Digital Rhetorical Analysis
The digital world, especially its omnipresence and highly structured environment, has introduced a new sort of rhetoric which holds a significant effect on identity. Digital rhetoric theory has come about as a result of communication occurring via various electric formats (Plessis 2013 p. 2). The Internet functions as a source which promotes “rethinking of identity as anonymous, fluid, and unfixed” because of its collaborative nature (Hess 2014 p. 3). Users are always interacting with the readily available information by creating something new, building on the contributions of others, or merely witnessing this online expansion. The only constant of the Internet is the fact that it is constantly changing. Because the recent digital world develops
…show more content…
The digital world is everywhere we look. The world revolves around technology, in particular phones, televisions, computers, and radios, that we rely heavily on for instantaneous communication and immediate access to media. Society has attached itself to the use of technology like cell phones, which have capabilities equivalent to those of computers possible because of the advancements of mobile and wireless technology (Porter 2009 p. 213). Because society is extensively surrounded by and embedded in technology and its digital presence, it is inescapable. As a result of technological advancements, the Internet does not need a physical place to be powerful, in that, it is portable and accessible. As Hess (2014) states, “The internet no longer appears as a place that is accessed from desktop computers; it is everywhere, in our pockets and always on” (p. 6). As most movements or innovations in the world require a physical and stationary platform to function and expand, the internet does not. Essentially, this makes the Internet indestructible and undefeatable, as there is not physical item to destroy. Nearly every teenager of adult owns a smart phone and never fails to travel or do anything without it, allowing people constant access to the Internet and communication with others using a simple Wi-Fi connection. The digital world’s mobility, in combination with our feeding dependence on it, provide technology with great power. This argument is not solely about the fact that the Internet has power, but the consequences of the Internet’s power. In society, there is minimal acknowledgment of the idea that the use of machines, like mobile phones, requires an Internet connection which billions of others users are connected to. The necessary connection requires that people all over the world cohere, creating a consequential web and
The digital world is everywhere we look. The world revolves around technology, in particular phones, televisions, computers, and radios, that we rely heavily on for instantaneous communication and immediate access to media. Society has attached itself to the use of technology like cell phones, which have capabilities equivalent to those of computers possible because of the advancements of mobile and wireless technology (Porter 2009 p. 213). Because society is extensively surrounded by and embedded in technology and its digital presence, it is inescapable. As a result of technological advancements, the Internet does not need a physical place to be powerful, in that, it is portable and accessible. As Hess (2014) states, “The internet no longer appears as a place that is accessed from desktop computers; it is everywhere, in our pockets and always on” (p. 6). As most movements or innovations in the world require a physical and stationary platform to function and expand, the internet does not. Essentially, this makes the Internet indestructible and undefeatable, as there is not physical item to destroy. Nearly every teenager of adult owns a smart phone and never fails to travel or do anything without it, allowing people constant access to the Internet and communication with others using a simple Wi-Fi connection. The digital world’s mobility, in combination with our feeding dependence on it, provide technology with great power. This argument is not solely about the fact that the Internet has power, but the consequences of the Internet’s power. In society, there is minimal acknowledgment of the idea that the use of machines, like mobile phones, requires an Internet connection which billions of others users are connected to. The necessary connection requires that people all over the world cohere, creating a consequential web and