Preview

Determinants of Capital Structure

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2652 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Determinants of Capital Structure
Assignment No. 2
Determinants of capital structure
In finance, capital structure refers to the way a corporation finances its assets through some combination of equity, debt, or hybrid securities. A firm 's capital structure is then the composition or 'structure ' of its liabilities. Simply, capital structure refers to the mix of debt and equity used by a firm in financing its assets. The capital structure decision is one of the most important decisions made by financial management. The capital structure decision is at the center of many other decisions in the area of corporate finance. These include dividend policy, project financing, issue of long term securities, financing of mergers, buyouts and so on. One of the many objectives of a corporate financial manager is to ensure the lower cost of capital and thus maximize the wealth of shareholders. Capital structure is one of the effective tools of management to manage the cost of capital. An optimal capital structure is reached at a point where the cost of the capital is minimum. Whether or not such an optimal capital structure exists? What are the potential determinants of such optimal capital structure? These are the questions to be answered by a researcher.

Related Literature
The first paper on capital structure was written by Miller and Modigliani in 1958. They conceptually proved that the value of firm in not dependent upon the capital structure decision given that certain conditions are met. Because of the unrealistic assumptions in MM irrelevance theory, research on capital structure gave birth to other theories. The trade off theory says that a firm’s adjustment toward an optimal leverage is influenced by three factors namely taxes, costs of financial distress and agency costs. Baxter (1967) argued that the extensive use of debt increases the chances of bankruptcy because of which creditors demand extra risk premium. He said that firms should not use debt beyond the point where the cost of debt

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Team D1 Case 3

    • 3739 Words
    • 32 Pages

    The Board must seek a strategy that maximizes capital structure value. Any firm’s capital structure is a mix of debt and equity that maximizes the stock price (Brigham & Ehrhardt, 2014). Entities finance their operations through debt or its own capital. Debt can exist in many forms such as bond issues or long-term notes payable (loans, credit lines, etc.). Capital (or equity) can be stock or retained earnings. The reasons for using various financing options from each category are numerous. One of the leading factors is risk. Nobody wants risk, but without it there can be no reward. Also, it is important to weigh the value of maintaining the firm’s capital (earned interest) versus the cost of debt (interest paid) and figure in the…

    • 3739 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    6. Understand capital structure theories as well as real world factors that affect capital structure decisions…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fins1613 Final Exam Notes

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Financing Decisions: Capital Structure – the mixture of debt and equity maintained by a firm.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thirdly, the report then aims to determine the optimal capital structure for the organisation. Several determinants of the optimal capital structure such as profitability, income, tax rates, growth etc. were analysed. Various managerial theories were considered, such as the trade-off theory, Agency theory, Stakeholder theory and the Predation theory to determine the optimal capital structure.…

    • 6098 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case 32

    • 333 Words
    • 1 Page

    The case continues by further describing these three steps in more detail and elements that entail them. Such as understanding the elements of financial policy that include: mix of classes of capital, maturity structure of the firm’s capital, basis of the firm’s coupon and dividend payments, currency, exotica, external control, and distribution. It also encourages the analyst to always to focus in the perspective of the investors when deciding on the best capital structure option. This structure should include the maximizing of shareholder wealth, maximizing the value of the firm, and minimizing the firm’s WACC.…

    • 333 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: 1. Adrienn, H. (2014). SUMMARY OF THEORIES IN CAPITAL STRUCTURE DECISIONS. Annals Of The University Of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 23(1), 912-918.…

    • 2752 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to analyze Ford Motor Company’s capital structure to understand the financial risks and companies financial make up. The research paper will also discuss the Modigliani and Miller capital structure theory including common criticisms. To understand Fords profitability we will take a close look at their financial ratios including stock rates and future analysis of the company’s assets. Research was done by reading news articles, online periodicals and stock references including Fords own annual reports and website. In conclusions we will understand the optimal structure for Ford Motor Company and what should be done to ensure continued success within an ever changing industry.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although these assumptions made by MM are unrealistic, they have indicated and provided us clues on what is required for capital structure to be relevant and what affects a firm’s value. (Brigham et al, 2004)…

    • 5736 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wrigley Jr. Company

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages

    According to the trade-off theory, the optimal capital structure does exist (Kraus and Litzenberger, 1973). The higher level of debt may increase both bankruptcy and financial cost that lead the firm to go or avoid bankruptcy. However, there are several advantages of raising debt capital. Firstly, tax-deductions which decrease the cost of debt. Secondly, stockholders do not have to share the profit when the firm has excess, as debt holders are limited to their fixed return. Finally, stockholders do have voting right but debt holders do not which means the stockholders are controlling the business.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capital structure is very important. Not only does it influence the return a company earns for its shareholders but can also be a determining factor on whether or not a firm survives a recession. A company’s capital structure is a mix of their short-term debt, long-term debt, and equity. A firm’s capital structure is the way the firm finances all of its operations, investments, and growth. When a firm’s debt-to-equity ratio maximizes its value and minimizes the firm’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC), it is said to be at the “target” or “optimal capital structure”. Debt usually offers a lower cost of capital because of the ability to deduct tax from interest, but the company’s risk increases as debt increases.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nicos Michealas, Francis Chittenden and Panikkos Poutziouris. A model of Capital Structure decision making in small firms. Henry Stewart publications (1998) 246-260…

    • 9937 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2 Capital Structure 1

    • 1205 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Differ in their relative emphasis on factors that could affect the choice b/w D & E…

    • 1205 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital Structure

    • 4827 Words
    • 20 Pages

    The transactions in secondary market pass through three distinct phases, viz., trading, clearing and settlement. While the stock exchanges provide the platform for trading, the clearing corporation determines the funds and securities obligations of the trading members and ensures that the trade is settled through exchange of obligations. The clearing banks and the depositories provide the necessary interface between the custodians/clearing members for settlement of funds and securities obligations of trading members. Several entities, like the clearing corporation, clearing members, custodians, clearing banks, depositories are involved in the process of clearing. The role of each of these entities is explained below: a. Clearing Corporation: The clearing corporation is responsible for post-trade activities such as risk management and clearing and settlement of trades executed on a stock exchange. The first clearing corporation to be established in the country and also the first clearing corporation in the country to introduce settlement guarantee is the National Securities Clearing Corporation Ltd. (NSCCL), a wholly owned subsidiary of NSE. NSCCL was incorporated in August 1995. It was set up with the objectives of bringing and sustaining confidence in clearing and settlement of securities; promoting and maintaining short and consistent settlement cycles; providing counter-party risk guarantee, and operating a tight risk containment system. b. Clearing Members: Clearing Members are responsible for settling their obligations as determined by the clearing corporation. They do so by making available funds and/or securities in the designated accounts with clearing bank/ depositories on the date of settlement. c. Custodians: Custodians are clearing members but not trading members. They settle trades on behalf of trading members, when a particular trade is…

    • 4827 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kale et al (1991) suggests that the level of risk is one of the main determinants of a firm`s capital structure. By looking at the trade off theory we might expect a negative association when risk and leverage are concerned. If firms have high earnings volatility, for some obvious reasons, they would not want to indulge in debt financing. It follows that when firms are exposed to bankruptcy and agency costs greater is the incentive to reduce the level of debt otherwise the more volatile a firm`s earnings are, the more risk is there of defaulting and being exposed to such costs. As stated by Viviani(2008) firms that have high operating risk can lower the volatility of the net profit by reducing the level of debt. Empirical studies which show this negative relationship are Booth et al(2001); Fama and French (2002); Jong et al (2008). Growth: As stated by the pecking order arguments growth should have a positive relationship with debt ratio of a firm (Myers, 1984). These tend to be so because of asymmetric information problem across outside investors and firms managers that has more growth opportunities than the asset they have (particularly small firms). The perking order theory therefore implies a positive relationship between growth and debt level (Benito, 2003; De Angelo and Masulis, 1980; Hall et al., 2000; Jensen, 1986; Myers, 1984; Myers and Majulif, 1984; Zou and Xiao, 2006). On the contrary there is a negative relationship between growth and debt level which is stated by the trade-off theory (Jensen and Meckling, 1976; Myers, 1977; Stulz, 1990). This is due to firm financial distress cost rising as with growth opportunities firm would bear more risk.Auberch (1985) argues that since fast growing firms have non-debt tax shields, the tax deductibility of interest payment is less valuable which conclude that leverage is inversely related to growth. Rajan and Zingales (1985) also found a negative relationship between growth and leverage. Recent studies has…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most important building block of the contemporary understanding of capital structure is the Modigliani-Miller proposition about the irrelevance of capital structure. It argues that under the assumptions listed below, capital structure does not affect company value (Frank and Goyal, 2007).…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays