Preview

Deter Crime

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
695 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Deter Crime
Why Would This Make Criminals Think Twice

In a society known for high crime rates would anyone really think twice before committing the actual felony. In many cases the criminal has to premeditate on how he go about getting the job done and how he can get away. Also, im sure its not at the best of his leisure to go back and double think about what he is doing and what might the repercussions to his actions truly be. In this lifetime death penalty is not anymore of a deterrent than life in prison.Therefore, I agree that death penalty does not deter crime.

Today many people can be going through lots of stress in life and feel that they need something to take their mind off of it but within the time period something might go wrong and without thinking they might snap which will result into something terrible or worse fatal. If you haven’t most of the crimes that are committed nowadays are crimes that aren’t thought out. The majority of times crimes take place is because of stored up anger, revenge for a loved one, or drug and alcohol abuse. Deterrence brings in the thought process of what should and should not be done but once you have committed the crime there is pretty much no turning back until proven not guilty in the court of law. Most people who commit murders though never expect to get caught or think out the life sentence for what they have done when its all over. If you think about it you realize that there is no better deterrent than the threat of life in jail.

The impact that deterrence has on country with death penalty is not so huge. “87% of the expert criminologists believe that abolition of the death penalty would not have any significant effect on murder rates”( M. Radelet). It was said that just because death penalty was in the question it distracted the the whole congress and board members to even finding solutions to the crimes. In many states there have been various polls that see how the people of each state felt about the effect

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ron Fridell states, "The basic principles of deterrence are that punishments are necessary to deter crime and encourage law abiding behavior. Punishment must also fit the crime with more serious crimes requiring more serious punishments. (61) I agree with the author because capital punishment serves as a device to discourage certain forms of behavior by making the consequences of these actions unpleasant. Capital punishment is acceptable under those terms and it is necessity to the betterment of society. Micheal Kronwetter said, "No other punishment deters men so effectively…as the punishment of death."(19) As an example, murder peaked in 1990 with 2,200 deaths, when New York did not have the death penalty. In 1997, when capital punishment was reinstated the murders for the year totaled 767. Deterrence obviously worked in relation to these crimes. There seems to be a direct relationship between deterrence and the effects of capital…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ACC/290 team paper

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The death penalty is set in place to punish individuals for the most violent crimes. Its purpose to keep the death penalty legal was to deter people from doing these horrible crimes. That attempt has failed terribly. According to a report conducted by the National Research Council, it was said that we could not depend on the death penalty to deter the effect of murder rates. “Claiming that the death penalty has a deterrent effect on murder rates are fundamentally flawed and should not be used when making policy decisions” (Radelet & Locock, 2012).…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Crime is a major problem in our world today. Some people in our country live in fear that they will be the next victim of a crime; they could be robbed, raped, or even murdered. There are so many theories on how to stop crime. One of the theories is the use of the death penalty as a deterrent. There are a lot of issues that surround that idea that make the use of the death penalty just as bad as the accused committing murder. It is very contradictive, inconsistent, and unethical. Although some people believe that the death penalty deters crime, there are many arguments against it. For example, the costs are extremely high, racism is involved, and there are innocent people on death row to list a few.…

    • 2253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some may say that the death penalty is helpful to society because it intimidates criminals into committing less crimes, particularly murders, when in reality, studies like one done by Benjamin S. Tyree of the University of Richmond show that there is no correlation between the use of the death penalty and lower murder rates, and if anything, states that do not use the death penalty, have lower murder rates than those that do (Deter, Tyree). If that is the case, then it is obvious that the death penalty does not benefit our country.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminal deterrence will continue to be a valuable part of criminological studies. The rational choice perspective has expanded tremendously in the last few decades. It allows criminologist to examine the reasoning process of not only offenders, but the victims as well. The concept of deterrence assumes a much higher degree of rationality. Deterrence doctrine uses the three functions of certainty, severity, and speed of punishment as key elements in the rational decision making process aimed at deciding between criminal and non-criminal paths of conduct (2013). The death penalty does serve as a deterrence from crime. But studies have indicated this might not be the case for every offender. But I would argue that even the deterrence of one individual…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The goal of the law is to discourage would-be criminals from unlawful actions. Murder, being the worst crime to commit should have the worst punishment available to deter it, and that is the death penalty. Studied in the field of behavioural psychology, this harsh punishment is negative reinforcement, meaning to insist on acceptable behaviour to avoid the very negative outcome, death, the thing which we fear the most. Those that are not deterred will not be deterred by anything else. This would deterrence result in fewer murderers, and a decrease in…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In the early 1970, the top argument in favor of the death penalty was general deterrence” (Radelet & Borg, 2000, page 2). The authors argue that the death penalty does not prevent others from committing the same offense. They describe how deterrence studies have failed to support the hypothesis that the death penalty is more effective at preventing criminal homicides than along imprisonment.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before I proceed, I think it best to delve further into to the basics of criminal Deterrence, and what it is. Deterrence is based on the concept that if the consequence of committing a crime outweighs the benefits of the crime, then the perpetrator will be deterred from committing said crime. This is all in the idea that as humans we all know the difference between right and wrong and that with criminal behavior, a penalty is bound to follow, when an individual acts, they’re doing so out of free will and they know what they’re doing, be it right or wrong. Ironically the deterrence model is flawed to an extent with it’s thinking; criminals are rational, a murderer may be a murderer for the same reasons I choose to work as a salesman for the time being: because the profession makes him better off than anything else available to them. The model fails to realise that murderers, or anyone who commits crime for that matter, are constantly outweighing the benefits and repercussions of any actions they may commit, not thinking of what may be a rational and sound decision to others.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pojman Death Penalty

    • 2171 Words
    • 9 Pages

    I agree that the people who kill should be punished severely and depending on the case sometimes be put to death. I also agree that it is possible that the death penalty may deter people from killing because of their fear of death, but I don’t think it would deter as many people as Pojman may think it will. I am confident enough to believe that while someone is committing a cold-blooded crime like killing someone what is going through his or her head is not the possible consequence. They are usually acting out of passion or out of fear, not thinking about how this may put them in the electric chair. You can also look at the situation of criminals that get out of jail but when they get out they keep committing crimes because they are so into what they are doing they forget that they are going to be punished. That is the main argument against the idea of deterrence, along with the fact that here is absolutely no evidence in the states with the death penalty that there are fewer murders. Actually many states in the south have the death penalty and at the same time have higher murder rates than states in the northeast without the death…

    • 2171 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Deterrence came about in the eighteenth century when society deemed that anyone capable of rational though would clearly not commit a crime if they knew that the punishment for said crime would outweigh any of the benefits of committing said crime. In other words they would not be dumb enough to commit a crime when they knew that they would get in to more trouble than it was worth to commit the crime. Every day on the way to work you have a choice to leave early reaching your destination without breaking the law by speeding. If you are late, you might choose to speed knowing the consequences of speeding ahead of time. A speeding ticket may be a worthy risk to someone who is late to work for the third day in a row. Murder on the other hand may not be a worthy risk since the pain of Murder’s punishment is much worse than a ticket to most citizens. Deterrence was meant to stave off harsher punishments such as death in hopes the imprisonment would scare them off from committing the crime in the first…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    People who support the death penalty would argue that the death penalty deters people from murder because they are scared of being sentenced to death. It might scare some people, but the vast majority of murders would kill anyway, for most murders are not rationalizing their actions. Also, according to some being sentenced to life is a worse punishment than the death penalty for death would put them out of their misery. The life sentence is just as bad as a death sentence, so why have the death penalty at all? The death penalty is not beneficial. It only creates problems.…

    • 2248 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty keeps the population safe by providing a deterrent for crime. Without the death penalty, the consequences for committing murder are not as feared. According to an essay by Professor Jeffrey A. Fagan, “executions [do] not only deter murders” (Fagan 1) with the death penalty in use, many criminals would think twice about committing a crime. Without the fear of capital punishment, many would-be criminals become actual criminals. In addition, for people already serving a life sentence, there is nothing to stop them from murdering other prisoners or guards constantly while in prison (Messerli 2). By using the death penalty as a deterrent, there are fewer murders as well as fewer other serious crimes. Many jails are faced with the problem of too many inmates and not enough space and resources (Messerli 2). When jails are overpopulated, it becomes harder for law enforcement to…

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime Control Strategies

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Criminal behavior is explained, as "no matter how destructive or seemingly irresponsible, is actually a matter of thought and decision making"(L.J. Siegle, 2012, p. 102). Situational crime prevention is a strategy is what they try to use on someone who isn't yet a criminal or will be a criminal they try to set up guards or home security systems to try and leer the criminal away and making the people less likely targets. This effect doesn't always work, because it will be ignored if they have their minds made up. General deterrence strategies are strategies that were meant to make a criminal think before they acted, because if they act upon their decision they will have penalties and punishments of all sorts with the law. This is effective if people actually fear punishment, but most people know there are consequences for their actions and they chose to ignore it and set out on their task anyways. Another strategy is specific deterrence strategy, this strategy is known to people who are already criminals to not repeat their acts and give them severe punishments due to the crimes that they have committed. If they do commit the act they will be put in very strict prisons and maybe not even the possibility of getting back out from behind the prison walls. The only bad effect of this is, people still choose to ignore what they have done and commit the crimes again anyways instead of the crime going down. The last strategy is incapacitation Strategies, these strategies are known to stop motivated offenders and to try to reduce the crimes…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the benefits of the death penalty is deterrence. Punishment has always been used in order to discourage potential criminals from any activity which is unlawful. Murder is a very great crime and hence society should has the right to use very strong punishment (death penalty) to deter would be criminals. This instills a sense of fear to potential murderers. This is because all human beings fear death above everything else. Studies and analysis conducted reveal that the death penalty can indeed deter murder. Swift and efficient punishment methods such as the death penalty are the most likely to lead to deterrence. Death penalty does not only deter potential murderers but it also deters prisoners form committing crime (Siegel 512).…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime Prevention

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Criminal Justice and the juvenile justice systems are almost the same but are different. When corrections’ officials have to deal with juvenile detainees, such a situation needs to be dealt with care. In identifying such situations, we will look at child development, punishment and deterrence.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays