Preview

DeTocqueville and Mill, and the tyranny of the majority

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
982 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
DeTocqueville and Mill, and the tyranny of the majority
Threat of Tyranny of the Majority not Strong enough to "Temper" the Spirit of Democracy

In the present political spectrum, democracy is essentially understood as both the most humane and effective means by which to govern a body politic. While democracy is currently relatively non-controversial, this was not the case during its establishment. The democratic experiment in America was viewed somewhat indifferently by many of the world's prominent political philosophers. Alexis de Tocqueville and John Stuart Mill existed among those most apprehensive of the democratic experiment. To each of these men, democracy certainly possessed certain positive attributes, but at the same time, represented a potential threat to the individual freedoms of man, through a much feared 'tyranny of the majority'.

De Tocqueville and Mill both cite the possible oppression of minority groups as a significant drawback to democracy. While each author cites the 'tyranny of the majority' as a possible problem, their perceptions of the alleged problem differ in scope and definition. De Tocqueville regards the above mentioned problem largely as a hindrance to actual action on the part of minority groups and individuals; Mill discusses it relating primarily to the oppression of minority thought. De Tocqueville recognizes the ability of the government to regulate thought, but does not focus on it to the extent that Mill does.

One of the fundamental questions raised by De Tocqueville is, "When a man or party suffers an injustice in the United States, to whom can he turn?" (252) In the American democratic experience three separate branches of government exist, but, de Tocqueville does not feel that this mitigates the threat towards tyranny. Furthermore, he states, "in a democracy organized on the model of the United States there is only one authority, one source of strength and of success, and nothing outside it." (255) Under De Tocqueville, this "authority" is the majority and its reign absolute.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Dr. Leskes shares her view point on democracy and the controversy that often accompanies it, “Democracy is messy, and controversial issues have always generated strong feelings” (46). Since democracy is such…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Written by Alexis De Tocqueville, Democracy in America critiques American customs through observations. (reword) Tocqueville examines the vast differences between his own, French, culture and the new, unrefined culture that is fostering in America. He observes in mystified awe at racial relations between not only the Native Americans and the Europeans, but the Africans that were recently brought to America. The race relations which present themselves in America are inconsistent with that in Europe. Slavery in America has developed “naturally with the society to which it belongs,” it has manifested into every household and taken over the whole country, but what Tocqueville finds fascinating is the lack of economic betterment that comes from the use of slaves in everyday labor (288). To further this argument, Tocqueville employs the use of logos and effectively describes the injurious consequences…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States’ form of government is a controversial topic in this modern era and has been for decades. The big question “Is the United States a democracy, a republic or something else?” According to the article On Democracy in Our Republic by an unknown author, there is a logically reinforced thesis that the United States is a republic and not a democracy.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    AP US HISTORY

    • 3264 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The United States of America has repeatedly undergone various series in development of democracy as the central political basis on which the country was founded. Throughout history, events may or may not effectively demonstrate American democracy in its most successful form. Despite the mistakes and successes of the past, however, the United States as a…

    • 3264 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In chapter seven, Tocqueville primarily talks about the unlimited power of the omnipotence of the majority of America. The natural strengths of the majority rule are clearly elaborated by Tocqueville in two ways. First he asserts that “The very essence of democratic government consists in the absolute sovereignty of the majority” (p. 282). Meaning that the essence of democratic government has determined the inevitable fate of the superior power of majority rule in this country. On the other hand, this trend has been strengthened by the constitution of some major states in the United States. The legislature, which can be the most vulnerable governmental agency affected by the majority, is the best embodiment of the majority rule. It is due to the fact that the lawmakers are directly elected by the majority, besides, their term of service are incredibly short as compared with the great power they were…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 5 Discussion

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Majority rule is susceptible to abuse by the majority, while groups seeking to reach a consensus may fall victim to groupthink.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Samuel Adams once said, “It does not take a majority to prevail... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.”…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Importantly, democracy supposedly serves to check unaccountable power and manipulation by the few at the expense of the many, because fundamentally democracy is seen as a form of governance by the people, for the people. This is often implemented through elected representatives, which therefore requires free, transparent, and fair elections, in order to achieve legitimacy.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As one of the most famed historians of American history, Carl Becker, in the early 20th century, was a significant supporter of democracy in the American government. According to Becker, the American Revolution did not only incorporate independence as its main objective, it strived to change the conventional institutions in the government that did not involve nor concur with the spirit of the public. However, Becker advocated for an ideal democracy. A democracy in which the will of the people is respected, a government created by the people, for the people and by the people. Expounding more on the nuance of the ideal democracy based on Becker’s assertions requires a critique of his discussion, “Ideal…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tocqueville Flaws

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Democracy in the United States has had many interpretations based on success and failures, Alexis de Tocqueville initially details how in comparison to Europe, the United States has established a problematic and darker side of democracy. American Democracy like any “great experiment” is undoubtedly bound to have flaws, Tocqueville highlights these flaws he noticed on his nine-month trip to the United States. The reason Tocqueville chose to focus on the United States, in particular, is because its “development has been the most peaceful and the most complete,” therefore, his observations allowed him to see “the image of democracy itself, with its inclinations, its character, its prejudices, and its passions.” The United States served as a reference…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Colonial America’s democracy was a work in progress with democratic and undemocratic features. With features like Individual and Human Rights, Equality, and Limited Government, colonial America was continuously finding new ways to govern a new society. While, some of their strategies were undemocratic and cruel, they realized and fixed it with democratic solutions. Their efforts were enormous, and created the free land of colonial America.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Tocqueville, the primary danger and potential consequence of individualism is that citizens become apathetic. When individualism deteriorates into “general apathy,” Tocqueville claims that “anarchy and despotism” will follow (Tocqueville 704). In these two possible dystopian democracies, either tyranny of the majority or tyranny of the executive power reigns. Both the executive and the majority are “in a position to oppress” when apathy conquers the populace (Tocqueville 704). Furthermore, anarchy and despotism seem to combine in this dystopian democracy, also as a consequence of general apathy.…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Tocqueville one the main weaknesses is the individualism, which democracy brings to birth. Tocqueville writes that this feeling instigates every person “to distance their self from the crowd and to separate their family and friends in small society”. The main goal of such society is satisfying its own needs. It should be mentioned that such “phenomenon” is naturally determined because of instability and anxiety of democratic times when you always can win and lost. Thus, Tocqueville writes “the poor conceive an eager desire to acquire comfort, and the rich think of the danger of losing it…”. Yet, individualism and materialism are not the main difficulties in the democratic society. They lead to even more dangerous consequence - greater concentration of power by administration. Since people prefer to build and to care about their own “small society”, a “big society” makes significant policy decision by itself. It should be mentioned that this problem is still actual even for modern democratic societies. For instance, there is a widespread phenomenon of absenteeism in western developed countries. Therefore, citizens are interested only in those political, economical, cultural or social issues which directly influence their own “small society”.…

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato and Aristotle viewed democracy as a “chaotic rule of masses at the expense of wisdom and property”. Nineteenth century liberals agreed with this idea as they saw democracy as dangerous and feared it. They were concerned that democracy could threaten individual liberty. Democracy is necessarily collectivist, in that it places political authority in the hands of the people who are not a single entity but are turned into a collection of individuals or groups. This contradicts the liberal principle of individuality and atomistic society. Therefore this might lead in the interests of individual citizens being ignored. In society people have different opinions and opposing interests often resulting to political instability and conflict. The democratic solution to this conflict is the application of the majority rule; the principle that the will of the majority should prevail over that of the minority. Mill feared the unintended consequences of the rule of masses. Therefore nineteenth century liberals feared the negative repercussions of democracy such as the tyranny of the majority as the principle of the majority rule can result into the suppression of individual freedom and minority rights. Majoritarianism can not only ignore the interests of the minority but it can also create a culture of dull conformism, where people according to Mill become “transformed into mere industrious sheep as they defer to the judgments of the majority based on the unfounded assumption that the…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fear of Democracy

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Some political thinkers have argued that Liberalism can be defined by its fear of democracy. Democracy is ‘rule by the people’, this term suggests that there is popular participation and also public interest within government. While liberals fear democracy they know and see it as the best possible way. As there is a clear fear of it lying underneath the liberal ideology, there are obvious arguments for and against this point. Both have valid indications to say there is and isn’t a fear respectively. However this essay will be looking at both sides, not looking to give a judgement but aiming to establish these for and against arguments.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays