Preview

Did The Appellants Owe A Duty Of Care

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
716 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Did The Appellants Owe A Duty Of Care
Did the appellants owe a duty of care towards the deceased? If the appellants did owe a duty, how did they both breach that duty. In this case the appellants argued that to establish a case of manslaughter by negligence it must be proved by the prosecution that they duty of care has to exist between the parties. As Stone agreed to take Fanny into his home, both Stone and Dobinson assumed a duty of care to take care of her. They did not pursue this duty leading to Fanny’s health severely deteriorating resulting in her death. The appellants were responsible for her death as they took Fanny into their home and provided a room. Fanny was not just a person off the street but a blood relative to Stone, Stones sister. Stone was obliged to take care …show more content…
The appellants claimed they tried to get medical help but were unsuccessful. Detective inspector Ashton interviewed Dobinson on the 2nd of August, 1975, where Dobinson claimed “I asked him (ted) to meet a doctor but because she was not on his panel the doctor wouldn’t come”. If Fanny received medical attention she was likely to survive, but the appellants had not pursued any furthermore help to try get medical attention. When Stone was asked about calling an ambulance for Fanny her replied “I did not think that”. (Archive, 1976) (Westlaw-UK, …show more content…
Both defendants must have seen a risk of harm, serious harm or death. The prosecution must provide evidence showing that both Stone and Dobinson were reckless towards the deceased. Although they did provide a duty of care towards Fanny their actions were not reckless. Lord Hewart states in Rex v Bateman [1925] 19 Cr. App. R.8 that “Reckless suggests an indifference to risk whereas the accused may have appreciated the risk and intended to avoid it and get shown such a high degree of negligence in the means adopted to avoid the risk would justify conviction”. However recklessness is in fact present as the appellants took the risk to provide Fanny with a room providing a duty of care and appreciated this

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Law 531 Case 5.1

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rules: The case was adjudicated on the basis of negligence law. Negligence is “the omission to do something which a reasonable man would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do.” Among others, negligence law takes into consideration: duty of care, breach of duty of care, injuries caused by defendant’s negligent act(s), and the likes. (Cheeseman, 2013). A particular negligence law considered during this case was negligence per se.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Petitioner V Negligence Case

    • 4763 Words
    • 20 Pages

    1 of 3 DOCUMENTS M.A. MORTENSON COMPANY, INC., Petitioner, v. TIMBERLINE SOFTWARE CORPORATION and SOFTWORKS DATA SYSTEMS, INC., Respondents. No. 67796--4 SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON 140 Wn.2d 568; 998 P.2d 305; 2000 Wash. LEXIS 287; CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P15,893; 41 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 357 October 26, 1999, Oral Argument Date May 4, 2000, Filed PRIOR HISTORY: [***1] Appeal from Superior Court, King County. 95--2--31991--2. Honorable Phillip Hubbard, Judge. DISPOSITION: Court of Appeals affirmed, upholding trial court's order of summary judgment of dismissal and denial of motions to vacate and amend. LexisNexis(R) Headnotes COUNSEL: For Petitioner: Bradley L. Powell, Oles Morrison Rinker & Baker Llp, Seattle, WA, Catherine…

    • 4763 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A2 OCR Law - Intention

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages

    R v. G and another [2003], was a criminal law case on appeal concerning recklessness. It upheld a subjective test for recklessness and that a defendant must have subjectively appreciated a risk in the circumstances known to him but continued anyway to be worthy of blame.…

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Canadian Business and the Law, duty of care is an element of the tort of negligence and it is defined as the responsibility owed to avoid careless that causes harm to others. Also, it necessarily need to test in terms of two types factors such as foreseeability and proximity: legal neighbour because a plaintiff must state and clarify the two factors in order to successfully bring a claim in negligence for compensation for an injury.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2105

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Law: Section 23 (contributory negligence apply s9 and s11 to the plaintiff’s conduct) Ingram v Britten…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hammurabi Research Paper

    • 3478 Words
    • 14 Pages

    is committed negligently, the courts must prove that there was a duty of care towards another…

    • 3478 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Respondents were charged with causing their son 's death by criminal negligence in that they denied him the necessaries of life without lawful excuse and thereby committed manslaughter. They raised the defence of an honest although mistaken belief in the existence of a circumstance which would render their conduct non-culpable. Respondents were convicted of manslaughter and appealed to the Court of Appeal which set aside the convictions and directed new trials. This appeal was taken by leave.…

    • 15694 Words
    • 63 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bibliography: Goodey, J and Silver, K (2012) Starting with law, Milton Keynes, The open university.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    o Court held that no causation existed as act performed by the accused may not have caused victim’s death…

    • 4696 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case brings to light, issues of duty and care associated with liability of providing negligent mis-statement. To establish whether there was indeed a duty of care or not, 3 criteria must be satisfied. These are:…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This problem concerns clinical negligence by omission for failing to diagnose Jane for meningitis and encephalitis. For the hospital to be held vicariously liable for the actions of its doctors, Jane must prove misdiagnosis was carried out negligently and directly caused the injury. Lord Bingham said, ‘For the purposes of analysis, and for the purpose of pleading, proving and resolving the claim, lawyers find it convenient to break the claim into its constituent elements: the duty, the breach, the damage and the causal connection between the breach and the damage.’ The harm arose from both a delayed diagnosis of Jane by Shakir and the Senior House Officer’s (SHO) partial diagnosis of meningitis – prescribing an antibiotic that made her situation…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    North Carolina Law of Torts

    • 3596 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Chapter 1 Duty 1.10 Duty 1.20 Misfeasance and Nonfeasance [1] Special Applications of the Misfeasance Rule [a] Negligent Entrustment of Chattel [b] “Negligent Entrustment” and Alcohol [c] Spoliation of Evidence Chapter 2 Duty Despite Nonfeasance: The Special Relationship Exceptions 2.10 Duty Despite Nonfeasance 2.20 Duty Because of a Special Relationship between the Plaintiff and the Defendant 2.30 Duty to Control Another for the Benefit of the Plaintiff Chapter 3 No Duty Despite Misfeasance: Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress and Negligent Infliction of Pure Economic Harm 3.10 No Duty Despite Misfeasance 3.20 Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress [1] The Early Cases [2] Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics and Its Progeny [3] Pre-Impact Fear of Dying [4] Fear of Contracting Medical Condition 3.30 Negligent Infliction of Pure Economic Harm Chapter 4 No Duty Because of the Defendant’s Status: Immunities 4.10 Recovery for Torts…

    • 3596 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Duty of Care

    • 33459 Words
    • 134 Pages

    Duty of Care General: Duty is the primary control device which allows the courts to keep liability for negligence within what they regard as acceptable limits and the controversies which have centered around the criteria for the exercise of a duty reflect differences of opinion as to the proper ambit of liability for negligence. Before Donoghue v Stevenson, there was no liability for negligence in a case where there is no special relationship between parties. Because in Case of Assault or Battery or Defamation where someone has some certain restrictions that the D must not do by the law. But in a case of Pure negligence it was uncertain, so the court used to impose duties only where D & C had some kind of relations such as relation with a Doctor to his patient or a Lawyer to his client and so on. In this sense the Setevenson case was unique because in that case X bought Beer for his friend from a Shop and while drinking that his friend Y found that there was a snail and Y became seriously ill. The question to the court was as there was no relation existed between the Manufacturer and Y how they could impose a duty in such a situation. Furthermore because of the principle of Privity Y could not sue the Shop hence she had no contractual relations with the shop. However the House of Lords by majority discovered that there was a duty. And how it worked we come know form the dicta of Lord Atkin. His Lordship stated that, manufacturers has a duty because Y was neighbor by law of the manufacturer, and everyone has duty by law toward their neighbors not to harm them. Court said one must not injured…

    • 33459 Words
    • 134 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Law Criminal Courts

    • 2526 Words
    • 11 Pages

    It has been shown, therefore that Jonas attacker, depending on the extent of his crime could face imprisonment from six months up to life, under the Offence Against the Persons Act (1861).The Act is 152 years old, the non Fatal offences contained within it use archaic language and words of which modern understanding of them has changed since it was passed, such as assault and battery. The structure of the offences can also be criticised. There is no statutory definition of assault or battery and there are no clear boundaries between the offences which Jonas attacker could have committed. Similarly there is no clear boundary between ABH and GBH it is for the jury to decide what amounts to really serious harm and different juries will differ in their opinions. Non-fatal offences is an area of the law that has attracted much criticism and it is unanimously accepted that it is in need of reform. This could avoid absurd decisions within the courtroom, endless appeals and unjustified sentencing. In order for both Jonas and his attacker to have a fair trail, changes are necessary.…

    • 2526 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The respondent’s arguments on appeal were that the trial judge correctly found that it had not breached its duty of care, and if it had breached that duty, the appellant was 100% liable for contributory negligence. This argument gave rise to the second issue: if the respondent breached its duty of care, is the appellant guilty of contributory negligence, and to what extent?…

    • 2294 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays