Preview

Deliberately Just

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2498 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Deliberately Just
Deliberately Just

What is the relation between truth and knowledge? An interconnection between truth and knowledge absolutely exist. When fact is discerned from fiction, truth is found. Judgement is salvaged through human experience; and is developed by asking questions. Inquires play a central role in learning, provide a starting point toward advanced cognition, and inquests lead to answers; revealing truth. The enlightnement human beings possess, are the foundation of belief. However, not all assumptions are just. Prejudices, superstitions, stereotypes, and delusions exist, clouding the difference between right and wrong; justice and injustice. In order for mankind to comprise a just society, people must actively rationalize all information received, afore acquiring an opinion. One way rational beliefs may be obtained, is through critical thinking. A criteria must be established to base conclusions. Convictions derived upon the five evidentiary forms abide a righteous foundation. The five evidentiary forms include One's intuition, an instinctive feeling that cannot be explained logically, Personal experience, day to day occurrences, Personal observation, a person whom actively takes note of something or someone, Official or public testimony, a spoken or written account of something that is recorded in an official or public forum, Confirmation by authority, occurs when an individual appears qualified or influential, and provides insight. These five evidentiary forms are used in everyday life, not only as an infrastructure of forming solid opinions, but in order to deduce right from wrong. These five evidentiary forms are extensively utilized In the short story The Blue Carbuncle, a mystery about a stolen jewel, and the the film Twelve Angry Men, an exploration of a diverse group of jurors whom set aside their own prejudices, and influenced one another to incur a just verdict. The stories Twelve Angry Men and The Blue Carbuncle demonstrate the idea, that one

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men - Analysis

    • 3439 Words
    • 14 Pages

    12 Angry Men (1957) is a management style and social psychological case-study of what happens when a collection of twelve jurors with diverse backgrounds after hearing testimony regarding a murder case where a teen boy of “minority” ethnicity are sequestered to a deliberation room to decide whether the teen is “guilty” or “not guilty” in the stabbing death of his father. At the heart of the deliberations is to prove that the teen is “guilty beyond a reasonable doubt” and the twelve men spar in this film for one and one-half hours in a New York City court deliberation room on a very hot, summer day. (Lumet, S. (Director). (1957). 12 Angry Men (Motion Picture). United States: MGM Studios – Video DVD)…

    • 3439 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the drama Twelve Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, there are twelve jurors to discuss and deliberate if the murder in the first degree is guilt or not. Because the verdict must be unanimous, twelve jurors have a critical thinking in their discussion and finally made the vote from eleven jurors vote for guilty to unanimous vote for not guilty. During the development of the voting, Juror Three is hardly to persuade because he has a serious prejudice to the murder. If Juror Three does not admit the murder is not guilty, they cannot settle a lawsuit. Therefore, Juror Three’s prejudice should be the key to get the final verdict.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘Twelve Angry Men’ is a drama play written by Regional Rose in 1954 which was set in a jury-room of a New York Court of Law, 1957 during a very hot summer afternoon. The jurors are asked to come up with a verdict whether the boys are guilty or not. The judge states: “You’ve listened to the testimony and you’ve had the law read to you and interpreted as it applies to this case. It now becomes your duty to separate the facts from the fancy.” Duty is something you have to do. Fancy is an idea or opinion that is not based on facts. So, in other words, the jurors have to sit down and decide what is true and what is not true. Throughout the play, Juror 8…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Twelve Angry Men” asserts that justice is far more important than truth. Do you agree? In Reginald Rose’s gripping play, “Twelve Angry Men” the assumption that justice is more important than the truth is explored. The play illustrates the necessity to eliminate all preconceived ideas when deciding a verdict based on the standard of proof, ‘beyond reasonable doubt’. Antagonists, jurors 3 and 10 find it almost impossible to administer justice fairly as they are too bound up on their own personal prejudice towards the defendant. Juror 8’s ability to dig below the surface of what seems to be a decisive case exposes flaws in the witnesses’ testimonies and other admissible evidence, ultimately…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the course of ‘Twelve Angry Men’ Rose demonstrates that reason can often overcome prejudice. The Jurors have to make an important decision…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men Plot

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plot: "Twelve Angry Men" is an interesting and exciting jury-room confrontation in which an "open and shut case" becomes strenuous as twelve strangers scuffle for answers. The trial involves a nineteen-year-old boy, who is suspect of killing his father in a late-night altercation with an extraordinary knife. His fate now lies in the hands of 12 jurors, each with his own determination to solve the case and reveal the truth. As the session takes its course, evidence becomes scrutinised, tempers rise, and the jury room erupts in a shouting brawl because one such juror finds reasonable doubts in the two testimonies that were deemed credible enough to convict. In his fight for an acquittal, the singled out juror found that the testimonial evidence was not only unreliable, but the timely fashion in which both the man and the woman alleged to have seen and heard the defendant were by far insufficient. Upon reaction to his vote, the dubious jurors immediately began questioning the man, not understanding how he could possibly think that way. Nevertheless, the adamant juror held his ground and the votes were: 11 guilty, and 1 not guilty, but the decision had to be unanimous.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    12 Angry Men: Story 2

    • 4094 Words
    • 17 Pages

    In the movie 12 Angry Men, (1957), twelve white men from different socioeconomic backgrounds with diverse personal prejudices, beliefs and personalities are brought together in a small jury room on a hot summer day. The jurors are forced to debate evidence presented in a case and carry out the task of deliberating on the guilt or innocence of a teenager accused of killing his father with a switchblade. This film dramatically illustrates how a group dynamic can influence what should be its members’ fair decision-making process. The members of the jury group must come to a unanimous and just verdict. After the group adjourns into the jury room to deliberate, a vote is taken. At this point the other group members find out that one juror, played by Henry Fonda, (Juror 8) thinks that the accused teenager is not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. As a result, conflicts arise as each juror’s unique understanding of the case along with his biases and stereotypes are revealed.…

    • 4094 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men is a movie about a young boy on trial for murdering his father. If the boy is found guilty, he will be sentenced to death. The jury men are very aware of this fact, most are perfectly fine with sending this boy to die as one man searches for the empathy of his jury peers. One by one the jury begins to sway toward the not guilty plea, as every fact thrown into conversation gets disproved. Now, one lone juror faces not the pressure of his peers but the pressure of his emotional attachment to the case to see that the boy be punished. This finally leads to Juror #3’s inevitable surrender of not guilty.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Critical to the understanding of how evidence is presented at trial is understanding how evidence is defined. Knowledge of the rules governing evidence is also essential. This paper introduces several basic but key terms, with particular emphasis on the Federal Rules of Evidence. These definitions should in nowise be construed as complete or authoritative as it is intended to introduce the basic concept as it relates to criminal justice practices.…

    • 3539 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The play and subsequent movie “Twelve Angry Men” is an examination of the dynamics at play in a jury room in the 50’s in The United States. The action revolves around the opinions, perceptions, reason and logic of twelve diverse characters that are tasked with pronouncing the guilt or innocence of a young man accused of patricide. The extraordinary element is that their finding will determine his life or death. This play was made into a movie in 1957, produced by Henry Fonda who played the lead role and Reginald Rose who wrote the original screenplay. This essay will explore some of the elements of Critical thinking found within the context of this remarkable movie, and will show that rational reason and logic when used effectively can overcome the mostly ineffective rush to judgement that can be prevalent in a population. Those elements will include:…

    • 1752 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the movie “12 Angry Men”, a 1957 black & white classic courtroom drama, the director Sidney Lumen not only gives an insight into the human susceptibility to the opinions of others and disposition to become biased due to personal prejudice but also gives a testimony to what determines a true leader. The movie tells a story of a jury composed of twelve members, who deliberate the guilt or acquittal of an 18-year old boy accused of stabbing his father to death. The stake is very high, as according to the law once the captive is pronounced guilty in an unanimous verdict, death sentence is mandatory.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 2106 Words
    • 6 Pages

    12 Angry Men is the captivating story of 12 jurors trying to solve a case of murder. All with different personalities, fights break out and disagreements occur. However in the end, a lesson is learnt for everyone. When the story begins, all the jurors are eager to convict the defendant, a young minority, on charges of murdering his father. Juror 8 is the lone dissenter. The jury’s deliberations go through a surprizing shift and one by one, the other 11 jurors feel compelled to re-examine their original decision through the lens of their own character and the background of their own lives. The film demonstrates various aspects of group dynamics, groupthink, conflict resolution, negotiation, power, social perception, communication and coaliances, all of which will be discussed further.…

    • 2106 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Twelve Angry Men, a young man is on trial for stabbing and killing his father. The…

    • 1238 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    KNOWLEDGE, our most precious asset, is the psychological result of perception and learning and reasoning. Knowledge in short is knowledge about reality; its base is perception and method reason. Hence, reason plays a key role being the method. It is an analytic tool for understanding what we perceive and thus contributing to our knowledge. The issue of correct and coherent reasoning is important because it is a way of finding the truth. Reasoning in true sense is guided on the basis of logic. Logic in fact is a system of reasoning. In order to reason out about things, we apply logical thinking to it. Logic is defined as a way of thinking or explaining something on the terms of validity. Logic therefore deals with only the validity of reason and not the truth. It provides the anatomy (analysis) of thought. However, the reasoning of thought is more affected by emotions which are strongly governed by culture and individual beliefs. As defined by Albert Hubbard,…

    • 1088 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men - 12

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men is a very interesting film. As the evidence is brought up to question by the jurors themselves. The complexity of this case grew as the films went on. Then came the hard part, making the decision, guilty or not guilty. Especially when you have jurors that are over shadowed by prejudice that influence their decision. It is only when prejudice is set aside that the jurors’ are able to make a more logical decision on the case. As the movie continues, all twelve jurors slowly arrive in the room. They take a seat according to their jury numbers and begin to discuss the case. The foreman then reviews the case. You learn that the man is accused of killing his father and all jurors must vote guilty or not guilty for there to be a verdict. As the movie continues, all twelve jurors slowly arrive in the room. They take a seat according to their jury numbers and begin to discuss the case. The foreman then reviews the case. You learn that the man is accused of killing his father and all jurors must vote guilty or not guilty for there to be a verdict.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays