Did Wilson Mutambara Act Wrongly
Discussion Questions (Case 10.4)-Chapter10 1. Did Wilson Mutambara act wrongly? Explain why or why not. Assess each of the arguments he gives in his own defense. What other courses of action were open to him? What would you have done in his place?
The Company provides the allowance both to employee live areas that are safe and convenient and that they live in a style that is appropriate to the company¶s image. However, Wilson Mutambara was choosing use the allowance $2000 for other purpose and intentionally misrepresented his use of that allowance so that he could continue but he still stay in Old Town. According to this action, Mutambara was act wrongly because he not following the obligations of company. When Wilson accepts employment, …show more content…
Should Wilson be ordered to move out of Old Town and into more appropriate housing? Should he be terminated for having falsified his housing receipts? If not, should he be punished in some other way?
Barbara Weston is loyalty to the company and obligated to take the company¶s best interest into consideration. It is imperative that she consider the harm that might have accrued to NewCom as a result of the actions that Mutambara has performed. The money allocated to him was used wrongfully, but Weston also considering the reasons that Mutambara is morally acceptance because he saves every penny to pay school fees for eight nieces and nephews.
Wilson should be ordered to move out of Old Town and into more appropriate housing because he needs to protect himself live in safe and convenient place and protect company¶s image following the obligation to the company. There are Mutambara can safety in every time he go home and locations convenient to workplace are likely more dependable in that workplace.
He should not be terminated for having falsified his housing receipts. Barbara Weston can give a private condemn to Mutambara that is telling him and explaining what wrongs he had
The Company provides the allowance both to employee live areas that are safe and convenient and that they live in a style that is appropriate to the company¶s image. However, Wilson Mutambara was choosing use the allowance $2000 for other purpose and intentionally misrepresented his use of that allowance so that he could continue but he still stay in Old Town. According to this action, Mutambara was act wrongly because he not following the obligations of company. When Wilson accepts employment, …show more content…
Should Wilson be ordered to move out of Old Town and into more appropriate housing? Should he be terminated for having falsified his housing receipts? If not, should he be punished in some other way?
Barbara Weston is loyalty to the company and obligated to take the company¶s best interest into consideration. It is imperative that she consider the harm that might have accrued to NewCom as a result of the actions that Mutambara has performed. The money allocated to him was used wrongfully, but Weston also considering the reasons that Mutambara is morally acceptance because he saves every penny to pay school fees for eight nieces and nephews.
Wilson should be ordered to move out of Old Town and into more appropriate housing because he needs to protect himself live in safe and convenient place and protect company¶s image following the obligation to the company. There are Mutambara can safety in every time he go home and locations convenient to workplace are likely more dependable in that workplace.
He should not be terminated for having falsified his housing receipts. Barbara Weston can give a private condemn to Mutambara that is telling him and explaining what wrongs he had