Preview

Descartes Meditations On First Philosophy Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1156 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Descartes Meditations On First Philosophy Summary
The author of Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes, is a philosopher of the 17th century. After his vision of philosophical insight, Descartes realized we have no basis for our knowledge. With his background of a Jesuit education and training in law, Descartes began to write. He begins by making his first philosophical claim: the fundamental characteristic of human beings is that we all have an equal ability to reason (Discourse on Method, 1). Through Descartes’ meditations and skepticism, he hopes people will see through his eyes. He does not want to tell his readers what to think; instead, he wants to show them how to think. Descartes hopes that just as he is successful in building a firm foundation of knowledge, others will be able …show more content…
As he becomes more and more skeptical, he begins doubting his initial beliefs regarding logic and mathematics. Unlike his arguments against dreams, two plus three always equals five and a square always has four sides, no matter what state he is in (Meditation One, 61). Descartes’ main argument of deceiver god is his worst-case scenario, in his most skeptical state. Descartes proposes a belief that there is an all knowing being who is trying to trick us. He then goes on to realize that if this is the case, we cannot even be sure if mathematics and logic are true. But if the idea of a deceiver god is accurate, then even the strongest foundation of knowledge will be proven unstable, as that foundation would be a deceiver god feeding false thoughts. Descartes finally comes to the conclusion that if there is no greater being, we are created imperfectly, which means our thinking and rationality can in no way be trustworthy or worthwhile. He chooses to believe in neither the dream argument, nor the deceiver …show more content…
He comes to the conclusion that there is only one thing we are sure of – the cogito (I think, therefore I am). Descartes claims the one thing we can be sure of is our existence. The mind, the soul, and one’s rational thinking capacity are the only things we can prove to exist. As long as a person doubts, questions, and thinks of the world around him, he is sure of is his existence (Meditation Two, 65). If the idea of a deceiver god was true, there must be someone the deceiver god is deceiving, which again, confirms our existence. Descartes chooses to make the knowledge of our existence, the cogito, a foundation of knowledge, as it is the only thing he is completely sure of. Descartes is not able to prove the existence of our bodies, of the external world, or even god. What he does prove is the existence of our ability to think

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Rene Descartes lived from 1596 to 1650. He was born in France, and went to a Jesuit primary school. He earned a law degree, but later on he began focusing on math and logic in the world. During the early 17th century, his ideas deviated more and more from previous philosophers. Because of this, he became known as “The Father of Modern Philosophy.” While some of his ideas weren’t completely original, his way of getting to them was. He believed in totally ignoring everything previous philosophers had done, and starting new, as if their work had never happened. He did not even trust his own emotions. He also believed that consciousness was the only truth in the world, leading to his most famous statement, “I think; therefore I am.” He also published several books, and despite his late entrance in the subject, and early death, he is still one of the most…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The existence of God has an extreme influence on the majority of philosophical debate and questioning and no more so than with Descartes and his meditations. His meditations and his method of approaching philosophical questioning all derive from a rationalist ideology. Therefore he argues that all humans are thinking beings and have ideas prior to experience due to their intellectual existence and not of a sensual one. His meditations are primarily to dismiss Empiricism and to reveal that doubt is necessary to our life. Perhaps even to warn us of the dangers of our own deceitfulness and not to trust anything forced upon us by our perceptions. That is why God is so important to his meditations; as Descartes believes God is perfect and cannot be deceived and cannot fail us therefore in his trust we do not need to doubt.…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Cogito ergo Sum”( ….) . This conditional statement translates to “ I think, therefore, I am” and he presents that his ability to have consciences confirms his existence. After doubting God Descartes proves his existence in his Meditations on First Philosophy, he affirms the existence of God with an ontological view. This view suggests that the ability of one to think…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes desires an absolute proof of God’s existence, and to achieve this end, he applies his skeptical method. Descartes rejects any opinions or judgments he previously accepted, and attempts to start from nothing, to build his proof of God on certified reasoning. From his new position, every idea is challenged on all ends to assure its validity.…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes proves that God exists in his third meditation. He proves that God exists because he wants to be certain about things outside of himself. But, he cannot be certain of these things if he is ignorant about the existence of God. This is because if a supreme God exists, he could cause Descartes to be mistaken in the one avenue to certainty that he has. This avenue is known as clear and distinct perception, and, according to Descartes, it is what is necessary to be certain about a thing. However, a supreme God could easily be deceiving him even when he thinks he is correct as a result of this clear and distinct perception. This is known as the metaphysical doubt. Therefore, to remove this basis for doubt, it is important to Descartes to establish whether this supreme God is capable of deceiving him. But first, he must establish whether this God exists.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "Give a detailed account of Descartes ' systematic doubt or methodical doubt in Meditation 1, making it certain that you distinguish between real doubts and so called hypothetical/metaphysical doubts. Then, explain in detail, exactly how Descartes dispels each and every one of these doubts during the course of the subsequent Meditations beginning with the cogito. Do you think that Descartes has been completely successful? Explain."The main goal of Descartes in Meditations on First Philosophy was to find truth behind all of his beliefs in order to build a solid foundation of certainty, and to focus his beliefs strictly on his idea of certainty; essentially to question knowledge. Descartes beliefs are mainly based on the theory that, if someone thinks that they really know something, they must be correct. Descartes meditations bring…

    • 3392 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another philosophical reference found in the Matrix is the work of René Descartes. He is responsible for Cartesian coordinates, a system that specifies each point uniquely in a plane by a pair of numerical coordinates, and the phrase, “I think, therefore I am.” In his book Meditations on First Philosophy, he poses the question of how we can know that the world we experience daily is not an illusion being forced upon us by an evil demon. Because we believe what we see and feel when we are dreaming, how can we trust that our senses will tell us when we are no longer dreaming. If senses cannot provide us with proof that the world we live in actually exists, then senses are unreliable and that for all we know, the world might be under the control…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes argues that we often have perceptions in life that seem incredibly obvious and unquestionable, things that surely must be real. Yet at times our senses can deceive us. But why would God deceive us if he is the model of perfection? Instilling a fault from a faultless being doesn’t make sense, as doing such would go against him being as impeccable as he is, unless it isn’t god who is behind this curtain of confusion, but instead a deceiver, a cunning demon causing me to question my own judgements.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    BETWEEN APPEARANCE AND REALITY Bertrand Russell once asked, “Is there any knowledge in the world which is so certain that no reasonable man could doubt it?” (Cahn, 2012) In his own method, he believed this to be false; after all, everyone perceives the world differently than the person next to them. By using a table as an example, he explains that everything should be questioned, even the things that appear to be absolute. In this paper, Russell’s theory is compared to those of René Descartes and David Hume. Descartes convinces himself that everything in life is a falsehood; from the world around him to his very limbs. To combat this, he views everything as deception. He admits to being “lazy” occasionally, slipping into the habit of believing instead of doubting the things around him.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the Meditations, Descartes successfully establishes methodical doubt about math and all sensory information, however, his answer to the doubt cast by the Evil Demon ploy does not fully relieve the dilemma of skepticism that his intense application of doubt has brought forth. Ultimately, Descartes is unable to satisfactorily answer the Evil Demon doubt because his argument does not prove that God’s existence would not prevent the serious errors in judgment and perception caused by the Evil Demon doubt.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes’ first meditation, his main objective is to present three skeptical arguments to bring doubt upon what he considers his basic beliefs. Descartes believes this to be an intricate part of his complete epistemological argument. Descartes skeptical arguments are not intended to be a denial of his basic beliefs. On the contrary, he uses these arguments to help prove one of his main theses, which is the existence of God. One of the main premises that Descartes uses in his proof for the existence of God comes from the evil demon argument, which he proposed, in the first meditation. It is this evil demon argument, which will be the topic of the following discussion.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes was a foundationalist. His goal was to find certain indubitable ideas to use as a foundation to build his thoughts. His aim was to find a single or multiple certainties to build his thoughts off of. Descartes figures that if he can come up with a hyperbolic doubt and some idea can still survive through this ultimate doubt then this is the most certain scenario. This hyperbolic doubt becomes to believe is, “ not that there is a supremely good God who is the source of all truth, but that there is an evil demon supremely powerful and cunning, who works as hard as he can to deceive me” (Descartes 159). In Meditation III of his Meditations, Descartes aim to prove that this assumption is not true. By proving God, Descarte proves that…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes’ Argument for the Existence of God Descartes’ Meditations serve as a faithful yet skeptical support for the existence of God. He uses a method of doubt, calling all of knowledge into question, to pursue a deep level of God and human’s existence. He creates controversial circular reasoning when he creates rules to define the existence of God through the use of the Truth Principle, the causal principle, and the belief that God is no deceiver, which all support one another. To argue the existence of God succeeding the method of doubt, an understanding of fundamental truth must be retained; The Cogito, or the argument for existence.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Fourth Meditation, "Truth and falsity," Descartes elucidates his understanding that he is somewhere between God – perfection – and nothingness. However, if God is a perfect creator He should carry the ability to construct faultless beings. To this, Descartes states that God’s aims and motives are inconceivable to finite beings. Thus, Descartes embarks on a search for the cause of his errors. He begins with intellect and claims that it cannot be the source of his errors as intellect limits an individual’s ability to judge ideas.…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "I think, therefore I am"

    • 559 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A common objection to Descartes ' theory is that an evil demon could be making one think that "I am". Descartes ' reasons for doubt are that his senses are misleading him, the possibility of him dreaming, or the mischievous God that dwells on deceiving him. Even if he was being deceived, he is still a thinking thing since he recognizes himself being misled. One cannot be tricked unless they actually exist. In order for him to trust his own ideas, he must believe that a non-deceiving God exists. To be certain that this God exists, he must be able…

    • 559 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays