Preview

differences between massachusetts and virginia 1607 and 1750

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
412 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
differences between massachusetts and virginia 1607 and 1750
Both the economics and politics greatly differed between Massachusetts and Virginia between 1607 and 1750. The differences in the percentage of classes were unbelievably large and their entire economic structure differed from each other. Virginia had more risky culture and economics where-as Massachusetts had a more stable economy. The economy of Virginia was based solely on the production of tobacco. The plantation owners had to buy slaves to work the fields so the slave trade industry in Virginia was also a huge factor. The plantation owners were in the very rich, elite category and pretty much ran the politics. Virginia had a ridiculously small middle class and they barely had any say in the elections. The poor classes of Virginia were about 80%of the population and were not even allowed to vote. This made the state/colony of Virginia a very un-democratic and un-representative. There was very little cash flow in Virginia because the elite plantation owners flaunted their wealth as a display of power. This was necessary because this display of power kept the slaves and poor people of the community from revolting. The economy of Virginia was very fragile and brittle. All it would have taken was one drought or one bad tobacco year and Virginia would have been severely hurt economically. The Northern colonies, especially Massachusetts, were much more stable. There was a larger middle class of 65% and there was much more representation in politics in Massachusetts. The economy was much more stable because it didn’t only rely on one form of income. Because there were many harbors in Massachusetts there were more towns which led to the need of new professions. There included Blacksmiths, Clothing makers, Merchants, and sailors. There was also much more cash flow in Massachusetts because there was no need to flaunt wealth and a much larger middle class. Another reason for the greater amounts of cash flow was that the people that lived in Massachusetts were mostly

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The colonies of Massachusetts and Virginia were located in separate regions of the New World and had many social and economic variations. The very laws and ideas these people have put into work are what have shaped America into the county it is today. When looking at these two colonies we know one thing is for sure, trade, land, religion, and natural resources were vital parts of their being. In this free-response essay I will contrast the colonies by how their societies were ran and how their economies affected their way of life.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main cause for the differences in their economy is due to the climate and location of each of the colonies. For example, the Virginia colony had good fertile soil and had the perfect weather condition for growing crops, while on the other hand, Massachusetts was a mountainous region that did not have as good of soil. Because of this, Virginia’s economy was based on crops, mainly tobacco, and the Massachusetts colony had to find other ways to use their natural resources to boast their economy. The Massachusetts colony had a lot of forests and trees, so they specialized in shipbuilding. The New England economy also consisted of fishing, and a small amount of crops, but nothing comparable to what Virginia was putting out in tobacco. The economy was clearly more diverse in the Massachusetts colony but there was something the Virginia colony had that Massachusetts did not, and that was land. Because there was an abundant amount of cheap land, it drew more colonists to that region. Another part of their contrasting economy was trade. Virginia was involved in the triangular trade, which traded slaves from Africa with goods from the colonies and England. Massachusetts trade differed from that of the south in two ways, “The lack of staples to exchange for English goods was a relative disadvantage, but the abundance of their own shipping and mercantile enterprise worked in their favor” (Tindall, 123).…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The variations within the share of categories were improbably massive and their entire economic structure differed from one another. Virginia had additional risky culture and social science where-as Massachusetts had an additional stable economy. The economy of Virginia was primarily based exclusively on the assembly of tobacco. The plantation homeowners had to shop for slaves to figure the fields that the slave traffic trade in Virginia was conjointly an enormous issue. The plantation homeowners were within the terribly made, elite class and just about ran the politics.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A main societal difference between the colonies in Virginia and the ones in Massachusetts is religion. Whereas the Virginian colonies were declared as Anglican, the colonies of Massachusetts were Puritan. An important point to be made here is that Massachusetts’ colonies were actually founded for religious reasons. The Puritans came to America to escape religious persecution…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was a huge transformation from the start to the end of the seventeenth century in England’s Virginia colony. The settlers in England’s Virginia colony faced a number of hardships, eventually the colony’s economy would prosper through the use of tobacco, but tobacco helped the social change of the colony by turning to indentured servants and slaves to do work on the labor-intensive tobacco plantations.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The settlements of Virginia and Massachusetts were both established during relatively the same time, but the ways that they were established differed tremendously. Virginia had difficulty establishing itself; there were many errors and failures, especially in the beginning. Massachusetts, on the other hand, was extremely successful. The settlers made smart decisions in provisions and planning that resulted in a prosperous colony. Virginia and Massachusetts also differed in their leadership quality. Virginia, initially, had weak leadership until John Smith who established a much more rigid government system within the colony. Massachusetts enjoyed successful leadership from the beginning with Joseph Winthrop. Joseph Winthrop was able to successfully develop the settlement, and a respected, well thought out society. Virginia and Massachusetts also differed in their work ethic. Virginia produced slothful workers and relied heavily on labor from the Natives. The Puritans of Massachusetts held onto a rigid lifestyle and were very hard-working. The differences in the settlement’s upbringing were not the only thing that divided the two colonies; the differing views on religion helped to shape the economy of both…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The economics of these colonies varied due to the area in which these colonies were located. Virginian economics were based on a cash-crop industry. This helped lead to the importing of slaves from Africa. Due to this importation of slaves there was a drastic divide in the social structure of Virginia, resulting in a three-layered society. Slaves were at the bottom, small farmers and laborers were in the middle, and wealthy plantation owners were at the top. Society in New England was not nearly as layered. The majority of families occupied what we today call the “middle class”. Although many New England families did own slaves, they typically owned only one or two.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This did not happen because it was designed as a profit making strategic society from the beginning. Their plans of fur trading, commercial farming, and manufacturing all did not work. The fur traders encountered Indian hostility, commercial farming didn’t work because of the absence of a ready market, and manufacturing was delayed because of the lack of knowledge in the local minerals. Their plan did not work at all but tobacco comes to save the Maryland colony. Maryland soon was known as the ‘tobacco colony”. Maryland and Virginia might have had similarities with economic and demographic experiences but they were very different when it came to politics and religion. The Maryland colony wanted a family centered colony but that didn’t happen either. They had a religious division between gentry and servants. Gentry members were Catholic and servants where mainly Protestants. Most servants were young males who were unmarried. Men outnumbered women more than three to one, married late in their twenties, and died before their mid-forties. They lacked strong family ties and often didn’t have parental…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the seventh century, Europeans established colonies in North America. The English colonies were originally established because proprietors from England were granted charters to settle and govern lands. Other European colonies were established around trading posts. Over time, the English gained control of the thirteen colonies through force or purchase; eventually, by regions were known as the Southern, Middle and New England colonies. Although the colonies were under the control of the English and had many commonalities, each region created a distinct culture. These similarities and differences can be evidenced when comparing the role of African Americans, a role of women, and types of settlers of the Middle colonies and The Southern…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Virginia and Massachusetts were the first two colonies settled by England in the New World. However, these colonies were very different from each other. Virginia’s economy, based heavily on slaves and other low-class workers, resulted in a very small, rich class having all influence and power. Massachusetts, in contrast, had an economy with a large middle class of “equals,” resulting in a more democratic government than that of Virginia. Overall, the first two English colonies in the Americas had extremely separate ways of creating economic and Economic development usually has a lasting influence on the political structure of any up-and-coming area. This certainly was the case for Virginia and Massachusetts. The Southern economy was based on the production of cash crops, predominantly tobacco, rice, and indigo. Crops were grown on large plantations that, by the mid 1600’s, had begun to use African slaves and lowly whites as the labor source. This meant that a lot of people worked for only a few people. Thus, the plantation owners tended to be wealthy, and they acted like it too. Many landowners hired a person in England to ship them goods that would fit the lifestyle. As a result, the South was cash poor, but the land and products owned had great potential value. The Massachusetts economy could not have been more different. Although the use of slaves and other servants did exist, it was miniscule compared to what was occurring in Virginia. Also, while plantation success depended on one system that could fail at any time, the Northern economy was more stable and diverse. In part because of the landscape, the Massachusetts colony was dependent on anything from shipbuilding, fishing, and whaling to farming, store-owning, and other types of artisan work. This allowed for a flexible economy with a large middle class that likely would survive if one market crashed. Meanwhile, if there had been a drought or drop in demand for tobacco, the whole Southern economy would have…

    • 598 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These to colonies had different ways to make money. Virginia was a plantation based and cash crop oriented economy. Each plantation became a community unto itself. This led to the importation of slaves from Africa to work the land. The population was mostly black slaves and there were rarely women. Even though this colony made lots of profit they had no families. There were lots of diseases and there was a high mortality rate. In the other hand the New England colonies made money by fishing and ship building. They couldn’t use the soil to build plantations because the soil was unfertile and the weather was extreme. During the winter the weather was extremely cold and during the summer the heat was extremely hot. Unlike the Virginia colony this colony had lots of families. There was a high birth rate that contributed to that factor. Even though it was a populous colony there was whole lot diversity. They also had a less mortality rate and lived a longer life. They lived up to 70…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The New England colonies and the Southern colonies are slightly similar in some aspects, but drastically different in most. For example the new england colonies were strictly puritan and they did not tolerate any other religion but the southern colonies were not dominated by a single religion which gave way to more liberal attitudes and some religious freedom. The economy of New England was powered mostly the manufacturing in factories, whereas the Southern colonies’ economies were more agriculturally based. The social structures were different, because the New England colonies didn’t believe in slavery, so the social ladders were not the same. Religious tolerance was another major difference in these two regions. Overall the New England and Southern colonies are slightly similar, but their differences set them apart from each other.`…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There were many similarities and differences in the many different colonies in North America. They all had farming and ranching, with fertile land. They all had basically the same climates in each of these colonies, they had freezing winters and very warm and humid colonies. All of these colonies were by the coast with sandy shores. They all had different founders, in the New England colonies their founder was Thomas Hooker, in the middle colonies their founder was William Penn, and in the southern colonies their founder was George II and James Edward Oglethorpe. They all had different geography, in the New England colonies they had forested hills with sea coasts, in the middle colonies their colonies they had rolling hills with lots of trees,…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Starting in the early 17th century the English began exploring the New World. Amongst the first groups to colonize included; the English in Virginia, Plymouth, and the Massachusetts Bay. Individually the colonies had their own reasons for inhabitation and exploration. They endured many circumstances that obstructed the beginning of their settlements. Each society evolved, adapted, and faltered in their separate ways.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Differences between the three colonies are distinct. The New England and Middle colonies acquire an identical social structure compared to the South, which has slaves and indentured servants. The New England and Middle colonies dislike discrimination because of their lifestyle, which designates man as equal in God’s eyes. Another dissimilarity is religious toleration. Although the New England colonies have an equal social structure, they do not endure those who possess a different faith other than a Puritan lifestyle. The Middle colonies possess a strong certitude for religious freedom. This is shown in their welcoming of other people of different faiths. The South also possesses some form of religious toleration for others. The economy of the colonies is also different. The New England colonies have a manufacturing type of economy because of the infertile land compared to the Southern colonies, which has a farm-based economy. The environment impacted the economy and agriculture in the New England Colonies; farming was not as important for making a living because of climate and geography. The environment also impacted the economy and agriculture of the Southern Colonies; farming was an important way to make a living because of its climate and geography. The differences between the New England Colonies and the Southern Colonies in agriculture included the climate and geography. The New England Colonies looked to their natural resources as a way to make a living; the environment forced them to look for other ways to make a living other than farming. The Southern Colonies didn't develop all their natural resources as a way to make a living; there was excellent soil for farming income, so there was no need to develop natural resources for manufacturing. The differences in manufacturing occurred between the Southern Colonies and the New England Colonies: The Southern Colonies developed their main natural resource, their farmland, and not much manufacturing; the…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays