Differences Between Pinker And Elizabeth Spelke

Throughout the debate, Steven Pinker and Elizabeth Spelke, discussed prevalent and recent research on the mind, brain, and behavior that may constitute for the differences in men and women. On the one hand, Steven Pinker, focused on the real sex differences that he believes to exist. As a result, he presents to the audience with evidence, throughout his presentation in order, to in reality, present and support his argument that there are, in fact, sex differences between men and women. For example, Pinker states that stereotypes reflect actual differences by stating that Jussim and Eccles described that most gender stereotypes are accurate. Additionally, Pinker goes on to conclude his speech stating that there, is in fact, “more than a shred
He believes that sex differences exist between men and women and should definitely be considered. For example, one prevalent sex difference that unsettled me was the fact that Pinker states that men and women differ in what they state that their priorities are. According to a research study that is provided states that “[m]en, on average, are more likely to chase status on the expense of family, and other valuable things in life.” Under these circumstances, it is acceptable to conclude that men are definitely superior in achieving higher status and caring more about valuable things in life compared to women. Cheerlessly, I truly believe that this is not the case due to the fact that this is simply a stereotype. Moreover, Pinker further strengthens this notion by providing evidence that men and women are different due to the fact that their personal importance differs. For instance, in this particular section of Pinker’s presentation he establishes that women tend to say that what they establish to be “personally important” primarily has to do with relationships with other individuals, hence empathizers compared to men being systemizers. For example, men consider “personally important” trying to invent or create something, which I definitely believe not to be true. As clearly demonstrated, Pinker, states that sex differences
Spelke, in her presentation enacts various, in my opinion, examples that are effective in proving that men and women do not share predominant sex differences, contrarily seen in Pinker. She clearly communicates that men and women are much more similar than originally believed. For example, she states that babies are typically labeled from the second that they are born. Under those circumstances, they are treated differently based on the social construction and stereotypes that are highly found throughout the whole world. She provides an example where a baby is presented to individuals, although its name changes on two different occasions. Upon giving the baby a name, either a typical male or female name, the individuals examining the baby, will ultimately have distinct responses based on the name given. Furthermore, another prime example that Spelke provides the audience with is highly analytical and demonstrates how there is discrimination rooted in everyday lives. A gender labeling study was conducted which established that people being hired were predominantly men compared to women due to the fact that individuals consider men as superior. In this study Robert, the man, would be hired 70% of the time, compared to Ruth, the women, at 45%. As a result of these studies, one can definitely conclude that men and women do not share similarities, despite biological ones such as the