In the first process of the lab, you measure the mass of water transferred from a buret to a beaker, to determine the experimental mass of the water, and the volume of the water collected. We measured the temperature of the water so we could calculate the density of the water, which enabled us to calculate the actual volume of water, by using the density and the measured volume of water. To determine the percent error, we had to subtract the actual volume of water by the experimental volume of water transferred from the buret to the beaker, and then divided it by the actual volume and multiplied it by 100. In the second process, you perform the same steps you did for the buret, but instead, you use a 5.00mL or 10.00mL pipet. You repeated each…
The goal of this lab is to find out which metals were used in the minting of pennies before and after 1982 by calculating their densities.…
In this experiment, the experimenters found the density of solid objects and then the concentrations of solutions based on their densities. It was determined that as density increases, concentration does as well. The density of a substance is something that stays constant, for solutions of material the density is expected to increase in direct translation to the concentration increasing. The theory surrounding this lab was to see in practice how density could be determined with displacement and then to determine whether the density does in fact increase directly with the concentration.…
that the left tank was out of fuel. Quickly, the pilots decided that getting to…
* The calculated volume is more accurate than the Archimedes’ Principle because it may have a higher percentage of error.…
Experiment M1 was designed to familiarize us with how to take measurements with motion sensors, inferring graph such as time vs velocity and time vs position, and differentiating random and systematic error in an experiment. During activity 1 we begun by standing in front of motion sensor at a distance of 1.2 meters and varied our distance by 0.6 meters over the course of 25 seconds. This activity presented us with a position vs time graph that we were supposed to replicate to our best ability. For activity 2 we are given a position vs time to replicate and after replication a velocity vs time graph is created below. The graph showed that, though the position raises, evens out, and then returns to initial position; the velocity spiked positively, dropped negatively, and then evened out. During activity 3 we discussed the terms average value, random errors, systematic errors, accuracy, precision, and standard deviation. Using the equations provided in the text, we are able to calculate the average value and the standard deviation using the average value of both trails. After both calculations on each trial we were able to come to the conclusion that, increasing the range of results ultimately increased the standard deviation and random errors. The increase in standard deviation and random error lowered the accuracy of the trial. Theoretically, by closing our eyes in trial two there should have be an increase in standard deviation, random error, and a lower accuracy; in our results however, the second trial had a .000044 lower standard…
One error in our data was that the measurements we gathered for one of our sets were rather high. Even after re-doing the entire procedure for the set, our measurements were still off. Looking back, we didn’t dry off the graduated cylinder each time before re-filling it with water, which could have thrown off our volumes and therefore our densities. Since we combined all of our data as a class, we were able compensate for these errors. One method that could be improved to ensure more accurate and precise data is to have everyone use the same balance to get the masses of the pennies.…
Determine density of a product for a plastic manufacturing facility. Provide quality control by making sure the physical properties are within design specifications. Density is defined as the ratio of an object’s mass to its volume, measured by dividing mass by volume (density = mass/volume). This was accomplished using two different experimental methods, displacement and floatation. The theory is that both methods should have the same density results; the goal is to determine which method is “best”.…
After reading the lab instructions - but before starting the lab - record your best “educated guess” about each experiment: Experiment 1: Which method of finding the density give you the least percent error and why? Experiment 2: After completing the first experiment, answer this question. Which block do you think has the highest density and why?…
Some errors we faced were water being displaced when pouring the metals into the test tubes (could have changed volume). Also, we should have given the scale more time to get and exact answer rather than writing down one of the first numbers we saw. Now, there are ways we can certainly improve this experiment. One would be to take more time to get and exact volume rather than generalizing based on previous data (30.0 exactly for all initial volumes of water). We realized that this could have thrown off our calculations for final density and thus our identification. The analytical balance should be used in…
Density is defined as mass per unit volume, which can be used to determine the object or…
The way that the northerners reacted to the fugitive slave act was that they thought they could no longer ignore the fact that by supporting the fugitive slave act and played an important role in supporting slavery.…
In this lab we studied the densities of four different metals using a caliper, a digital scale, and a calculator. Three metals were pure elements like copper, iron, and aluminum. The fourth metal was an alloy which was brass. The purposes of this lab were to demonstrate that different metal elements have different densities, and that alloys have densities somewhere between those elements that compose them. We also calculated the percent errors between the actual densities and the expected densities. The actual density of aluminum was 2.76g/cc with the percent error being 2.67%. The actual density of iron was 7.88g/cc with the percent error being 0.25%. The actual density of copper was 9.07g/cc with the percent error being 1.2%. The actual density of brass was 8.61g/cc with the percent error being 1.9%.…
The hypothesis for the Oil Absorbency Lab was rejected. My hypothesis was that if a person puts a sponge in materials “crude oil”, then it will absorb the most amount of oil. The data collected from this experiment rejected the hypothesis because it stated that the sponge would absorb the most oil, but the sponge did not absorb more oil than the rag. The rag and sponge’s ranges were for the first trial was 53.0g, the second trial was 51.0g, and the third trial was 46.0g and the rag. The rag and sponge’s averaged ranged scores were 51.0g, I believe this happened because the rag has more space than the sponge to hold the oil. An outside factor that may have caused this outcome could have been the amount of pressure placed on the material…
In this Lab activity we saw the differences between the density of solids and the density of liquids.…