Preview

Deterrence and Rational Choice Theory of Crime

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3077 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Deterrence and Rational Choice Theory of Crime
The issue of whether decision making by criminals is a rational process is a heated topic of discussion when one asserts that crime is the role of choice. Before the classical school of criminology, crime was thought to be the product of the paranormal occurrence of demons, witches, ghouls, and other creatures. The time prior to the classical school of criminology, called the preclassical era, is divided in two parts. Before the time of state intervention into private matters, each individual dealt with violations of their rights. This was a problem because of the continuous cycle of violence being perpetuated. Soon the State (and even the Church) took on the task of dispensing law and order to the masses of the Middle Ages. This led to a period called the Holy Inquisition which lasted from the twelfth century to the eighteenth century. During the Holy Inquisition, punishment that was harsh and capricious was the norm. Also, there was no protection against bogus allegations, meaning, the burden of proof was on the accused to prove his/her innocence. The classical school of criminology was a response to the harsh times of the Holy Inquisition. It was a product of the Enlightenment, seeking to replace the notions of the divine rights of royalty and clergy with rationalism, intellectualism, and humanitarianism. The two chief ambassadors of the classical school of criminology are Cesare Beccaria (1738-1794) and Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832). Beccaria is widely recognized as the father of the classical school of criminology. In his essay Dei deliti e delle pene (On Crimes and Punishment), Beccaria asserted that humans are rational, have free will, and are hedonistic. He also claimed that crime can be prevented by convincing warnings of punishments. To succeed in preventing crime, certainty, severity, and celerity of punishment must be present. Jeremy Bentham embraced the utilitarian philosophy of replacing harsh and capricious punishments with humane punishments and


References: McCarthy, Bill. "New Economics of Sociological Criminology." Annual Review of Sociology. 2002 Criminology. Nov. 1994. Vol. 32, Issue 4, p. 581.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Herbert Packer has developed two important models of crime deterrence. The first, is referred to as the crime control model, a conservative approach whereby a suspect should be detained or arrested until he or she is proven guilty (Cooper, 2014). The second is referred to as the due process model. According to the basic stipulations of this model, a suspect should be presumed as being innocent until there is adequate evidence to prove that he or she is guilty. This implies that a suspect should not be detained or arrested until the due process of determining his or her involvement in crime is completed. In view of these stipulations, it is evident that the due process model is founded on a liberal approach while the crime control model is founded…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While the original crime prevention efforts of rational choice theory…to make the risks far outweigh the benefits of committing crimes, I feel this is no longer an effective view of crime in today’s world.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Classicism and its views on crime and punishment were derived from the philosophy of Enlightenment which gained prominence across Europe in the 18th century; this in contrast to the previous legal and penal systems from the feudal and the absolutist monarchies (Young, J 1981).…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In society, people always want to point a finger as to who did what and why. For centuries, theorists have come up with ideas to try to identify and explain why people commit crimes. What causes them the break the law, even when they know the repercussions for their actions. Many theories have been brought up, but only a few have surpassed time and are approved by society and law enforcement. These choice theories hypothesize on why how and why people commit crimes, they are also accepted through our society and they affect law enforcement as well as the government.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The deterrence model is the idea that the fear of punishment will prevent criminals or potential criminals from committing a crime. There are two different types of deterrence, which are general and specific. General deterrence is the preventing crime among the general population. The general public includes only those who have not committed a crime before. Specific deterrence is trying to prevent a specific group of people or specific person from committing a crime in the future. The deterrence model has been noted to not be effective. The deterrence model is half way effective because it does put fear in some people, but it does not exemplify all the many reasons people commit crimes. Many criminals or potential criminals may fear being…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Choice theories are based on a perspective on crime causation that holds that criminality is the result of…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Does the Perceived Risk of Punishment Deter Criminally Prone Individuals? Rational Choice, Self-Control, and Crime…

    • 14339 Words
    • 58 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ray Rice Criminology

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Part A The two criminology schools of thought in explaining why violent crimes such as the domestic violence incident with Ray Rice occur are the classical school and positivist schools of criminology. These schools were developed in an attempt better explain why crime is committed and promoting the idea of rational punishments/treatments (Lilly, Cullen, & Ball, 1995). Essentially, long before the classical and positivists schools were established popular philosophers such as Thomas Hobbes, Voltaire, and Jean Jacques-Rousseau came up with ideas on how to act rationally when concerning punishment and the causes of crime. During the middle ages, religion was highly…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The consensus model and the conflict model are the two ways society use to determine if an act is criminal. The consensus model is saying that society agrees with the views of right and wrong (Schmalleger, 2011). Consensus model is also showing society in agreement that anything that can cause harm to others is a criminal act (Schmalleger, 2011). The conflict model says that groups in power decide what a criminal act is (Schmalleger, 2011). The consensus model works together to make the system work while the conflict model argues whose view is right.…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    For hundreds of years, people have been trying to understand criminals and what causes people to act criminally. Many theories were created and some became more widely accepted than others. In the 1700s, a new perspective into criminality rose; the classical perspective. Father of the classical perspective, Cesare Beccaria, provided theories much different from the previous ideas about why people commit crimes. He and others who believed in the classical perspective focused on the idea of free will, and how people weigh the cost and benefits before committing a crime. Beccaria was also a big promoter of deterrence and how it plays a key role in helping reduce crime in societies. After the age of the classical perspective, the father of a new perspective came about, Cesare Lombroso and the positivist perspective. Backed up by theories posed by Charles Darwin, the positivist perspective quickly became widely popular. This perspective rejected the classical ideas and in turn said people do not have free will and do not rationally decide to commit a crime. Their criminal actions were based off of many outside biological, sociological, and psychological factors. Given these widely different beliefs, it is easy to set apart these two perspectives. The opposing views of free will and rational choice, the ways in which positivists think they can identify criminals, and the method for stopping crime are all major aspects that differ a lot between these viewpoints.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Randy Kraft

    • 2491 Words
    • 10 Pages

    References: Akers, R. & Sellers, C. Criminological Theories. 4th edition. Los Angeles, Ca. RoxburyPublishing Company. 2004.…

    • 2491 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Classical School of criminology emerged during the eighteenth century after the European Enlightenment period. It was during this time that law enforcement and laws were disparate and unjust and punishment was brutal. Members of the Classical School would demand justice that based on equality and human punishment that was appropriate for the offense. According to Williams and McShane 2009, the Classical School was uninterested in studying the criminal per se; it gained its association with criminology through its focus on lawmaking and legal processing. The Positive School of criminology focused on explaining and understanding social behavior of criminals. The members of this school used the approach to the study of crime, which became known as criminology. Positivists saw behavior as determined by its biological, psychological, and social traits (Williams & McShane, 2009). This paper will compare and contrast the Biology/Biosocial theory of the Positive School theory of crime and the Classical School theory of crime.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical Era Punishment

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cesare Beccaria was the author of On Crimes and Punishments. His essay was about condemning torture and the capital punishment and reformation. His essay would later be used as a guide for constructing the Bill of Rights and the U.S Constitution. He had a social contract view of society in which everyone agreed that the Lawmaker was the sovereign power who alone represented the will of all the people. He believed an effective punishment should be swift, certain, impartial, universal, and proportionate to the crime. Deterrence depends upon learning on associating cause and effect. The sooner the punishment follows on the crime, the stronger the association in the mind of the criminal. When judges stray from the punishment set…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminology arose in the mid eighteenth century, when many social philosophers gave thought to crime and law. Many social philosophers thought that the criminal justice and penal system was cruel and inhumane and wanted to change it. “The leading theorist of this classical school of criminology, the Italian Cesare Bonesano Beccaria, argued that the law must apply equally to all, and that punishments for specific crimes should be standardized by legislatures, thus avoiding judicial abuses of power. Both Beccaria and another classical theorist, the Englishman Jeremy Bentham, argued that people are…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beccaria believed that punishment should be positioned around making the society better rather than being in a vengeance. Beccaria also viewed effective punishment, in his essay “On Crimes and Punishment,” should be swift and certain. Beccaria believed that by having…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics