During the 1500’s there was a debate if the government should be Absolutism, or Democracy. There both really good ways to live but Democracy had a better limit. Democracy gave the people and the government freedom of speech, it limited the power of the government, and it protected them. Absolutism had a absolute monarch running the country.
Democracy gave the people freedom of speech. Everyone deserves to speak their mind. Voltaire said “I may disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it”. Voltaire believed that the people should have the right to speak when they feel like they need to say something, not when others say they can, or when they do speak they get punished for not saying the right thing. Everyone deserves to be able to speak there mind and be protected when they do. Having Democracy rule would limit the power of the government, so “there can be no liberty where executive, legislative, & judicial powers are united in one person or body of persons, because such concentration is bound to result in arbitrary despotism” said Montesquieu. Limiting the power of government was better for the people because the people had more rights to the government its self. Democracy made a government that is strong and ready to protect the people’s natural rights. “To protect natural rights governments are established” (doc.5). The government has power to make laws, protect the rights and give people there freedom. Sometime the government has the right to take away our natural rights or make new laws. The government would have to be careful for whom they give power to; if they give power to an Absolute Monarch he can take complete control over our whole government. Democracy was a better government than absolutism, because having absolutism got you nowhere. “Men have less hesitation in offending a man who is loved than one who is feared, for love is held by a bond of obligation which, as men are wicked, is broken whenever personal advantage suggests it” (doc.1). Having a government of Absolutism is the same as have an Absolute Monarch run the country.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
“Democracy is a means for the people to choose their leaders and to hold their leaders accountable for their policies and their conduct in office. The people decide who will represent them in…
- 1152 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Absolutism created a time of prosperity throughout the 1500s and the 1600s. At this point of history, absolutism was an efficient way of running a government. Absolutist leaders were vigorous, assertive and a potent symbol of authority. The amount of industrial growth in countries such as Russia was both efficient and effective because the power of authority was concentrated into one person’s hands. Absolutism enabled Peter the Great to modernize and adapt Russia for war, commerce and industrial growth. Additionally, absolutism gave people a powerful leader they needed to trust in and depend on for their country's sake. This type of regnant is most evident King James I of England and King Louis XIV of France. For example, King James…
- 257 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In a democracy peoples thoughts were heard and used in a government. This government was significant, because it didn't put to much rule in the government. King Louis believed that the peoples interest and the state came first and believed in a democracy.(doc3) Voltaire also recommends a democracy and thought that freedom of speech was essential.(doc4) Voltaire was one of the most famous philosophies thinkers who defended all freedoms of people especially freedom of speech. Even when he offended government and the Catholic Church and his books were burned he still stuck up for freedom of speech and he said "I do not agree with a word that you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it", he…
- 693 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
During 17th and 18th centuries, there has been two types of government; absolutism, which gave unlimited power to the monarchs, and democracy, which gave power to the people. However, in my opinion, absolutism was still the most effective form of government during this period. There were numerous absolute monarchs such as King James I, Machiavelli and King Louis XIV renowned for their cruel use of power as a monarch. People in this time were not as educated as people in the modern society today and it was easy for them to just follow the words of the absolute monarch. On the other hand, in the 19th and 20th century, I assume than ideas of democracy surely surpassed the ideas of absolutism, due to the ideas of the enlightenment thinkers, as known as philosophes.…
- 429 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
According to The Prince, by Machiavelli, who was from the Italian City-States during the rule of the Medici, portrayed that absolutism worked best when the ruler ruled through fear and not love. This was effective because “…fear is accompanied by the dread of punishment, which never relaxes.” This quote shows that people are scared of being punishment for wrong doing, and will be think twice before disobeying or disrespecting the Prince in any way. (Doc.1) Two Treatises on Government, by John Locke, who was in favor of democracy, stated in his work that the best types of government had a limitation of paper and that the citizens agreed with their thoughts.…
- 279 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Absolutism was very prominent in Europe during the 16th century. Absolutism is a basic historical term meaning monarchial power that is unaffected by other bodies of power. This can include churches, legislatures, or social elites. This was brought up from the assumption of power. This also brings in the term of the belief of the "Divine Right". This power was very strong and meant that a certain person was chosen by God to be a King, Queen, or any position in high power. Both Eastern and Western Europe were very similar and contrasted in the way they used absolutism. In the body paragraphs below, it will be explained why they are similar and differ.…
- 441 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Which form of government was most effective during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries? Absolutism or Democracy?…
- 924 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
John Locke responds to the charge , “democracy will do nothing but invite rebellion after rebellion”. By stating the use of democracy will help the people and not cause them problems. Democracy will make life for the people easier and eliminate rebellion.…
- 1166 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Democracy is a government where the people rule and have rights, whereas absolutism is a government with one ruler and the people have limited rights. Absolutism was the most effective form of government from the 1500s to the 1800s because society needed guidance and monarchs had the power to do what was fit for their country. This particular period was a time of change not only in the government but in the areas of science, art, technology, and religion as well. Since there was so much change in society, there needed to be an effective form of government to guide the people. Absolutism, therefore, was the most effective form of government for the people from the 1500s to the 1800s.…
- 465 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
What would happen if you got two different governments going head to head, fighting to see who is better? What if those two governments were Democracy and Absolutism? In the Seventeenth and Eighteenth centuries, they were both used, and one was more effective; But which one? In this time period, Absolutism was the best form of government, because it was effective and worked for the people.…
- 426 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The most effective form of government according to Machiavelli, the prince in 1513, is absolutism. Machiavelli believed that absolutism was the most effective form of government because a democracy would have all men controlling. Machiavelli sates in document 1 that “Men are ungrateful, fickle, and deceitful, eager to avoid dangers and avid for gain, and while you are useful to them they are all with you, but as soon as danger approaches, they turn on you.” Machiavelli is saying that most men are afraid and with fear you forget your responsibilities, and since most men were afraid of the consequences of voting they would theoretically run away. Machiavelli…
- 886 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Democracy is when the people vote for who’s in charge. A man doesn’t vote to get their properties of privileges taken away, so they put their trust in the new government system that’s supposed to make the power of men more equal. If a person in power were to take over someone’s free will said person probably wouldn’t want to listen or follow that person. A ruler wants their people to like and respect them, not dislike them and wish them out of power, this causes the ruler to try to please every party.…
- 417 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Democracy was the more effective form of government for the 17th and 18th centuries in Europe. With absolutism, a colony can refuse to obey any laws or commands once things are not going according to plan into making their nation powerful. A ruler can abuse their power, and start becoming selfish or injusticely in order to keep having more power. There is a possibility for an absolute monarch succeeding into increasing and strengthening the power of their empire. However it is also likely for a ruler to a mistake after another, making the empire taking matters into their own hands.…
- 100 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
In a democracy, the people hold political power. The system lets people choose their leaders through a competitive process and hold them liable for their policies and actions in public…
- 433 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In the words of Louis XIV, “L’etat C’est Moi” (the state is me), in other words “I am the State”. (___) Absolutism is when a person claims a right to be the leader based on their birth right or gain it by force of power, they use this divine authority from God to justify their position, since this in one of the oldest forms of government. However, a democracy seems more in line with fair practice due to the fact that there were no rulers or judges in the Bible until the people asked God for them. (1 Samuel 8)…
- 1603 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays