Preview

Descartes Fourth Meditation Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
603 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Descartes Fourth Meditation Analysis
In his Fourth Meditation, Descartes approaches the problem of human mistakes and ultimately reconciles this with the existence of a non-deceiving God. He takes issue with the notion of God, being perfect, creating in him an imperfection – that is, the capacity to make mistakes. Mistakes, according to Descartes, arise when we are mistaken or deceived about a truth. But God is not a deceiver; and given that God has given humans the ability to judge, it doesn’t follow that he should give us the ability to be deceived in a judgement. Descartes discovers mistakes as a fault in ourselves, and not in God – he claims that though God gave us the faculties of intellect and of will, it is our incorrect use of these that causes us to make mistakes. Error,
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Descartes Meditation 1 Summary
    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Descartes Meditation 1 Summary

    Thus, they can be called into doubt. He is aware that if something deceives you at least one time, it will again, and therefore it cannot be trusted. This is evident when he states, “I have noticed that the senses are sometimes deceptive; and it is a mark of prudence never to place our complete trust in those who have deceived us even once” (14). This statement proves that Descartes believes that his senses’ reliability can be called into question. For example, he states that our senses are not always accurate when it comes to perceiving small and distant objects, because we may mistake a fly on the wall for a smudge if we do not look at it from a close enough distance. By doing this, Descartes discredits the first claim he makes, which says that you must believe what your senses tell you. Therefore, he has discovered that he cannot rely on his senses for his intended philosophical foundation upon which he wishes to build his…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Was God Important to Descartes?
    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Why Was God Important to Descartes?

    The existence of God has an extreme influence on the majority of philosophical debate and questioning and no more so than with Descartes and his meditations. His meditations and his method of approaching philosophical questioning all derive from a rationalist ideology. Therefore he argues that all humans are thinking beings and have ideas prior to experience due to their intellectual existence and not of a sensual one. His meditations are primarily to dismiss Empiricism and to reveal that doubt is necessary to our life. Perhaps even to warn us of the dangers of our own deceitfulness and not to trust anything forced upon us by our perceptions. That is why God is so important to his meditations; as Descartes believes God is perfect and cannot be deceived and cannot fail us therefore in his trust we do not need to doubt.…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Fourth Meditation Of Descartes Analysis
    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fourth Meditation Of Descartes Analysis

    The essence of the main argument in the fourth Meditation of Descartes is to establish that there is a difference between God: his creator and himself, and how this difference does not taint the infinite abilities of God. Descartes commences his argument by first establishing his idea of being a thinking being. In his previous book, The Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy he sates,…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Sixth Meditation Argument Analysis
    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Descartes Sixth Meditation Argument Analysis

    Among Descartes’ many notable arguments, in the Sixth Meditation he makes a case for the real distinction between mind and body. This idea that mind and body are distinct was not common during Descartes’ time and conflicted directly with the popularly accepted scholastic view of the human being as a hylomorphic substance. The argument of the Sixth Meditation draws on much of Descartes’ own work concerning substance, attributes and distinction. In this paper, I will argue that he arrives at the conclusion that mind and body are in fact distinct by a categorical syllogism, focusing primarily on defending the minor premise that mind and body can be conceived as separate.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Response Paper of Meditation Four, Five, and Six
    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Response Paper of Meditation Four, Five, and Six

    Descartes talked about the true and the false, and how we make mistakes in Meditation Four. Descartes believed that error as such is not something real that depends upon God, but rather is merely a defect. And thus there is no need to account for my errors by positing a faculty given to me by God for this purpose(546). He thought that the reason why we make mistakes is that the faculty of judging the truth, which we got from God, is not infinite(546). When Descartes focused more closely on more closely on himself and inquired into the nature of his errors, he noted that errors depend on the simultaneous concurrence of two causes: intellect and will(547). He didn’t believe that God ought to have given us a greater faculty of knowing than he did(547). So we cannot make no mistakes like God. Then Descartes raised a question that can he complain that the will or free choice he have received from God is insufficiently ample or perfect(547). After using paragraphs talking about it, Descartes perceived that the power of willing is not the cause of his errors, for it is most ample as well as perfect in its kind(548). This idea is similar to Augustine’s ides in On Free Choice of the Will. Then he thought if he held off from making a judgment when he do not perceive what is true with sufficient clarity and distinctness, it is cleat that he was acting properly and not committing an error(548). In the end, he said he would indeed attain it if only he paid enough attention to all the things that he perfectly understand, and separate them off from the rest, which he apprehended more confusedly and more obscurely(549).…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Meditation Three Analysis
    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Descartes Meditation Three Analysis

    The Meditator is alone, no trees, no people, no oceans, no mountains, no earth, no moon; just him and his isolation. In “Meditation Three”, Descartes goes much deeper than just his famous philosophical ideal — if “one can think one can be”(Descartes 19). He goes on to explain how there must be a God. He states that if there was not a God, people would have created themselves. If this were to be true, everyone would create themselves as perfect people. Descartes believes that there must be a God. God created humans and other humans and other objects to allow humans to think. This human ability to think allows them to exist. If nothing else were to exist and the Meditator was alone in the universe then he could not think and without thought,…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    An Analysis of Descartes’ First Meditation
    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages

    An Analysis of Descartes’ First Meditation

    In Descartes’ First Meditation, Descartes’ overall intention is to present the idea that our perceptions and sensations are flawed and should not be trusted entirely. His purpose is to create the greatest possible doubt of our senses. To convey this thought, Descartes has three main arguments in the First Meditation: The dream argument, the deceiving God argument, and the evil demon “or evil genius”. Descartes’ dream argument argues that there is no definite transition from a dream to reality, and since dreams are so close to reality, one can never really determine whether they are dreaming or not. To reinforce that argument, Descartes presents the deceiving God argument. He says that since God is all powerful, then he has the power to deceive us about reality or our dreams. But again, Descartes feels this argument is missing something, which is why he concludes with the evil genius argument. The evil genius argument’s purpose is to tie all these arguments together and strengthen Descartes’ entire argument. The evil genius argument goes like this: God is omnipotent and supremely good, which means God cannot be the one who deceives humans, rather, a separate entity -- an "evil genius, [who is] supremely powerful and clever, who has directed his entire effort at deceiving me" (Descartes 492). By deceiving, I mean tricking humans that their sensations and perceptions are real, when they are indeed not real. To overcome this evil genius, Descartes says he will regard all external things as “hoaxes of my dreams, with which he (the evil genius) lays snares for my credulity” (Descartes 492). In this analysis, I will further discuss Descartes’ arguments in the First Meditation, the purpose of the evil genius argument, how Descartes attempts to overcome the power of this great deceiver, and ultimately why his attempt is…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Descartes Systematic Doubt In Meditations On First Philosophy
    • 3392 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Descartes Systematic Doubt In Meditations On First Philosophy

    "Give a detailed account of Descartes ' systematic doubt or methodical doubt in Meditation 1, making it certain that you distinguish between real doubts and so called hypothetical/metaphysical doubts. Then, explain in detail, exactly how Descartes dispels each and every one of these doubts during the course of the subsequent Meditations beginning with the cogito. Do you think that Descartes has been completely successful? Explain."The main goal of Descartes in Meditations on First Philosophy was to find truth behind all of his beliefs in order to build a solid foundation of certainty, and to focus his beliefs strictly on his idea of certainty; essentially to question knowledge. Descartes beliefs are mainly based on the theory that, if someone thinks that they really know something, they must be correct. Descartes meditations bring…

    • 3392 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Meditation 1 Analysis
    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Descartes Meditation 1 Analysis

    God is the next doubt that Descartes brings to attention. He says that he is constantly deceived and God must have created him to be subject to this occasional deception. This doubt is quickly dispersed however when Descartes reasons that God is good and therefore would not deceive him because that would be contrary to his goodness.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    René Descartes Meditations On First Philosophy
    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page

    René Descartes Meditations On First Philosophy

    Another philosophical reference found in the Matrix is the work of René Descartes. He is responsible for Cartesian coordinates, a system that specifies each point uniquely in a plane by a pair of numerical coordinates, and the phrase, “I think, therefore I am.” In his book Meditations on First Philosophy, he poses the question of how we can know that the world we experience daily is not an illusion being forced upon us by an evil demon. Because we believe what we see and feel when we are dreaming, how can we trust that our senses will tell us when we are no longer dreaming. If senses cannot provide us with proof that the world we live in actually exists, then senses are unreliable and that for all we know, the world might be under the control…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Descartes Meditation Iii
    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Descartes Meditation Iii

    In the "Mediations of First Philosophy" Descartes tries to prove the existence of God in the third meditation. He does this by coming up with several premises that eventually add up to a solid argument. First, I will explain why Descartes ask the question, does god exist? And why does Descartes think he needs such and argument at this point in the text. Secondly, I will explain, in detail, the arguments that Descartes makes and how he comes to the conclusion that God does exist. Next, I will debate some of Descartes premises that make his argument an unsound one, including circular reasoning. Finally, I will see if his unsound argument has diminished and undermined his principal goals and the incorrigible foundation of knowledge.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Descartes First Meditation Analysis
    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Descartes First Meditation Analysis

    Descartes argues that we often have perceptions in life that seem incredibly obvious and unquestionable, things that surely must be real. Yet at times our senses can deceive us. But why would God deceive us if he is the model of perfection? Instilling a fault from a faultless being doesn’t make sense, as doing such would go against him being as impeccable as he is, unless it isn’t god who is behind this curtain of confusion, but instead a deceiver, a cunning demon causing me to question my own judgements.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rene Descartes First Meditation Summary
    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rene Descartes First Meditation Summary

    René Descartes begins his first meditation by calling all our current beliefs to suspicion. His purpose of this practice was to stripe away all the falsehoods that we have acquired since childhood by the use of our senses. He also wanted to build anew a stable foundation of beliefs that he can be certain are of undeniably truths.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Descartes First Meditation
    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Descartes First Meditation

    Descartes’ first meditation, his main objective is to present three skeptical arguments to bring doubt upon what he considers his basic beliefs. Descartes believes this to be an intricate part of his complete epistemological argument. Descartes skeptical arguments are not intended to be a denial of his basic beliefs. On the contrary, he uses these arguments to help prove one of his main theses, which is the existence of God. One of the main premises that Descartes uses in his proof for the existence of God comes from the evil demon argument, which he proposed, in the first meditation. It is this evil demon argument, which will be the topic of the following discussion.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Descartes First Meditation
    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Descartes First Meditation

    This week we had to read Rene Descartes FIRST MEDITATION: On what can be called into doubt. I really enjoyed this reading because it made me think a lot and dig deeper into what he was writing about and try to connect it with real life. After reading Descartes outside of class we a lot about dreams, our senses, being deceived, trust and doubting out beliefs. I found this reading very interesting because almost everyone who reads it can relate to it some way or another. The topic I felt had the most connection to how people feel is having doubts about your beliefs. When you are being raised you share the same beliefs as your parents because they are raising you and instilling their beliefs in you. You believe everything your parents say and…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More