we “learn” about something, it is merely just a “recollecting” what our soul’s have learned in the past. This idea is essentially the basis of the argument between Socrates and Meno. Socrates tries to prove this to Meno by calling over one of Meno’s servant and confirms that the boy has no knowledge of mathematics. At first, the boy seemed to have no knowledge about Socrates problem. But, through step-by-step questions, the boy was able to provide a correct answer to Socrates problem. Therefore, Socrates states that, since he had no knowledge of geometry in his life, he must have already known it and he was able to…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now having gone through all of that, Meno asks Socrates, how will know you found virtue if you do not know what it truly is? Socrates then goes on to tell Meno about the immortal soul and recollection. This is a belief that your soul is all knowing because it has been through an infinite amount of lives, consuming all kinds of knowledge and information. According to this, the soul is said to be all knowing. According to this theory, learning is just a…

    • 1014 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If learning was simply recollection, there would be no experimenting or teaching, everyone would know all they need to know without going to school and there would be no exciting advancements because we would just be at the highest level. What about the slave boy example? Well, that is disproved by the simple fact that Socrates is asking leading questions such as, “Do you know that a figure like this is a square? ”. The slave boy is not arriving at his own conclusions and is simply picking up on what Socrates is leading him to. Furthermore, this idea does not explain how we first come to know things, where is this innate knowledge coming from? All-in-all both of these ideas are deconstructed in today’s empirical world of science and experimentation, we go on journeys to discover what we do not know and ask questions along the way to help.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates responds that getting to know isn't always a count number of coming across some thing new but alternatively of recollecting something the soul knew earlier than delivery however has since forgotten. to show what he approach, he calls over one in all Meno’s slave boys, attracts a square with aspects of two feet, and asks the boy to calculate how lengthy the aspect of a rectangular would be if it had twice…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays