Preview

Development of the Ancient Roman Navy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1741 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Development of the Ancient Roman Navy
Naval warfare was considered a second thought to most ancient Romans. It never carried the same prestige as that of a legionary. Before the First Punic War the Roman navy consisted mainly of allied ships and a few Roman ships that had crews that were very inexperienced. When entering the First Punic War they realized they needed to develop a navy to match the superior Carthaginian fleet. The fleet that the Romans had before the war would never withstand any naval battles. In building their navy, the Romans were able to utilize their resources, their allies’ resources, as well as some ingenuity to help overcome their naval weaknesses and defeat the Carthaginians in the First Punic War. The Romans lost many fleets and sailors throughout the course of the war but their persistence and determination ultimately helped them prevail. In the beginning, Rome founded colonies to provide coastal defence as opposed a naval force to police the shores of the surrounding territories. They used the warships and crews from naval allies, freedmen, and marines from lowest class eligible for military service. Romans dominated the sea by gaining possession of the land. Given the limited range of ships, this was an effective strategy. Ships were only constructed as a last solution to a military problem. As soon as a victory was achieved, the ships were left to wither and the naval needs were met by relying on allies. It was Rome's success on land that made such indifference about naval battles. However, if there was ever a need for naval battle, their small navy could never withstand such a task. There was very minimal naval conflict between Rome and its enemies leading up to the First Punic War. Once the Punic War began they knew the only shot they had to defeat Carthage was to create a navy that would rival that of the mighty Carthaginians. In order to rival Carthage’s navy, they would need a design for their ships, a way to build them and people to man them. The ships

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    From a snapshot of the Second Punic War, the Carthaginians defeated the Romans while under the consul of Gaius Flaminius. The battle is considered one of the largest and most successful ambushes in military history. The battle consisted of around 50,000 Carthaginian soldiers versus about 30,000 Roman soldiers. The aftermath of the battle produced well over 15,000+ lost soldiers for the Roman army while Hannibal only lost approximately 2,500 of his own. Despite the overview of the battle, much more can be examined when looking at the events leading up to the brilliant ambush set by…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Punic Wars were three conflicts between Carthage and Rome. The first conflict was from 264-241 B.C. It grew out of an altercation between Messana and Syracuse. The Messanians asked Carthage for help and Syracuse asked Rome for help. The Strait of Messana, which separated the Italian Peninsula from Sicily, was important strategically, and both Carthage and Rome responded. The Punic army (Carthaginians) arrived in Sicily and mediated peace between the two and established a military base. When the Roman army arrived, they drove off the Punic army from the military base and war ensued (Columbia…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    By 246 BCE, the Carthaginians controlled the trade routes and maritime trade in the Mediterranean. The Rome Republic was founded in 509 BCE as a result of an overthrow of Tarquinius Superbus, King of Rome. By 246 BCE, Rome, a small city, was unable to trade in the Mediterranean, only the Tiber River, but it dominated the Italian Peninsula, and only had access to the Italian Peninsula. However, Rome was growing stronger. The Punic Wars were fought to determine who controlled the trade in the…

    • 4407 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1000 BCE, a group of Latins, later known as Romans, founded the city of Rome. After almost 500 years of it being founded, the Romans set up a republic. They gained territory by force, beginning with the Italian peninsula and then easily moving to the Mediterranean region. The Romans launched a series of three wars, known as the Punic Wars. During this time, the were able to conquer Carthage and in return gained access into Sicily, Sardinia, and Corsica. Even after the Punic Wars ended, Rome still managed to gain the territory of Macedonia, Greece and even some parts of Anatolia. Even through troubling times of the empire, it still managed to spread through Gaul,…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Empire DBQ

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page

    To begin with, military weakness was a big factor in the fall of Rome. According to Document B, “...armor began to seem heavy since the soldiers rarely ever wore it.” This shows that the soldiers were very lethargic and couldn’t protect the empire effectively. They stopped doing their ground drills and never wore the breastplates. When war came to Rome they weren’t prepared to wear the armor, so instead they fought with…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hannibal’s overall war strategy in Italy, or lack thereof, can be seen as a strong contributing factor to Carthage’s ultimate defeat in the Second Punic War. Livy describes, “Hannibal…without orders from the senate, crossed both the Alps and the Ebro.” Demonstrating his defiance of Carthaginian Government’s ambitions against Rome. Ultimately, Hannibal sought not to destroy Rome but to “create a balance of power with [her]” according to Fronda. This is to suggest that rather than conquer Rome, Hannibal wanted to be on the same playing field in order to deny them the opportunity to claim hegemony over the Mediterranean. The content of the Macedonian–Carthaginian Treaty further evidences Hannibal’s lack of intention to destroy Rome as, in multiple sections, it discusses how Rome will be treated and acknowledges their…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome rule its people in a very organize and civil manner, which draws loyalty among its citizens. Rome has an effective and distinct way in managing people, particularly to the inhabitants of their newly acquired lands and territories. One of the best example was the Latins in Latium, whose devotion and loyalty were exceedingly commendable, especially during the Second Punic War, where they fought valiantly--along with the Romans --against the forces of Hannibal. On other hand, Carthage "great advantage" was they have a "permanent able leader," that command its military forces. Unlike Rome, the order of its military resides in the hands of its civil magistrates, who were constantly replaced…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The stability of the law, the military, and financial standing of Rom kept it powerful. Rome successfully battled the Carthaginians, the Celtics(British), the Etruscans, and the…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    They also used mercenaries to fight their wars. Unlike in Rome where military service was prioritised and they used citizen soldiers. As the Carthaginian empire expanded into the regions of Sicily with the Greco-Punic Wars, war with Rome became inevitable. In 264 BC Rome had become dominant power throughout the Italian peninsula, while Carthage had established itself as the leading maritime power in the world. This date marks the…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rome and Greece had many influential impacts on the Meditation Sea, such as, impacts on society, and many other things such as trade. In Roman Society the people were divided into groups known plebeians and Patricians. .Rome used the Mediterranean Sea to trade goods to other countries. Another reason was the fact that the Mediterranean Sea was one of the main trade links used between all the different continents and regions surrounding the Roman Empire. People of the Roman Empire used it because it was a lot faster to transport good and a lot safer than land transportation. Overall, both empires have turned out to be complex and influential empires ,however Rome had a much more massive empire and much more cultural and educational impact.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although the empire had an advanced military for the most part, the Roman military had difficulty fending off the multiple invaders that were attacking at different areas of the empire. For example, Rome had to keep their military focused in Italy to fight in civil wars, leaving the border of Rome unprotected and easy to target for outside kingdoms and civilizations (“Ten Theories On The Fall Of Rome”). The barbarian invasions also had an affect on how much money and…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, indeed throughout history, Rome ultimately exhibited a readiness to adapt its military tactics and strategy to successfully confront particular challenges. The Roman military was a highly organized institution. There was a straightforward system of rank, and a number of different splitting up of the basic unit. The entire basis of Roman infantry tactics was the idea that by keeping troops in arranges, one could fight more successfully. Most military commanders of the day simply had their troops rush passionately at the enemy, relying on better numbers, better soldiers, or luck to hold the day. The Romans realized that they could not always rely on these, so they turned to strategy. Each situation was wrapped up differently, taking into account land, the type and strength of the opponent's troops, and the type and strength of the Roman's troops. The Romans also thought that the best tactic would be the one that had the most effect without exposing the troops to unnecessary risk. One of them was to cut off their opponent from his resources. Armies run on their stomachs and equipment, and both require regular supplies. Without a stable supply of food and water, an army will starve or dehydrate killing or uncomforting the troops and they would fall apart. The Roman Soldiers would attack the resources themselves. When they conquered territory, they took as much as they could. This not only gave them more food, it prevented it from falling into their opponent's hands and they would also try to cut off the transportation so the amount of supplies that could reach the enemy was severely reduced. One of the most famous tactics that the Romans used was called “siege”. Siege was a military operation in which troops surround a place and cut off all outside access to force surrender. The Romans would typically build a wall around the existing city to help control the enemy. This wall would be built to prevent the enemy from escaping. The ongoing siege would eventually…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Army

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Roman Army were always well equipped for battles. They had a short sword, and a spear. These weapons helped Roman Army to succeed because all the soldiers were trained well to use them.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ancient History

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Themistocles’s naval policy was the foundation for future superiority for the Athenians, for these reasons the Athenians depended on the sea to be a trading power. As Herodotus stats: “Athens’ future lay on the sea as a trading power”. As a result, this lead Themistocles to plan the improvement of the harbours in Athens for the trireme building programs, which will enable the Greeks to have a larger Navy consisting of triremes. During 493BC Themistocles decided to fortify the Piraeus peninsula with a strong wall, this was to secure and overlook the 3 harbours from this location. “In 483-482BC Themistocles persuaded the Athenian to pay for the building of a fleet, using the silver from the mines at Laurium”. This meant that the income generated was put directly on the constructions and development of triremes for the…

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Rise of Rome

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The military might of Rome was second to none in its prime. Victorious battle after battle did nothing but increase Rome's population of young men suited for combat, increase Rome's borders, and increase Rome's influence over its people and the surrounding people. With such great generals as Alexander the Great, Pompey the Great, and Julius Caesar Rome won many decisive battles. At its largest times, Rome controlled most of the Middle East, Asia Minor, present day Europe, and Egypt. It's is hard to state that conquering and controlling all of the surrounding territory didn't help aid in Rome's great success. But would they have been so successful militarily if they didn't have the trade routes or the technology?…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays