during the Great Leap Forward China was paying their workers for how hard they worked. This causes a lot more production than beatings can. Also, the communes weren’t just agriculturally based, they also contained elements of industrialization. In addition, there were a wider variety of jobs on the communes because they had things like schools, nurseries and elderly homes. Although Russia didn’t have anything like this, there were a few State Farms, which were based off of hourly wage. This still didn’t give an impetus for the workers to exhaust themselves in the fields. What happened then was the leaders decided to take the encouragement into their own hands by beating it into the workers. The constant threat of beatings was what made the workers stay on task. The act of beating would not have been as prominent in China due to the inducement of the increased pay for working harder than your neighbors.
during the Great Leap Forward China was paying their workers for how hard they worked. This causes a lot more production than beatings can. Also, the communes weren’t just agriculturally based, they also contained elements of industrialization. In addition, there were a wider variety of jobs on the communes because they had things like schools, nurseries and elderly homes. Although Russia didn’t have anything like this, there were a few State Farms, which were based off of hourly wage. This still didn’t give an impetus for the workers to exhaust themselves in the fields. What happened then was the leaders decided to take the encouragement into their own hands by beating it into the workers. The constant threat of beatings was what made the workers stay on task. The act of beating would not have been as prominent in China due to the inducement of the increased pay for working harder than your neighbors.