Preview

Difference of Athens and Han China

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
254 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Difference of Athens and Han China
To the question how great were the differences of classical Athens and Han china? My interpretation is that there was a huge difference in these two empires. Like there form of government, art, geography, and population.
In classical Greece (9th–6th centuries BCE) the form of government is a democracy which is ‘administration is in the hands of, not of a few, but of the whole people’ (Pericles). Where as in Han china (206 BCE – 220 CE) the form of government is a bureaucracy which is a body of non-elective government officials. ‘The emperor appointed governors to each district for his domain’.
Also in classical Greece the art was different than Han china. In Han china the art was more focused on nature, and how nature is more important, and how we should be in harmony with nature. ‘Each separate being in the universe returns to the common source. Returning to the source is serenity.’(Lao-tzu ) where as in classical Greece the art was more focused on the ideal man. ‘The world is full of wonders but nothing is more wonderful than man.’(Sophocles).
The geography was also completely different. In classical Greece the area was surrounded by water and the empire was smaller than the Han Empire . And the population was different where classical Greece had a total population 315,000 people. Han china had a total population 65,000,000 people.
These are the reason that are why there was a huge difference in classical Greece and Han

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Han China and Imperial Rome had some Similarities. Both Han China and Imperial Rome had very large empires that it was difficult to manage their boarders and often faced threats. Both Empires were patriarchal societies and kept women in low status with no say in political affairs. Both Han China and Imperial Rome were ruled by one centralized ruler. Both empires had standardized coins to promote…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were different politically. The Roman Empire was founded on imported agriculture and didn’t have a set bureaucracy. While the emperor of Rome appointed some advisors the government lacked many institutions, such as a planned budget. Apart from the emperor and senate the Romans didn’t have other levels of government; because of this the farther reaches of the Roman Empire had more autonomy. The Han was founded on strict legalism and had a well organized bureaucracy. Even though the emperor had absolute power, institutions such as the Three Councilors of State and Nine…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire both had a great influence not only on its people but the world as a whole. The two had similar and different methods of political control. Both ruled their people under a bureaucracy, they had civil servants to maintain their large empires, and their foundations were made of great and strong rulers. Aside from the similarities they also had several differences. Take China for example, they focused more on Confucianism and they had a Mandate of Heaven. Rome on the other hand used entertainment to distract and control the masses of its population.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han China Dbq Analysis

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Athens and Han China were two great civilizations that were successful. Both Athens and Han China had different philosophers that influenced their civilization. Though Athens and Han China were almost five-hundred years and a continent apart, they both made similar successful communities with their citizens, government, geography, and lifestyle.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Han China and Imperial Rome are compared, one can find both similarities and differences in terms of techniques of imperial administration. A similarity would be that both are bureaucracies. However, both are also different. One major difference is that Han China had the civil service exams. They also differed because Han China had a much greater emphasis on religion than the Romans. These differences led to very different futures for the two empires, both of which were among the strongest in the world at the time.…

    • 568 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Rome and Han China are both well recognized empires, known as strong and fairly successful. Although the empires had some differences they also had similarities in their methods of political control. Similarities between these empires include the belief that leaders had connections to God, religious tolerance, and public works provided to citizens. Along with the similarities in political control the differences include Rome having a democracy while China had a centralized bureaucracy, Rome had lesser domestic repercussions while China had harsh punishments, and Rome offered assimilation to become a citizen while China did not need to offer assimilation because it conquered states that were already chinese.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some similarities of imperial administration in Imperial Rome and Han China include the general idea of equality, living under one ruler who gives the people some control, and the roles of families. Both empires believed in generalization of the people. Yes, they had one ruler, but everyone else underneath the ruler was made equal. Both Imperial Rome and Han China are controlled under one central leader.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han Chinese were more diplomatic and wanted to avoid conflict as much as possible. There mindset was to win battles without fighting. Instead of using military and legions to defend their borders. They used walls and diplomacy to get other enemies away from attacking their borders. The romans though were a very attack mentality kind of military. They were very organized and had a lot of legions. They would use the citizens to sign up for the military. This was also a way to keep political control by making them sign up for the military. They used the legions and the military to defend their borders. A similarity though is that they both used roads and waterways for military access and trade routes. They could move the military easier from place to place. They could collect taxes and control trade. And also they could govern more effectively with use of messengers due to the…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Vs Han

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty had a lot in common, but they also have many differences. For instance, the Roman Empire relied heavily on slave (mostly prisoners of war) labor, but the Han Dynasty relied greatly on free peasant labor. Although both the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty had a well organized bureaucracy, the Han Dynasty had bureaucracy based upon Confucian ideology. Also the Han Dynasty did not have paved roads, where as the Roman Empire constructed many paved roads (which was because the romans discovered concrete).…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq- Han China and Greece

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After viewing the documents, it is clear that Classical Athens and Han China are very different politically. Athens focused on the rights of the individual whereas Han China preferred dominance that used an imperialist approach. However, the reason for this difference in political beliefs can be based on the difference of population. It is easier to be a democracy with a smaller population than a larger one. That said it is also easier to rule many people with a select elite. Another difference is that their social aspects are opposites. Athenians believed that everyone should obey the laws of society and turn in those who break them. Han china thought that it is better to obey the rules but should always prefer family over government. Despite many differences, both Classical Athens and Han China thought there should be class distinctions between poor and the wealthy, few and many, free people and slaves.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, they both began to grow rapidly and out of control towards the end of their times because they could not support all of the people that were moving inside their walls. This must have been a hard time for them because they were doing to well until the time that because they were growing so rapidly they could not support all of their newfound citizens. Another similarity economically is that they both traded with other societies and because of this many things were passed on such as plagues. One of the reasons they both fell was because of plagues, the Romans had the Black plague while the Han had the Antonine plague. The last reason that they both fell was how they handled agriculture. On one hand the Han always had the promise of new land to peasants is they served in the war but after a while they started to run out of land that they would do and that made people very upset. These examples of defeat are helpful for us to know because enow we can use them and realize that with all of our new ideas and technology we don’t have to make the same mistakes that many ancient societies did that eventually lead to their…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constantine I and Rome

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The differences between Classical Athens and Han China were major and distinctive. The background information, government, values of the individual, and art of each society show how differently each empire developed.…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Han and Rome

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Han China and Roman empires were similar and different in many ways. The Rome and Han had multiple characteristics in common such as a (s1) patriarchal society, in which women were inferior to men, (s2) upper level social classes, and (s3) both containing a large gap between the rich and poor. However, these dynasties also contrasted in many areas. For example, the (d1) Romans had many slaves, which were used for agriculture and business production, while the Han did not. These empires also had (d2) varying ways in which their household was run, such as pater familias and filial piety, as well as the (d3) role of women was different among the two empires.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Technology Dbq

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although both the Han and Roman Empire were advanced one was more complex than the other. Both the Han China and the Roman Empire were highly sophisticated and contemporary in the evolution of their technology. Both Empires had very efficient, formulated and solid mechanized skills, yet the Romans cherished their technology only for its beauty, elegance and aesthetics. whereas the Hans valued their technology for its advantages and uses. This explains how these two, classical civilizations had very different perspectives towards technology.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical China and India had differences in territorial governing as well as religious freedom, but compared with how they expanded their territory. China's main focus was political and army related, while India specifically focused on their primary religions. Both civilizations differed with how they ruled and lived, but they both experienced their own set of political…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays