Difference in Us Gaap and International Accounting
IS IFRS a better Accounting Standard than US GAAP for achieving good financial reports?
This research paper delivers an analysis of determining whether the International Financial Reporting Standards, hereafter known as IFRS, is a better reporting standard than the US Generally Accepted Accounting Principle (GAAP). Financial Statements have to provide high quality financial reporting information with regards to economic entities, primarily financial in nature, which are useful for economic decision making (FASB, 1999; IASB, 2008). International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) have been extremely involved in making IFRS the international Accounting Standard. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has been working on evaluating the implications of incorporating IFRS into the US financial reporting system, currently known as US GAAP. More than one hundred countries have moved to IFRS reporting, or have decided to require the use of these standards in the near future. (SEC,[2007]). Financial reports are a combination of four different key statements. They are balance sheets, income statements, cash flow statements and the statements of shareholders equity. Currently, the FASB is the highest authority in establishing generally accepted accounting for public and private companies in the United States. Financial reports are a necessary tool used by current and prospective investors to see how a company function and stands financially. It is also used to analyze and assess a company’s potential areas of growth as well as its areas of weakness. US GAAP has many guidelines and rules to follow whereas IFRS is more based on basic principle. Comparing the US Generally Accepted Accounting Principle (GAAP) and IFRS might help to understand which standards will better serve the Goal of achieving good financial reports. Both IFRS and US GAAP have many rules in common and are significantly similar due to the conjunction
This research paper delivers an analysis of determining whether the International Financial Reporting Standards, hereafter known as IFRS, is a better reporting standard than the US Generally Accepted Accounting Principle (GAAP). Financial Statements have to provide high quality financial reporting information with regards to economic entities, primarily financial in nature, which are useful for economic decision making (FASB, 1999; IASB, 2008). International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) have been extremely involved in making IFRS the international Accounting Standard. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has been working on evaluating the implications of incorporating IFRS into the US financial reporting system, currently known as US GAAP. More than one hundred countries have moved to IFRS reporting, or have decided to require the use of these standards in the near future. (SEC,[2007]). Financial reports are a combination of four different key statements. They are balance sheets, income statements, cash flow statements and the statements of shareholders equity. Currently, the FASB is the highest authority in establishing generally accepted accounting for public and private companies in the United States. Financial reports are a necessary tool used by current and prospective investors to see how a company function and stands financially. It is also used to analyze and assess a company’s potential areas of growth as well as its areas of weakness. US GAAP has many guidelines and rules to follow whereas IFRS is more based on basic principle. Comparing the US Generally Accepted Accounting Principle (GAAP) and IFRS might help to understand which standards will better serve the Goal of achieving good financial reports. Both IFRS and US GAAP have many rules in common and are significantly similar due to the conjunction
Bibliography: Ball, R., A Robin, and Wu, 2003, Incentives Versus Standards: Properties of Accounting Income in four East Asian Countries, Journal of Accounting and Economics36, 235-270. Ball, R., 2001, Infrastructure Requirements of an Economically Efficient System of Public Fianncial Reporting and Disclosure, in Brooking- Wharton papers on Financial Services, R.Litan, And T. Herring (eds), Brooking Insitution Press, Washington, 127-169. Ball, R., Shivakumar, 2005, Earning quality in U.K Private Firms, Journal of Accounting and Economics 39, 83-128 Biddle, G, G Hilary and R Bohusova, Hana, and Patrick Svoboda. "IFRS AND US GAAP CONVERGENCE IN AREA OF MERGER AND ACQUISITION." Economics & Management 14.1822-6515 (2009): 20-27. Print. Diamond, D and R, Verrecchia, 1991, Disclosure, liquidity and the cost of capital, journal of finance 46, 1325-1359. Ding, Y., & Su, X. (2008). Implementation of IFRS in a regulated market. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27, 474- 479. Ernst & Young, 2007b, IFRS- An option for U.S Issuer?, Hot Topic, Professional Practice Group, Ernst & young LLP. Ernst & Young, DEC 2011, US GAAP versus IFRS: The Basic, Ernst &Young LLP. FASB (1999). International standard setting: a vision for the future. Norwalk Ferrari, Mascia, Francesco Momente, and Francesco Reggiani Rodrigo Verdi, et al. "Mandatory IFRS Reporting Around The World: Early Evidence On The Economic Consequences." Journal Of Accounting Research 46.5 (2008): 1085-1142. Business Source Premier. Web. 28 Sept. 2012. Soderstrom, N.S., & Sun, K.J. (2007). IFRS adoption and accounting quality: A review. European Accounting Review, 16, 675-702. Verrechia, R., 2001, Essay on Disclosure, Journal of Accounting and Economics 32, 91-180.