supposed to have a newspaper that he folds with certain slowness, but in the movie it is just a book that he simply closes. This loses its dramatic effect. Obviously, the book and the movie differ in many ways. In my opinion, the book is better.
I believe that holding a real book and utilizing one’s imagination is always better. The reason I like “To Kill A Mockingbird” better in book form is that you can get creative and imagine what’s happening in your head. For example, when Scout rolls into the Radley’s yard you can “see” the expression on Scout’s face and hear the laugh from Boo. I also think that the book gives more details that make it more vivid. With a movie is is just… there. Of course the movie is great if you are a visual learner and want to watch every single detail. The problem is that the book that was written first has more details and more information. The book allows the reader to use all of his or her senses to bring the book to
life. As you can see, the book and movie really do differ from each other; however, although they differ, this does not mean that one is less valuable. One allows personal reflection and imagination, while the other is more for entertainment value. The movie cuts out things that are important to the reader, yet the movie is entertaining and a good story. While both convey the same basic story, theme, message, and moral the book in comparison is far better.