Preview

Differences Between Of Mice And Men

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
721 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Differences Between Of Mice And Men
Artistic Beauty I have personally always thought that books have given a story more justice than the movie, and there has only been one incident where that was not true. I believe Of Mice and Men, although banned in literature for many reasons, has both its strengths and weaknesses in movie and book form. I think a book as detailed and filled with dialogue and emotion as this one, needs to not only be read or heard, but seen as well. There are always certain expectations when books are turned into movies. Everyone envisions them differently. In a way there is more pressure for it to be “perfect” then if there wasn’t a story everyone had already read. Many movies fulfill the part, many ruin the storyline completely. I judge very harshly …show more content…
Some changes bigger than others, some reasonable some irrational, they can all affect the way the film or book is viewed as a whole. For one, the book begins with the two hiding in the brush, while in the movie it begins with the incident in Weed, with the woman in the red dress running scared. Part of me doesn’t like how it technically hasn’t even started, and there are already changes from the book. The other part of me prefers it, due to it getting to the point quicker and inserting the reason they are hiding. It gives the movie a good hook and starts it off in a very eerie way. In the movie, it is also shown that they take a train out of Weed which is never mentioned in the book, which I see as more of a transitional scene to move the story along in the movie. Another difference in the movie was that Curley’s wife was a brunette when in fact she is a blonde. It wasn’t a huge thing that knocked the story off the road but it still is a change between the two. Going off of Curley’s wife, Curley seems to worry more about his wife and George’s relationship than the one of his wife and Slim, like in the book. I did like how one was able to really see what Curley’s wife was like more in the movie than in the book, because not only was there a face to put to her, but you also realize how much more she is looking for companionship and someone to talk …show more content…
I think although the scene of one of the workers asking Slim if someone else could take his place, is not in the book, it helped the spectators of the film understand more on who Lennie was. It also brought some humor into the movie because he kept stacking and stacking and stacking way more than the rest of them, whilst others needed two people to carry that same load and couldn’t catch up to Lennie’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The differences are subtle, but they are all there. One difference between the two are the order of events. Certain scenes, such as Paul and Albert's injuries, the French girls and Paul's leave, are all done in different orders in both the movie and book. In the book, the scenes play out like this; first the boys meet the French girls, then Paul has his leave and then finally Paul and Albert get injured However, in the movie the events play out as so; The boys meet the French girls (n this particular sequence of events meeting the French girls happens first, however, in the movie that scene is shown later then in the book), then Paul and Albert get injured, and then finally Paul has his leave. This difference is very trivial as it doesn't change anything significantly, however it is a pretty striking…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why is it that when a book gets it’s own movie that there are several differences between the book and the movie? Some people argue that the book is always better than the movie. There is a reason for this. Firstly, in most book to movie adaptations small details are changed or are just not included. Secondly, the movie often takes short cuts and doesn’t touch on certain aspects that were described in the book. Lastly, when reading a book you are free to make your own subtext and fill in the blanks with your imagination. The movie adaptations of books have always lacked the detail that's in the book, some things are completely cut from the movie to maintain a well paced story, and it fills in the gaps for us making the experience less unique.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think it is very important to make changes in the movies from the book because usually in books they are so descriptive to the point where some stuff aren’t that important or just too expensive to have in movies. With books you have to describe a lot to really paint a picture in someone’s mind, but in movies it will show you the really important parts from the book to really make up the movie and the whole plot, and without the plot it isn’t really based on the…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Red Fern Grows

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Personally, I like the book better. The movie just doesn't give enough information. It leaves out so many details from the book that it just messes up the story line. Don't get me wrong the movie was a great movie but it just wasn't good enough. It needed more details than what it had. The little details is what counts the…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The movie has some similar and different things than the book. The differences are more important than the similarities. .There are way more differences than similarities.The book is Better than the…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In general, I think that reading the book is always better than watching the movie and A Separate Peace definitely proved that. I thought that the drawback of the movie was that it was less personal than the novel. Although there were some things in the movie that I thought were better…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Given these points, the similarities and differences between Of Mice and Men, the movie and the book, become more clear. Lennie acts like George’s child while George tells him what to do and takes care of him. He loves touching anything soft, such as rabbits, puppies, and Curley’s wife’s hair. In contrast, Lennie is only referred to as an animal in the book when there are words outside of dialogue to describe him. The author also makes him seem much larger than he looks in the movie. This proves that it can be necessary to read a book and watch it’s movie to develop a well-rounded opinion of the…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my opinion i like the book because of the detail and the way the story is told. Let's start. First let's talk about the book. The book is much more detailed than the movie. Most people like the movie better than the book for the simple fact people don't like to read.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Book And Movie Comparison

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There were many differences between the book and movie. One of the differences in the movie is there is a tornado tracker guy gets information on the tornado, but in the book there isn’t a tornado tracker guy. In the movie, Stacey doesn’t help get Dan ad Arthur out of the basement out of the basement, but in the book, she does. In the movie, the Mom doesn’t give instructions to Dan and Arthur, but in the book she does. In the movie, when Mom leaves the house, she’s checking if Grandmas okay, but in the book, she checks on Mrs. Smiley. In the book, Mrs. Smiley is one of the characters, but in the movie, she isn’t one of the characters. In the book, Dan drives the police car, but in the movie, Dan drives through roadblocks to get to Grandma. In the movie, the Dad got stuck under a car and got rescued, but in the book, the Dad never got stuck under a car. In the movie, Dan sneaks into the car when the Dad is looking for the Mom, but in the book, that doesn’t happen. In the movie, Dan has an earring, but in the book, he doesn’t. In the movie, Grandma dies, but in the book, Mrs. Smiley dies. In the movie, when the family…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Take the ending for example, in the movie she had a fight scene with the main bad character in the movie. In the book she didn’t, she ended up having to fight her boyfriend, but not the bad character. In the movie she forced the woman to shut off the bad simulation people were in. In the book she did it herself; this changed the ending in many ways.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many differences between the movie and book “Of Mice and Men” the director, Gary Sinies, was the of the movie and the author of the book was John Steinbeck. The two men had their different views on the story and put in in a way to entertain people. There are some scenes in the movie to add some more character to the person and fill in some missing holes. That would be one difference.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The next thing I’d notice was the young man actually walked into the old man's room. In the book he just bursts into his room and does the cruel deed to the old man. In the movie they just look at each other. But in the movie as they look at each other the young man also walks closer. This was another major thing they changed.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One thing in particular that the book does much better is making use of complex metaphors and themes, such as: the river for life, and oneness with nature, that string themselves together as you turn each page of the book, while in the movie the metaphors and symbolism are represented in a much different way through picture. In the book, both themes regarding the river are very vivid and clear, as they use strong imagery of nature to draw pictures in the minds of the readers. In the movie both themes are represented and referred to much less because of the lack of narration.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of Mice and Man

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One major difference between the book and the movie are the scenes. One example is the scene in the barn when George took the mule in there to fix its hoof. This scene doesn’t happen in the book because the author spent a lot more time describing Curly’s wife’s personality, so it was easier to visualize. I think this scene is necessary for the movie because it helps you better understand Curly’s wife. Another scene is when the book describes George sharing his beans with Lennie, and also pulls out two spoons one for himself and one for Lennie, which shows that George cares about him and is planning to have a future together. This scene was not included in the movie and I think that was not a good idea. This scene would have perfectly fit into the storyline and showed George’s feelings toward Lennie. Another difference in the scenes is the one where Crooks, Candy, and Lennie are gathered in Crook’s room. Curly’s wife arrives and Crooks has the nerve to stand up to her and she gets mad at Crooks and threatens to have him hanged and no one would object. Crooks then shuts up and lets her do what she wants. This scene should have been in the movie, but was not. I think not including this scene was a bad idea because it does not show Curly’s wife’s true nature.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My first reason is; the movie again had more visuals than the book. Expanding on this; the movie had more scenery to show the viewer where the story takes place. Additionally, the movie also showed the the time era it took place in through setting; this in turn gives the viewer a better idea of how to perceive the story in this aspect. Second the movie had the advantage of being able to show what was going on through setting. My first reason being the movie showed the position of the characters and their behavior; this in turn displayed the tension through setting. Moreover, the movie also showed the main character’s whereabouts better through visual transitions. Last but not least, the movie showed more setting changes than the book. The book could only tell the reader that there was a change in the setting; these are usually major changes; the movie could show the more subtle ones, adding to the quality of the experience. The movie also set the mood better than the book through setting changes or adjustments. Concluding this; I believe the movie expressed the setting better than the…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays