Descartes Cogito Argument

Descartes has three main arguments in his skeptic strategy; dream, deceiving God and the evil Genius. All these three arguments hold that we do not directly see external objects but rather through what our minds tell us which are the images formed by the external objects in our minds. In his argument about dreaming Descartes says dreams are a non-pathological to madness. Descartes argues that dreams depict that even under normal mental conditions our sensory knowledge can be deceptive. Dreams lack clarity and distinctness and cannot compromise what we perceive while we are a wake. His argues the evil demon is the source of our deception. The evil demon has the ability to cheat us just as Descartes thought God could do, deceiving us from even the most unquestionable issues.
Descartes cogito argument is the famous philosophical insight, “I think, therefore I am.” Descartes was dissatisfied with the philosophy of his time which was dominated by scholastic philosophy. He considered their disputes pointless. Descartes thought the philosophy needed a new start. Descartes wanted to find certain and unshakable beliefs that he could build his new philosophy on. The method Descartes used is
This method reveals that there is a huge difference between the things we think we are certain about and the things we are justified in being certain about. For example, one may be doubtlessly certain that they washed their hands. Yet are they really justified in being so certain. Descartes argues that after having employed this method of radical doubt they will have to admit that they are not. Descartes argues that they just might be dreaming. Perhaps there is an evil demon that constantly manipulates our thoughts by systematically distracts when we try to verify our beliefs. Descartes method leaves hardly any belief