Preview

Did Stalin Launch The Great Terror Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1628 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Did Stalin Launch The Great Terror Essay
How far do you agree that Stalin had no choice but to launch the Great Terror to secure his position as leader of the Soviet Union?
The Great Terror was the period of ‘cleansing’ and ‘purging’ the Soviet Union from ‘impurities’. This translated to the arresting and killing of 20 million people. On one hand it would seem that Stalin had no choice but to launch the Great Terror because it was inevitable, giving the targets, the society and his personality. On the other hand you could argue that there was a choice in the matter and without it Stalin would still have maintained his position as leader of soviet Russia. When we are talking about choice there are two types. The only choice that Stalin felt he had because of his agendas and state of
…show more content…
Some would argue that his totalitarian personality shaped the purges. It is believed that Stalin had extreme paranoia. This meant that he was sickly suspicious of everyone. Everywhere he looked he would see enemies or spies, ready to betray him. This would mean that Stalin felt that he had no choice. The purges were a way to deal with the intense paranoia he was carrying around with him. He felt he had so many enemies the only way to remain as leader of the Soviet Union would be to dispose of them. He had to tend to his totalitarian personality and convince himself he was always in complete control. He used the purges as a controlling weapon; terror was the way to control people, and the way they acted. It could be concluded that it was in fact Stalin’s state of mind and his dangerously flawed personality which meant that he felt he had no choice. Alternately, putting aside Stalin’s state of mind, you could argue that Stalin was acting in the interest of the party and the revolution; he believed that his removal from leader or the reversal of his policies would be disastrous for the Soviet Union. We therefore need to look into external factors of the culture Stalin reigned

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    From the reign of Alexander the lll terror and repression has been widely used as a mean of control. Under the Tsar they were not used as much as their successors but they were used especially with Alexander lll with Russification (Okhrana), and the counter reforms also with Nicholas ll (Okhrana) with bloody Sunday. Under the leadership of Lenin repression and terror persisted with the ‘Red Terror’ campaign (war communism) which consisted of mass arrests and executions ordered by the Bolshevik government and implemented by the Cheka. This idea of control through repression and terror continued in Russia under the leadership of Josef Stalin (OGPU, NKVD, NKGB, MGB). After the death of Stalin, Khrushchev implemented a period of ‘de-Stalinisation’ (KGB) with the aim of ridding the state of its secretive and repressive nature to open up and make allies with the west which was the first time since Alexander ll.…

    • 3481 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler commands the Germans to invade the Soviet Union in 1941 – this was Hitler’s greatest mistake, but was luck on the Soviets side or was it all just the leader Stalin’s good tactics and leadership? Even though Stalin was a mass murderer and a ruthless leader, he did one thing right. After the Soviets were losing battle after battle Stalin let his commanders fight the war as they knew it, did not interfere with their plan and stuck to his word, unlike Hitler did. Stalin let his commanders be true commanders and did not use them as puppets or for his own use. He was a true leader stuck to his word which is why I think the he was successful at leading his nation to victory. As the war continued the number of errors that Stalin was making got…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joseph Stalin Dbq Analysis

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Joseph Stalin established a modern totalitarian government in Soviet Russia. He is known as the “Man of Steel”. A totalitarianism is a type of government that takes total, centralized, state control over every aspect of public and private life of their people. His rule had changed the people of his empire in numerous ways. Stalin had total control over economic needs. According to document 6 “By 1940 Russia produced more pig iron than Germany, and far more than Britain or France. Numbers of cattle grew in the 1920s, but fell increasingly during the collectivization of agriculture after 1929, and by 1940 hardly exceeded the figure for 1920. Since 1940 the industrial development of the Soviet Union has been impressive, but agricultural production has continued to be plumiding”. The document illustrates how pig iron had significantly increased as a result of the “Five Year Plan”, however heavy industry led to expense of food supplies. This would cause limited production of consumer goods. It caused a step back because of the severe shortages of housing, food, clothing as well as other necessary goods. The Five Year Plan didn’t help much to excel their economic as Stalin hoped, it impacted by creating famine. Stalin rising to power promised an economic boom for Russia however, in that process many people suffered and died of starvation. According to document 5, “The purge began its last,…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another weakness of Stalin’s leadership, thus supporting the argument is that many of the most successful officers were purged under Stalin’s orders. This can mainly be attributed to Stalin’s paranoid personality; he was afraid of competition for leadership from the higher ranked officers and it was because of this he gave out the orders for them to be purged. This would support the argument that victory was in spite of Stalin as the Soviet government would have been much stronger had Stalin not ordered the officers to be purged. this is a particularly important factor contributing to the validity argument as it…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To conclude, it is quite clear that Stalins theories differed greatly from that of Marx. It is also clear, however, to see that Stalins…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Josephe Stalin DBQ

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the most controversial leaders in world history was Joseph Stalin. He transformed the Soviet Union into a modern superpower between the years of 1928 and 1941. His ruling could be characterized as rapid industrialization, collectivized agriculture, great purges, and the extermination of opposition. Stalin’s rule could be proven both positively and negatively towards Russia. He powered the Russians military force but his methods negatively affected Russians.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stalin and Purges

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The aim of this investigation is to assess how the purges of 1934-38 helped Stalin preserve his power in the Soviet Union. In order to evaluate this, the investigation assesses Stalin’s role in relation to the purges, as well as their purpose. An analysis of this should indicate the extent to which the purges were successful, and their contribution to Stalin’s power. In the section entitled Evaluation of Sources, two sources used for this investigation (The Great Terror: A Reassessment, and Origins of the great purges: the Soviet Communist Party reconsidered, 1933-1938) are evaluated according to their values, limitations, origins, and purposes.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It transformed the USSR from a one party state to a totalitarian dictatorship. Purging was the removal of unwanted members from the communist party. Initially, Stalin’s purges were directed against members of the Communist Party. He decided to eliminate all those who might present a threat to his power. To begin with party purges were not as violent or as deadly as they later became. The procedure was to oblige members to hand in their party cards for checking, at which point any suspect would not have their cards returned to them. This meant the individual and their family lost their privileges in regards to employment, housing and food. The purges extended beyond those former leaders who had fallen out with Stalin, the purges now included army personnel and middle ranking officers of the party. Stalin was suspicious and fearful of everyone he encouraged party members to inform on ‘enemies of the people’. 800 000 party members were expelled during 1933 and a further 340 000 in 1934. By the end of 1933 there were already about two million people in prison, in forced labour camps and deportation camps. Stalin implemented show trails as a way of creating public awareness of the consequences of being untrustworthy. The first of these show trials was in 1936 which involved Zinoviev, Kamenev and fourteen others. They were accused of taking part in a conspiracy planned by Trotsky which was to overthrow the government. All involved were found guilty and shot. Stalin instructed many more purges during his time in power which all had an impact on the USSR. The purges impacted on the USSR in a way which created a suspicious and frightened atmosphere. The leader of the USSR was paranoid and therefore was in no state of mind to be directing such a vast nation. Almost every family in the USSR suffered the loss of at least one of its members as a victim of…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stalin was paranoid about people trying to not conform and try to rebel against him. 93 out of 139 Central Committee members were killed and 81 of 103 generals and admirals were executed. The secret police in Russia were strong believers of Stalinism and encouraged people to inform on one another. Around 750,000 people were killed as a result of Stalin’s paranoia. In fact, a lot of the deaths during his rule were because he had a political competitor killed or citizens were killed due to harsh laws.…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin - History

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are many reasons that suggest Stalin’s victory in the power struggle was because his popular policies. For example Stalin’s popular policy of Socialism in one country put the needs of the USSR first, this was particularly popular because the conditions for the majority of the Russian people was unthinkable as extreme poverty was common for the average Russian in the the early 20th Century. It was a lot more popular than Trotsky's idea of World revolution, which would have seen many of the resources owned by the USSR sent abroad to try spread the Communist revolution abroad in other countries. Stalin developed his idea in Socialism in one Country because he did not like Trotsky. Stalin recognised that Trotsky’s policy was over optimistic and unpopular. The First World War and the civil war had destroyed the Russian economy and Stalin’s policy showed faith in the soviet people, almost portraying that Stalin believed in the Russian people. Stalin portrayed the Worldwide revolution as a policy that put the needs of other countries before those of the Russian people. Trostsky’s Jewish background marked him as a disloyal outsider among many party members anyway, and his international policy only seemed to confirm that he was not loyal to the people of Russia.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through the show trials and ‘The Terror’, Stalin shaped the Communist Party and Soviet society to a significant extent from 1934 to 1941 through the use of fear and control to assume total power with no opposition. The Great Terror aimed to target individuals who undermined Stalin’s regime, and was catalysed by the assassination of Sergei Kirov, a Bolshevik revolutionary working below Stalin who would often challenge him. Through the use of political purges, Stalin shaped the Communist party to a significant extent, eliminating and denouncing any possible rivals while also creating fear within his government. Similarly, through the show trials and the purges, Stalin significantly restructured society, creating a need for obedience through the use of terror within soviet society. However, Stalin…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is where his use of propaganda came in. What is propaganda? You can think of it as information that is spread for the purpose of promoting some cause. If you look at Document Ten, you can see how he was portrayed by many different artists. Well, the artists really didn’t have a choice but to portray him in a positive way. This is where you can finally see the “evil” side of Joseph Stalin. He used force to get what he wanted and many people didn’t see it. Eventually, his Five Year Plans backfired and really sent the peasants into an even deeper level of poverty. Not only did he send some of the peasants into even more poverty that they were already in, he even killed some of them or put them in work camps and starved them to death. (Document Seven). He wasn’t going to let anybody stand in his way and if they tried, he would kill them off just like…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin is even controlling religion, which is something that should never be compromised. In 1936, the Soviet Constitution promised freedom of religious expression for all faiths in the Soviet Union. But really in 1932, Stalin produced a five-year plan to eradicate religion, the Soviet Communist Party thought of religion as a threat and tried everything they possibly could in order to get rid of…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin's Great Terror

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    His followers loved him so much and were so loyal they would do anything for him, like “If it was necessary to cut you to pieces, [stalin's people] cut you to pieces.” He was very involved with the killing, and if he wasn’t involved he planned it, and watched. If Stalin didn’t kill you he would send you to a gulag. A gulag was labour camp where Stalin would send his enemies. Was it better to live and be sent to a gulag? Or be tortured and die? He would do anything to make sure anyone unloyal to him, a person able to lead, or anyone he disliked would disappear. If he didn’t kill them he might have left them to physically and mentally scarred they couldn’t even imagine disliking Stalin. This was one of the worst events in history, and it went unnoticed by Russia’s own people as it went down.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays