Preview

Development of Juvenile Justice System in India

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1639 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Development of Juvenile Justice System in India
The Indian legislations

The emergence of the concept of juvenile justice in India owes much to the developments that have taken place in western countries, especially in the perception of children and human rights jurisprudence in Europeand America. The Apprentices Act, 1850 was the first legislation that laid the foundation of juvenile justice system in the country. The concept consequently gained momentum with the enactment of the Indian Penal Code (1860), Reformatory Schools Act (1897), Code of Criminal Procedure (1898) and recommendations made by the Indian Jail Committee (1919-1920), which categorically mentioned that the child offender should be treated differently from an adult offender. It also held that imprisonment of child offenders should be prohibited and recommended for provision of reformatory schools and constitution of children’s courts with procedures ‘as informal and elastic as possible’. The Committee also drew attention to the desirability of making provisions and special enactment for children who had not committed crime so far, but could do so in the near future on account of living in criminal or inhuman surroundings or those without proper guardians or homes.

The Madras Children Act 1920 was the first Children Act to be enacted, closely followed by Bengal and Bombay in 1922 and 1924, respectively. Later, many more states enacted their own Children Acts, covering within their sphere two categories of children, viz., (i) delinquent children, and (ii) destitute and neglected children. Both these categories of children were to be handled by the juvenile courts. They were to be kept in remand homes and certified schools or released on probation, with a possibility of imprisonment when the nature of offence was serious and the character of the offender so depraved as to justify imprisonment (Ved Kumari: 2004). During this period, by and large, the “welfare”approach was adopted for children – whether delinquent, destitute or neglected.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    By the nineteenth century, many child welfare advocates reformed the country’s view on children, and the states found it counter productive to convict children along with adults. States then recognized that minors are indeed young enough to be rehabilitated. Thus being said, the United States began discussing the idea of a separate justice system specifically for juvenile cases. In 1925 an official juvenile system has been established in the United States. “Juvenile courts do not exist to punish children for their transgressions against society…The aim of the court is to provide individualized justice for children…The delinquent is the child of, rather than the enemy of society and their interests coincide.” (Ogilvie at p.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Until the late 19th century, children were tried in criminal courts along with adults. Movement for juvenile justice reform was informed by the 16th century educational reform movement in England that perceived children to be different than miniature adults, with less than fully developed moral and cognitive…

    • 3858 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Status offenses are consider minor offense that under the law of a jurisdiction would not be consider a crime if committed by an adult; such as running away, being ungovernable or incorrigible, violating curfew laws, or possessing alcohol or tobacco (American Bar Association. n.d.).…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Earlier this year the Supreme Court of the United States handed down arguably one their most important, yet controversial decisions regarding juvenile law. In the case Roper v Simmons (2005), a narrow 5-4 decision, overturned the United States practice of allowing capital punishment for juvenile offenders.…

    • 3690 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The juvenile justice system process is rather new. The juvenile justice system really changed between 1966 and 1967; with kent vs United States and in re Gualt. Both added rights to the juvenile justice system that adults get. The evolution of the system sped up after those decisions. With eight very important Supreme Court decisions after 1967 till 2012. Each expanding the juvenile justice system.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today’s Youth Justice Board came after the 1998 Crime and Disorder Act which passed to prevent young people from offending and re-offending (Home Office 2009). In the 1800’s when it came to punishment for crimes, there was no distinction between adults and children. People thought that the old forms of punishment, such as transportation and overall humiliation, were too severe for children. Mary Carpenter advocated for education rather than prison which introduced the battle between welfare and justice. After the Second World War, the 1969 Children and Young Persons Act, enhanced the importance of the welfare of children and the legal system began to consider both justice and welfare when sentencing a child.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juvenile Court Case Study

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The developments, legislative changes and legal factors on the juvenile system changed since the 1970 when the juvenile system was designed for the best interest of the juveniles, bit in the 1980’s and 1990’s the juvenile system started focusing on the criminal acts of juveniles offenders and presumed need for more coercive intervention. There are now three ways in which a juvenile can be prosecuted in the adult criminal system and that is judicial waiver, statutory exclusion, and concurrent jurisdiction.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juvenile incarceration has created a lot of uncertainties in the legal justice system. This is because it is often assumed that indeed there are several persons that are underage that at the time of the crime did not have the proper mental reasoning to appreciate that indeed they were committing a crime. For this reason, there has been several problems regarding Juvenile incarceration and it has been argued that there is a need to re-evaluate and ensure that indeed the problems that affect the system are given the proper judicial involvement and justice. . This paper is going to examine how different it is from adults and juvenile when it comes to…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juveniles have been incarcerated in secure facilities since 1974. Juveniles are committing more heinous crimes and citizens have advocated for tougher penalties on crime. They want justice for the violence perpetrated on their families, businesses and communities. The Juvenile Justice system is charged with simultaneously protecting the public as well as reforming those juveniles who are convicted and sentenced to secure facilities. Barry C. Feld (1995) believes that there is a “desire to "get tough," fueled in part by frustration with the intractability of crime, that provides political impetus to transfer some young offenders to criminal courts for prosecution as adults and to strengthen the sanctioning powers of juvenile courts”(p.966).…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Even with all the money and effort spent on the adult justice system the recidivism rate is astonishing. When we hear old sayings like "you can 't teach an old dog new tricks" or "you have to nip the problem in the bud" or "if you don 't want a rotten apple, don 't go to the barrel go to the tree", do we realize the effect these concepts could have on the crime? If we realize it 's difficult to teach old offenders new behaviors and actually focus our efforts on "nipping the problem in the bud" or attempt to save the apple from spoiling while it 's still young and on the tree, we will be able to positively affect crime in the juvenile and adult justice systems.…

    • 2168 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The question of whether we should have continued use of a separate juvenile justice system or should we abolish it is a huge debate in the U.S. Is the separate, juvenile justice system still feasible? If not, what can replace it? Policymakers need to confront these questions, and they need innovative answers. New policies should aim for more than simply abolishing the juvenile court's delinquency jurisdiction and sending all young offenders to conventional criminal courts.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many similarities and differences between the adult and juvenile justice systems. Siegel and Welsh, (2008 p. 272), states that, “the components of the adult and the juvenile criminal processes are similar, but the juvenile system has a separate organizational structure.” There are more differences than there are similarities, but only because the juvenile system is there to rehabilitate the child and not punish them. The adult system is aimed at “punishing the guilty”, (Siegel, Welsh, 2008, p. 275). The juvenile system is very lenient on the offenders, but there are also significant similarities within the two systems. Juveniles are divided into delinquents and status offenders, adults are considered criminals.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within the context of Canadian criminal justice, the youth crime is relatively minor yet teeming with excitement and interest, lying at the center of public concern over society’s future adult citizens. In its history, three different forms of legislation have come to pass; the Juvenile Delinquents Act of 1908 remained in place for seventy-six years before being replaced with the Young Offender’s Act in 1984, which was then replaced with the Youth Criminal Justice Act in 2002 (Smandych, 2016: 5). Clearly, the issue of youth justice is not lost on ‘The Great White North.' In the textbook Youth at Risk and Youth Justice: A Canadian Overview, scholars address many factors surrounding youth crime and youth criminal justice, including the overrepresentation…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juvenile Court System

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages

    North Carolina and New York are the only two states in the United States that prosecute…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juvenile Justice System

    • 2355 Words
    • 10 Pages

    . The juvenile justice system is an institution in society that is granted certain powers and responsibilities. It faces several different tasks, among the most important is maintaining order and preserving constitutional rights. The conflict arises when public expectation of order collides with the right of young people to be on the street. The police have a high level of contact with people under the age of 18. UCR data indicate that juveniles account for about 17% of all arrests and nearly 29% of arrests for Index crimes. When juveniles "hang out" on corners or ride around town, they create citizen conflict, regarding the use of public space. The term juvenile delinquent was established so that young lawbreakers could avoid being classified…

    • 2355 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays