Preview

Democratic Republicans and Federalists' Interpretation of the Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
798 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Democratic Republicans and Federalists' Interpretation of the Constitution
Throughout the period of 1801-1817 there were a couple ways the two parties of Democratic Republican and Federalists extended both strict and loose characterizations of the constitution, that shows the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison were not as much of a stereotype. The Democratic Republicans had many ways of being strict through the constitution and a couple ways of being loose. Along with the Democratic Republicans the Federalists were more strict than loose when it came to the constitution and together both the Democratic Republicans and Federalists shows hoe Jefferson and Madison were not much of a stereotype of other presidents.

To begin, the first document was from Jefferson to Gideon Granger in 1800. Jefferson explains that the states should not be granted the given powers to the Federal government in the constitution and that states should govern themselves. Jefferson wrote this document because he believed that the Federal governments power should be limited. This showed a strict interpretation of the Democratic Republicans interpretation of the constitution because Jefferson's opinion of how much power the Federal government had was very strict. The next document, Jefferson wrote to Samuel Miller in 1808 showing his support for religious freedom and how the Federal government should not be able to tell the people which religion to be a part of. This was an example of the strict Democratic Republicans interpretation of the constitution because Jefferson again was strict on what decisions the Federal government can make and what they can't make the people do. The message Madison wrote to congress to veto an Internal Improvement Bill in 1817 which explains how Madison is against the internal improvements. His veto of the bill supports a strict interpretation of the constitution since Madison was strict on how he was against the bill. These documents showed how the Democratic Republicans were strict with the interpretation of the constitution.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thesis: The political and economic views of Hamiltonian Federalists and Jeffersonian Republicans differed in terms of centralized or state governments, acts passed by congress, American liberty, and industries. Later on when the Republican party dominated the government after the War of 1812, their original ideals started to blend in with Federalists’ and the lines blurred.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    By both definition and widespread perception the Jeffersonian-Republicans were strict constructionists, meaning they closely followed the framework of the Constitution. On the other hand, the belief was that Federalists, who thought the Constitution was open for interpretation, were loose constructionists. Although both the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison (Democratic-Republicans) mainly supported these theories, they, like other politicians of the time, often made exceptions to their “policies.”…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The perception that Federalists were loose constructionists and that Jeffersonian Republicans were very strict constructionists was very well founded, but not accurate 100% of the time. The presidency of Thomas Jefferson mainly supported the theory that the Jeffersonian Republicans were strict constructionists. James Madison's presidency supported that theory as well. Both presidents, however, made exceptions to their general policies when an issue was just too big to fit inside the tiny box of their shared school of thought.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Jeffersonian Republican presidents Jefferson and Madison often reflected the beliefs of the Federalist Hamilton by not standing firm with their beliefs and contradicting their own words. Even though Hamilton’s reasoning wasn’t the happiest or the easiest he was truthful. Jefferson seemed like all he really did was talk without actually putting thought into what he was…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jeffersonian Republicans were often portrayed as strict constructionalists and the Federalists were considered broad constructionalists, but this characterization was untrue in many ways. Between 1801 and 1817 their primary beliefs on economics, military, and the judicial branch seemed to change completely.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During Jefferson’s presidency, he implemented an embargo that required a strong central government to enforce.(Doc F) As a result of the embargo, manufacturing grew more rapidly under Jefferson than that of the federalist leader. With the band of trade, America became dependent on nation made products which helped grow the manufacturing industry drastically. By 1812, John Adams began to approve of the two Republican presidents’ restoration of the taxes and the Navy.(Doc G) Jefferson had restored taxes while he held office, while Madison worked on building back up the Navy. Even though the Founding Fathers were both finding a moderate ground, others were not adjusting. During both presidencies, the tariffs kept and enforced were disliked by some Republicans. Southern Democratic-Republican farmers rejected the protective tariff created by Madison because it lead to higher prices.(Doc H) These tariffs were set by Hamilton, and enhanced by Republican…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1801 and 1817, the two parties the Jeffersonian Republicans and Federalists seemed to have changed their views on the issue of whether the constitution should be loosely interpreted, or strictly interpreted. The Democratic-Republicans originally prided themselves in having strict constructionist beliefs, but however, as time went on, they seemed to have adopted a broader outlook. The Federalists, who favored a looser perspective on the interpretation of the construction, adopted a more strict interpretation. Whenever the members of these parties had to change their perspective in order to suit their needs, they seemed to have no qualms in doing so.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ 2

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During the period of 1801-1817, Democratic-Republicans and Federalists had different views of the Constitution; strict interpretation and then loose interpretation. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison were two Democratic-Republican presidents who viewed the Constitution strictly. However, Jefferson would sometimes adopt federalist practices and loosely interpret the Constitution. The federalists during the Hartford Convention viewed the Constitution super strictly; especially many objectives of the War of 1812 were unconstitutional. Throughout 1801-1817, Jefferson had both strict and loose interpretations of the Constitution, as did federalists.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first three Republican presidents, Thomas Jefferson (1801–09), James Madison (1809–17), and James Monroe (1817–25) were all wealthy, aristocratic southern planters; all three shared the same liberal political philosophy (Brown, 2012). When Thomas Jefferson assumed the presidency in 1800 he “established close ties with both houses of congress”. Jefferson was careful to only nominate individuals who support his programs in an effort to limit in fighting. Jefferson practice political moderation, not removing all Federalist from the government post but instead hoping to convert some to the Republican Party (Divine et al., 2013).…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the 1800's, Jeffersonian Republicans thought that the federal government’s power was confined to the grants of the Constitution. On the other hand, the Federalists believed in the broad construction that gave the government any power that was not forbidden by the constitution. Despite the fact that the Jeffersonian Republicans believe in a strict interpretation of the Constitution, and Federalists believe in a loose interpretation, these beliefs were misrepresented according to the party’s views on the authority of the government during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison. During this time, the Jeffersonian Republicans beliefs were inverted with the beliefs of the Federalists. The Jeffersonian Republicans leaned toward a loose interpretation and the Federalists leaned toward a strict one.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two main political parties in early America, the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans, fought many ideological and political battles from 1790 to 1810. Conflicts between these two parties grew out of their opposing ideologies the Democratic-Republicans supported states rights and a strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, whereas the Federalists favored a strong central government and a broader interpretation of the Constitution. However there are more than 3 major topics that I could talk about involving the Federalist and Democratic-Republicans between the years 1789 and 1812. Some of the topics are boring and some of the topics are pretty interesting.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787 when the Constitution was created it caused many people to start a grand debate. Of course, there were people that supported the constitution and people that were afraid of the constitution. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists created documents that are within the Constitution that have shaped United States political parties. The Federalists supported a strong central government because the Articles of Confederation didn’t have strong national power, and was very restrictive.A reason why The Federalist wanted to change the constitution was to add people’s opinion into the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists supported a strong state government because they believed that a strong national government would cause a monarch and they were afraid of who will have the power.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "There is nothing I dread so much as a division of the Republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader and converting measures in opposition to each other. This...is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution."1 This view, expressed by John Adams, was not shared by all, namely Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. As the early American government began to form, so did the two major political parties. Alexander Hamilton was the founder of the Federalist Party, while Thomas Jefferson led the Anti-Federalists in response.2 Both men used their prominence in each party to their advantage to influence the public and their disputes created controversy and discordance between the parties and the American people. Hamilton and Jefferson had many disagreements throughout their careers and had radically different opinions on what their new country should be like.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The different biased policies of which Federalists believed in interpreting the Constitution broadly, while Jeffersonian Republicans (Anti-Feds) believed it should be interpreted strictly, continued through the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. However, throughout both of their terms, both parties eventually “switched” their ideals, and followed the other party’s belief. “Our country is too large to have all its affairs directed by a singled government” (Doc. A) is a letter from Jefferson to Granger, then the complete opposite is written in Doc F, where Randolph talks about how the J. Republicans abandon their original principles. This is just one example of how later the two parties ideals were “switched.” Actions such as the Louisiana Purchase, the Embargo Act, and the establishment of the Second National Bank show this.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By 1817 the great American experiment was in full swing. America was developing into an effective democratic nation. However as the democracy continued to grow, two opposing political parties developed, the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. The Jeffersonian Republicans believed in strong state governments, a weak central government, and a strict interpretation of the Constitution. The Federalists saw it differently. They opted for a powerful central government with weaker state governments, and a loose interpretation of the Constitution. The seemingly solid divide between Federalist and Republican would begin to blur during the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. For, neither Republican president was able lead the nation with purely republican ideals.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays