Difference Between Normal And Normal Science

Behavioural science is different from normal science but if we analyses to these two sciences in the modern society the application will be similar in some point of view. If we exclude one from another barrier will be seen in functioning of social world. Behavioural science and normal science both are correlated to each other. So the assumption of human being can and ought to be studies use natural science method and for understand of human being. According to behavioural science it is the systematic analysed and inquiry of human and animal’s behaviour by control and naturalistic observation and the discipline scientific experiment. It attempts to the legitimate, objective conclusions by the formulation and observation. Behavioural sciences
The normal science is attempt the force nature into a performed and rigid box that the paradigm provides and the aim to stay within box. So mature science is consist most of the time. In science the paradigm provide a means for identifying puzzles and likely solution normal sciences is puzzles and solving specifically puzzles about the nature of the world. Kuhn used puzzle solving his demarcation creation between science and non-science. He told scientists do not seek the refute the paradigm the fact that a paradigm exist means it has proven itself successful. The normal science serves a function it is useful for a scientist to be committed to the paradigm, precisely because their very stubbornness will in time reveal the genuine weakness of the
Then in Paradigm stage is conversion and accept the normal science.at the last stage there are crises are identify. The crisis creates a growing sense that the paradigm has ceased to function adequately in the exploration of nature. Crises are itself doing not mean scientists abandon their paradigm. If we have conceptual tools we would be practises science which is attack to problem. The paradigm derived how to solve problem and when they have solve it.
According to Kuhn the methodological stereotypes of falsification by direct comparison with nature does not exist in actual sciences. The decision is reject one paradigm is a ways simultaneously the decision to accept another. So scientist reject core theory only if they have an alternative is also having an interesting and insufficiently tested conjugate about scientific practise. The crises finally encourages and development of different paradigm.
Manifestation of normal science in the behavioural sciences on health