Preview

Describe The Differences Between The House And The Senate

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1150 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Describe The Differences Between The House And The Senate
removed from the public. The Senate also deals with all appointments made by the President and oversees impeachment trials. It is the more stable legislative body out of the two due to its long term limits, and lack of rapid and sudden change. The six year terms help the Senate by giving Senators more time to focus on issues and not have to worry about elections. Senators can take time to attend to matter such as approving cabinet members. The Senate also operates more in a generalist fashion with more of its members relying on other members to help make decisions. Senators also are not as focused on their individual states. Senators are sometimes representing millions of people so it is impossible to get every opinion needed to make …show more content…
Often times Senators are making decisions based more so on their own opinions and beliefs rather than those of their constituencies, which effects the way that Senators campaign. Senators often times also rely heavily on party politics to make their decisions because usually, depending on their state, there are reasonable assumptions that can be made based on party allegiance. The United States Senate is set up in a way to tackle major issues plaguing the United States. It is structured in a way to share power evenly, and ensure that big picture issues are addressed properly. Both the House and the Senate are integral parts of the United States legislative process, but they are very different, and those differences make for very different roles in the process. The House and the Senate often times play off one another, picking up in areas where the other is lacking. For example, the Senate is a smaller more intimate body which helps the deliberation process. However, this small number of Senators means that less opinions are being represented fairly. The House is able to balance this inequity by representing based …show more content…
The biggest, and most notable short coming of Congress’s design is the democracy gap that sometimes occurs. This gap between legislators and the public most often occurs in the Senate, with Senators being responsible for representing thousands, and even sometimes millions, of people. With two people representing so many Americans it is hard for the public to actually be heard in the Senate. This issue also affects the way that Senators campaign, and could greatly hurt incumbents in the Senate. Senators often run on the idea that their decision making skills will mirror the ideology of the state, but if they cannot deliver on that promise they are in jeopardy of losing the publics support. For example, while I know who my Senators are I never am in any form of contact with them. I could write to them and try to explain to them my views, but as a member of the voting public I do not feel as though they will actually respond or take my opinions into great consideration. This gap also hits the House of Representatives, specifically during elections. Due to the short terms in the House Representatives find themselves trying to campaign during the latter portion of their terms meaning that their focus on legislating my waiver. For example, my representative, Josh Gottheimer, is someone who I am

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The first step they must achieve is reelection. The reelection stage is when they establish a home style. By earning the trust of their district’s voters, it is easier to justify their decisions of policy making. This makes the goals of receiving power and good public policy possible. These next two steps involve a congressman’s career in Washington. They must achieve to pass laws that are beneficial to their home district. Good public policy is established to keep existing voters and to allow for a new base of supporters. Once they do this, congressmen must find a balance between their home style and Washington career. First, to distribute their power, a congressman can appoint a higher number of local staff. This makes up for their absence at their home district while working in Washington. The next way a congressman must balance their power is to use their influence in Washington to benefit their home district. The happier a congressman’s support system is, the more likely it is that they will get reelected. When a congressman finds the proper balance of the three main goals, it will ensure a thriving…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Senate’s purpose is to be a second thought on legislative proposals after the House of Commons.[1] Members of the Senate are supposed to be a check and balance on the House of Commons. The Father of Confederacy designed the Senate for that reason. They are to be always checking on the other chamber and making sure legislation is going as it should be. Bicameral legislatures are common throughout the world and date back to early as the seventeen hundreds. Such countries as the United States of America (1787), German Confederation (1871), Australia (1901), Germany (1949), and India (1950).[2] Having a “…second chamber promotes democracy and protects democracy and protects minority rights by curbing high-handedness and arrogance in Cabinet and Commons.”[3] The Senate is a second chamber that the founder’s of this country envisioned and it serves as a check on the House and is apart of the bicameralism system.…

    • 3508 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They are not bound to the vote of their constituents, and I like that. The representatives know about the topics and things of that nature when voting, so they can vote differently than their majority. What the constituents may want now could just as well hurt them later in the long run, and if the representative can see that and vote differently, then that is the best, even if it does not seem so at the time.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those in favour of electing Senators believe that the process of an election would make the Senate democratically legitimate, but in reality it would throw our…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The senate of the United States shall be composed of two senators from each state, chosen by the legislatures…” (US Constitution, Article 1 Section 3 Clause 1, Doc D). This is very important in making sure there isn’t tyranny in the US because if the senators were chosen by population, the bigger states would have power over small states. This could end in tyranny. The big states would have more power over the smaller states because senators make big decisions and since the bigger states would have more votes, they would be able to do whatever they wanted to…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The US federal legislature is bicameral, therefore it consists of the Senate and the House of Representatives, and in theory they should both be of equal power. However, in reality it is the Senate which is considered to hold the most power, although there are arguments to in favour of them having equal rights. In order to reach a balanced judgement I will consider both sides of the argument, beginning with the claim that the Senate is more powerful than the House of Representatives.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sydni Repsone Paper 5

    • 1028 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Congress, there are several different people that uphold various responsibilities, in which all play a very large role. To start with, there are two houses, the House…

    • 1028 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Members of Congress hold more loyalty towards their home states than to their party, because it is the appeasement of the state that will ensure their careers. Also, along with the “folks back home” attitude, there is the influence of pressure groups on various members of Congress, more so than the pressure to vote along party lines. A President can try to combat this with the coattails effect, though this is only effective if a President is well liked. A Congress member endorsed by a well-liked President can ensure is re-election, at the price of toeing party lines. However, the United States system prides itself on a strict separation of powers and does not suffer from the elective dictatorships such as Tony Blair in the United Kingdom, even the Presidential veto of a bill can be overturned by a two-thirds majority. However, these are difficult to achieve, but if they are, they can make a President look weak or…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    today? First is the argument of corruption. Members of Congress gain power and influence if they serve for a long period of time, which make it tempting to base their policies, votes, and actions on their own self-interest. Take for example Congressmen William J. Jefferson, whom after 18 years of serving in the House of Representatives (9 terms) was caught with hundreds of millions of dollars from bribes of companies who he helped do business in Africa. Either there are no term limits, which means more time to gain power and be corrupt, or there is a one-term limit, which limits time for corruption and encourages ethical policies for…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Congressional Outline Ap Gov

    • 2661 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Members of Congress serve dual roles. On the one hand, they are law and policy makers, and on the other, they represent the needs and best interests of their particular constituents. These duties are often at odds. Public cynicism about the institution is also nudged along by negative media coverage and the fact that people are often uninformed about what Congress does how it does it, and the constraints under which it operates. Citizens also tend to hold Congress to very high standards and that further contributes to cynicism about the institution when they do not live up to those expectations.…

    • 2661 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although not mentioned in the Constitution Congressional committees have become an essential tool in Congress as its membership has increased and an expansion in government involvement in economic and social life has required a far greater volume of legislation and increased scrutiny of the executive. Select committees are permanent and therefore members of a committee who are re-elected gain a large amount of expertise in the policy area the committee deals with and a large amount of skill in executive scrutiny. The main functions of committees are the scrutiny of legislation in their field of speciality (N.B. this involves the power to stop a bill), the scrutiny of executive departments and basic 'housekeeping' and co-ordination roles. Congressional committees are powerful, well-funded, well-staffed (large numbers of researchers) and respected as important bodies. For this reason members want to serve; also they may advance in the party through good committee service and also through committee membership have a more powerful influence on the legislative process and may gain a degree of control over legislation of particular importance to their…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Everyone knows that the government has three branches, the legislative, executive, and judicial, these three branches separate the power of the government. The legislative branch being the ‘Lawmaker’ by having the authority to create laws, the legislative branch is the most different out of the trio, established by the first article of the constitution is home to both the Senate and House of Representatives. Not only does the branch make laws, however, it also can impeach federal officers, initiate revenue bills, and finally, elect the President in the case of the electoral college vote resulting in a tie. Each state has two senators, this means that there are one-hundred senators in total for the United States, although they were once elected…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The House was originally envisioned to act as an avenue to reflect the people’s pressing concerns, while the Senate was designed for passionate debates and subject proposals for greater deliberation. The requirement that both bodies must approve of legislation helps to protect our rights and prevents a rushed decision. Every two years seats are up for elections so the representative’s observe popular opinion in their districts. They keep a high profile in their representative communities and stay close with voters to keep their constituents happy.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is a fact that the Senate and the House of Representatives are two completely different houses. It is also proven that both houses are needed to work together to benefit America and its…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlike descriptive representation, agency representation is solely based on accountability instead of similarity. In this type of representation, constituents hold representatives accountable due to the constituents’ role in reelection. The ability to hold representatives accountable for their actions in congress gives the representatives a strong incentive, which overrides the fact that representatives do not share the same values as constituents. However, this accountability has a backlash in the congress. Due to the large amount of agency representation prevalent in the United States Congress, gridlock is occurring based on the increasing polarity in constituents. Since agents are forced to represent the polarized views of constituents, there is a high amount of disagreement on policy. This exact issue caused former Speaker of the House, John Boehner, to resign. In the New York Times article, “John Boehner, Strong Abortion Foe, Is Imperiled by the Like-Minded,” John Boehner is facing pressure from severely right-wing conservatives that is pushing Boehner to oppose Obama’s plan to give federal funding to Planned Parenthood (NYT, 9/18, A1). The increasing push of conservatives towards the right wing caused greater opposition to Boehner and his positions on funding for Planned Parenthood and other plans, such as the debt ceiling (NYT, 9/18, A1). Unfortunately, the increasing divide in partisanship eventually caused Boehner to resign as Speaker of the House. In the New York Times article, “John Boehner, House Speaker, Will Resign From Congress”, Boehner says that his resignation is due to his belief that remaining as speaker of the house is directly “do irreparable harm to the institution” (NYT, 9/26,…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays