A comprehensive analysis of the cases of Bartolomé Sánchez in Mad for God and Diego Daz in Inquisitorial Inquiries reveals that both defendants employed artful tactics that aligned with their understanding of the Inquisition's mechanisms to mount a robust defense against the charges leveled against them. However, while Sánchez relied heavily on religious fervor and the depiction of martyrdom, Daz adeptly navigated the system through strategic maneuvering and flexibility, thereby exemplifying divergent approaches to survival within the complex labyrinth of the Inquisition. The Spanish Inquisition is a well-known symbol of religious …show more content…
Daz demonstrated a remarkable understanding of the intricacies of the Inquisition, which was reflected in his adept maneuvering of the complex procedures involved. He was acutely aware of the significance of presenting statements that would satisfy the expectations of the inquisitors, and therefore, he meticulously crafted his responses with utmost care to avoid any incriminating evidence. Unlike Sánchez, who staunchly adhered to his beliefs, Daz adopted a more strategic approach, skillfully tailoring his testimonies to align with the evolving demands and suspicions of his interrogators. Daz demonstrated exceptional expertise in manipulating the Inquisition's investigative processes. Instead of completely confessing his alleged transgressions, he strategically used the tactic of providing partial admissions, selectively revealing certain aspects of his involvement in illicit activities. This approach allowed him to appear cooperative while simultaneously concealing his deeper involvement in any wrongdoing. Moreover, Daz skillfully implicated others, using their involvement to divert attention from himself and create distractions within the proceedings. His proficiency in deflecting