One of the threes that show it best was the Diary of Anne Frank. according to the play version on page 176, we can see the result of that. "The bread! He is stealing the bread!” after Mr. Van Daan got caught by me. dussel everything went out of hand. “We’re all hungry I see children getting thinner and thinner. Your own son Peter… I’ve heard him moan in his sleep, he’s so hungry. And you come in the night and steal food that should go to them...to the children." when Mrs. Frank finally decided to lets out the madness she wanted the VanDaan family to leave. Later as the tension decreases she was as happy as happy as a clam in high water. this evidence shows that sometimes it is not always easy for the two families to live together, but in happy time they could be together for eternity. People often not discuss their difference but when something like stealing food when you do not have enough to support, that could bring a war in between any family living …show more content…
Proven on page 223, wiesel states “I remember: he asked his father, “can this be true?” This is the twentieth century, not the middle ages. Who would allow such things crime to be committed? How could the world remain silent?”- things happen quick and worsen. It was as bad for a kid to compare it to the Middle ages, were savages and cannibals lived. The worst part of this the indifference of the others.Later Wiesel states “And then I explained to him how naïve we were, that the world did know and remain silent. And I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human being endure suffering and humiliation”. The Nobel prize of piece was given to him not because he help but because he was different, he cared. He wasn’t a taciturn person instead he was steadfast to its country, to the liberation of the persecuted, to the freedom of all. Despite of all the ones that loses their live, Elie didn’t think he could represent them all. All he could do was honor and remember