Difference Between Spencer And Social Darwinism

Social Darwinism is a subsection Charles Darwin’s study of the evolutionary process that explains natural selection between plants and animals. The major difference is that when Herbert Spencer originated Social Darwinism, he used it as a justification for political conservatism, imperialism, and racism and to discourage intervention and reform. Employing the “survival of the fittest” concept, Spencer expanded on Darwin’s teachings by linking them to human sociology and the human mind. The people exposed to the views of Social Darwinism had their ideas on ideologies such as racism radically changed. There was suddenly no more thought of equality, and only the thought process of why certain people are better than others. Through this, Herbert Spencer and Social Darwinists were the key factors in changing the people perspective on
The women in particular were extremely affected in a negative way. The only difference between this and all other things taught about to other people was that the assumption that women are inferior to men was described by Charles Darwin himself. Darwinists classified them as two distinct species—males as Homo frontalis and females s Homo parietalis. He was amazed at the fact that two different types of people could be both humans. This was believed because men, who were built in order to fight and hunt to survive, only allowed to string to come back home alive and reproduce whereas women stayed home all day allowing all weak women to survive and reproduce, not letting them evolve. He also added the idea that their brains were smaller and more primitive and childlike. Darwin yet again here promotes an ism that is against a certain group of people or culture. In this case he promotes an influenced many people around him explaining the reasoning behind the sexism in biblical tecta and everyday