Preview

Descartes 4th Meditation

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
788 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Descartes 4th Meditation
After Descartes goes over what he has previously covered, including his proving that God exists and that God is perfect, he begins his fourth meditation. In this meditation, titled Truth and falsity, Descartes contemplates how he, Descartes makes mistakes if he is a product of this perfect being. First, he knows that God would not deceive him, since the will to deceive is a sign of weakness or hatred, and God's perfection would not allow it. Second, if God created him, God is responsible for his judgment, and so his sense of judgment must be flawless as long as he uses it correctly. The question at hand is, why does Descartes make mistakes if he is the product of God, who is a perfect being. In Descartes fourth meditation he gives some plausible reasons on why we are not perfect beings like our creator. One thought that Descartes gives is free will. Descartes explains that our will tends to come into play before we think things over. Due to this fact, we often pass judgment on things before we clearly know the right answer and also because of indifference. Along with free will comes the problem of arrogance. Free will allows us to make our own choices; therefore we think that we know best. Usually the choices we make only benefit ourselves because we are altruistic beings. This in itself makes us imperfect beings. God does not only think about Himself, if that was the case, there would not even be a population. By thinking only about ourselves, we are pulling ourselves further away from the perfection of our Creator by making ourselves less like him.

Furthermore, the next question that arises is, does God even exist? During Descartes first meditation, titled What can be called into doubt, he discusses the Dream Argument. In the Dream Argument Descartes explains that he can doubt what he sees. Therefore, if we can not see God, how can we prove His existence? This proposition beings skepticism in to play. Skepticism is the thesis that knowledge is not



Cited: 1. Feinberg, Joel, and Shafer-Laundau, Russ. Reason and Responsibility. 12th. Belmont, CA, USA: Thomson and Wadsworth, 2005.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phil 101 Questions

    • 4817 Words
    • 15 Pages

    1. Why is it important to Descartes to determine as early as possible whether God exists and is a deceiver?…

    • 4817 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This gives an insight into why Descartes relies so heavily on the God in his meditations. It seems he uses God to support his meditations and uses God as a solution to his philosophy of doubt. God is vital as he is the answer to Descartes’ most complex ideas on doubt and enables him to preach God’s ability to relieve us of doubt but further more he want to reveal to us that God is the reason for all matter , for our…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The essence of the main argument in the fourth Meditation of Descartes is to establish that there is a difference between God: his creator and himself, and how this difference does not taint the infinite abilities of God. Descartes commences his argument by first establishing his idea of being a thinking being. In his previous book, The Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy he sates,…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cartesian Dualism Flaws

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To begin with, Descartes asserts that because (P1) “I know that everything which I clearly and distinctly understand is capable of being created by God so as to correspond exactly with my understanding of it” (p. 16), and…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes sets out on a mission to guarantee that every one of his beliefs is certain without any doubt. He considers that he should free himself of all false learning keeping in mind the end goal is to acquire any genuine information. Descartes chooses to question all that he has learned from truth in the past. He will depend on his thinking capacity to reconstruct his own particular knowledge, starting with a foundation of things which he is most sure about. Descartes declines to acknowledge anything that has any hint of doubt. His purpose behind doing such is because he genuinely trusts this is the best way to find the practical presence of something that cannot be questioned. Descartes uses a strategy in his endeavor to obtain information.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hum 112

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rene Descartes in his Discourse of the Method begins with the problem of showing and proving his own existence, but later in the reading changes the problem and it is concentrating on proving the existence of God. The first time that I thought to myself that this reading is probably about something else than proving his own existence was where the author started talking about perfection. The author defined God as “something that truly was more perfect than I was, something indeed having perfections of which I could have any idea” (Descartes, 2010, p.16).…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes v Hume

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Meditation I, Descartes reflects on his past beliefs and realizes how so much that he once believed to be true was actually false. To separate what is truth from fiction; Descartes decided to completely reject anything which he can doubt at all. He wrote, “If I am able to find in each some reason to doubt, this will suffice to justify my rejecting the whole” (Descartes 4). The belief that inspired this method was that genuine truth was clear and distinct and that any doubt whatsoever could not provide absolute certainty. In essence, if any component of something was in the very least questionable, then any conclusion drawn from it would be at the most questionable. This method led Descartes to doubt practically everything he once believed, especially knowledge attained through the senses. He wrote, “All that up to the present time I have accepted as most true and…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this sense, God is perfect, and would never allow deception and error to take place because they are imperfect and God consists only of perfect qualities. God would not allow one to be deceived because he is supremely good, therefore deception and error must be a result of another source. He says that if his origin is from something other than God, he could have easily created him so that he makes mistakes and until he finds his origin doubt is going to occue. Descartes supposes that God is just a tale so he says let us just fraction him out of the equation entirely. Descartes decides that he is just going to doubt everything based on two principles. The first being that everything should be doubted at some point by those who seek the truth and the second being that things that are considered doubtful should be treated as if they are false. With that in mind he concludes that he does exist even against all doubts because the Evil Genius can never say that Descartes is non-existent because he thinks he is something therefore he must be. I think, therefore I…

    • 3392 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He then makes a claim that states effects aren’t ever realer than their causes, which means something ‘perfect’ must exist to be able to have the idea of ‘perfection’. Descartes goes on to say that he knows he isn’t ‘perfect’ and since he isn’t ‘perfect’, who could have put this idea in his head? His answer is something ‘perfect’, and that something ‘perfect’ must be…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    God is the next doubt that Descartes brings to attention. He says that he is constantly deceived and God must have created him to be subject to this occasional deception. This doubt is quickly dispersed however when Descartes reasons that God is good and therefore would not deceive him because that would be contrary to his goodness.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    From the beginning of the third meditation, Descartes seeks to establish the existence of God using his initial concept of self awareness. Descartes argued that because he thought, then he lived. Thinking ability at this time was linked to being alive and thought that there must be a god who puts the thoughts in his mind. In his quest for indubitable truth, Descartes came up with the theory of ideas, which classified those things that he considered distinct and clear to be true. Descartes argued that the idea of god should be coming from within him since he cannot experience god himself directly or find any perfection in himself.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes is trying to find where his thoughts of God are coming from. He knows they couldn’t come from himself because for one he doubts, he has desires and he lacks stuff. Now, he is calling into question whether they are from his parents, but there is a problem with that interpretation too because, then the question of where his parents got it from would be arise and it would be going back like a chain all the way to his ancestors or who knows. Considering the fact that he is a thinking thing, he also argue that the thought of God cannot be…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes also states that this argument isn’t strong enough to prove that God exists. Because he has been constantly revising his believes he says that at this point he can easily tell the difference between essence and existence. After he points that out he explains that he believes that God could be separated from the existence but not from his essence. Then he contradicts himself saying that not existing would be prove of him not being perfect thus he had to exist. After that Descartes starts lacking of confidence that God exists. He thinks that he is giving some attributions, being perfect; to a creature that he doesn’t even know if exists. He thinks that he is just matching two things that he knows to make something new, something that…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He starts with the idea of a God who is eternal, infinite, and perfect. In the beginning of Meditations on First Philosophy, He explains that “we must believe that there is a God, because we are so taught in the Holy Scriptures, and, on the other hand, that we must believe the Holy Scriptures because they come from God “(Descartes 1). He then doubts himself if god does really exist. Through examining his thoughts, he ends up believing that the idea of God exists because of his innate idea of God which has to be God who “is the cause of this idea”(Descartes 25). Descartes then explains more in depth saying, “I have no choice but to conclude that the mere fact of my existing is and of there being in me an idea of a most perfect being, that is God, demonstrates most evidently that God too exists” (34). Another reason is how in his further mediations, he explains how if God does not exist, then he is not a supremely perfect being. Saying that God does not exist, we can imagine a being that is more perfect than God. But this is a contradiction because since the idea of God is the idea of the most perfect being of all. Therefore, God must exist because you cannot image a more perfect being than god, who he is the almighty and perfect of…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Philosophy Exam 2

    • 1455 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Earnestly, Descartes ponders over the course of Meditation IV how an all-powerful and seemingly benevolent God could allow man to believe errors and falsehoods. In Meditation IV, Descartes compared God to a master craftsman, so wouldn’t it seem that his craft would be without mistake. Undoubtedly, Descartes is befuddled by the concept of sometimes believing in falsehoods although he was created by an infinitely perfect being, isn’t believing in falsehoods supposed to be a bad thing? If that is the case then who is to blame? However, Descartes perceives that it would be impossible for God to deceive him and would neither desire too because God is simply perfect in all ways. God had given a faculty that would not lead man to error as long as it was used correctly, thus it is the fault of man for believing in falsehoods. In my notes, the understanding is summarized as when one chooses to believe a claim that does not have sufficient evidence then one is to blame for rushing to judgment. In a perfect world, it would seem that man should never fall to error because of the faculty given by God, but continuously we give rise to an infinitude of imperfections. Descartes further presses on to understand why God allows falsehoods or flaws innately within man that lead to error; he attributes it to two things: faculty of understanding and faculty of free will. Because we can choose to question, seek answers, believe in what we want to believe, that is the reason for error. Descartes says that he does not question the mysterious ways of God, although he does seem to ponder his actions for these faculties alone testify to the tenacious and insatiable curiosity of man. At the end of Meditation IV, Descartes comes into an understanding about his perceptions since he had discovered the source of falsity and error that for as long as he is diligent of will and restraint within the bounds of his own knowledge, he will never be deceived. I do…

    • 1455 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays