Differences Between Passive and Active Euthanasia
Differences Between Passive and Active Euthanasia
Abstract
Euthanasia is one word that is part of a nationwide debate that is often wrought with resistance due to selective terms being used interchangeably to result in misunderstandings and mass confusion. These combinations of individual terms create for completely different meanings, meanings that have already been instilled into the minds of human society that contribute to misconceptions about euthanasia. Euthanasia is defined as the intentional termination of life by another at the request of the person who is to receive their right to die, instead of dying naturally. There are many correlating synonyms of “eu” good and “thanatos” death: death with dignity, mercy killing, compassion in dying, and murder are some expressed by those who support as well as those against euthanasia. One important objective that will be met is the clarification of all labels associated with euthanasia: voluntary, non-voluntary, involuntary, passive, active, and omission. It is through describing the differences between passive and active euthanasia that similarities will be unearthed while also including intent, refusal, and request. Euthanasia has been linked to physician-assisted suicide (PAS), both of which are commonly debated due to being considered morally unethical. Advancements in medical technology are requiring alteration in traditional rules and fundamental concepts that will continue to promote the greatest life for the greatest amount of people possible. Legalization of voluntary active euthanasia requires weighing all possible consequences using the utilitarian hedonic calculus to best estimate as to whether this action will result in the highest level of pleasure.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PASSIVE AND ACTIVE EUTHANASIA
Step 1: Identify the Problem The debate over euthanasia centers on the sanctity of human life and rights that are given to live that life. Supporters argue that the practice of euthanasia gives the
Abstract
Euthanasia is one word that is part of a nationwide debate that is often wrought with resistance due to selective terms being used interchangeably to result in misunderstandings and mass confusion. These combinations of individual terms create for completely different meanings, meanings that have already been instilled into the minds of human society that contribute to misconceptions about euthanasia. Euthanasia is defined as the intentional termination of life by another at the request of the person who is to receive their right to die, instead of dying naturally. There are many correlating synonyms of “eu” good and “thanatos” death: death with dignity, mercy killing, compassion in dying, and murder are some expressed by those who support as well as those against euthanasia. One important objective that will be met is the clarification of all labels associated with euthanasia: voluntary, non-voluntary, involuntary, passive, active, and omission. It is through describing the differences between passive and active euthanasia that similarities will be unearthed while also including intent, refusal, and request. Euthanasia has been linked to physician-assisted suicide (PAS), both of which are commonly debated due to being considered morally unethical. Advancements in medical technology are requiring alteration in traditional rules and fundamental concepts that will continue to promote the greatest life for the greatest amount of people possible. Legalization of voluntary active euthanasia requires weighing all possible consequences using the utilitarian hedonic calculus to best estimate as to whether this action will result in the highest level of pleasure.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PASSIVE AND ACTIVE EUTHANASIA
Step 1: Identify the Problem The debate over euthanasia centers on the sanctity of human life and rights that are given to live that life. Supporters argue that the practice of euthanasia gives the
References: Diane petty and the right to die. (2012). In Life. Retrieved from: http://www.life.org.nz/euthanasia/abouteuthanasia/euthanasia-controversy/Default.htm Duvnjak, D Ethics: euthanasia and physician assist suicide. (2012). In BBC. Retrieved from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/euthanasia/overview/introduction.shtml Euthanasia Terminology Frileux, S. (2003). When is physician assisted suicide or euthanasia acceptable? J Med Ethics. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1733803/ Guido, G.W Jevon, P. (2009). Care of the dying and deceased patient: a practical guide for nurses. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing. Lentz, C.A. (2009). The refractive thinker, volume III: change management. Retrieved from: http://lentzleadership.com/books.php Pro-euthanasia arguments Rachels, J. (1975) Active and passive euthanasia. Bioethics: An Anthology. Retrieved from: Volbrecht, R.M