Preview

Dimopoulos Dimosthenis Realism and Complex Interdependence Summary

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
340 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dimopoulos Dimosthenis Realism and Complex Interdependence Summary
In Keohane and Nye, “Realism and Complex Interdependence”, Chapter 1-3, two major questions are attempted to be answered: what are the major features of world politics when interdependence, particularly economic interdependence, is extensive; and how and why do international regimes change.
In these chapters, Nye and Keohane, as they attempt to explain power and interdependence, articulates two main forms of interdependence: sensitivity and vulnerability. They opt to contrast their theory of world politics, which is called Complex Interdependence with Realism.
Realism has three main characteristics: a) states are the key actors in world politics; b) force is a useable and competent tool for states and c) world politics issues are organized hierarchal with military security as their pinnacle. On the other hand, Complex Interdependence is based on the following: a) the key actors in world politics are states; transnational actors and organizations, which communicate via informal and formal channels, b) there is no clear hierarchy in world politic issues and c) force is not used when complex interdependence prevails on a set of issues.
Keohane’s and Nye’s theory gives rise to political processes which translate power into outcomes, such as: a) Because there is no clear hierarchy of issues, state goals will vary by issue, as will the distribution of power and the political process associated with the issue; b) the politics of agenda formation and control will become more important because there is no clear hierarchy (domestic and other groups may be able to politicize issues that would not otherwise make the international agenda); c) the line between domestic and international politics becomes blurred because there are multiple channels of interaction and d) the increasingly significant role for international organizations. Subsequently, they provide four possible models under which international regimes change and they seek to combine them in their efforts to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    WK 5 Assignment

    • 2478 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The International Relations theory that best fits the Gini-out-of-the-bottle approach for this report is the theory of realism. There are five different classes of realism but the two that stands out to me are classic and neorealism. Classic realism leans towards those that represent a pessimistic view and the fact that people are not often what they appear to be and they it would behoove a government not to be so trusting of others. Neorealism represents the struggle of someone that is greedy for more such as power.…

    • 2478 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Then he moved on to Hindess’ analysis of power as a simple given quantity. He believed that power can only be achieved by the ruler of a political community if he/she is duly recognized by the citizens as their leader. This has been the central idea of modern international relations thinking. But it is still a part of the capacity-outcome view of power which Hindess is trying to ignore due to its simplicity. He enumerated the reasons why a capacity-outcome view weaken its right as an explanatory device based on Hindess. First is that power is an interaction and one in which the reciprocal action of the parties’ means that each actor’s moves conditions the action of the other, and the different means to exercise ‘power’ are seldom compatible.…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    President and Congress

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The era of globalization has witnessed the growing influence of a number of unconventional international actors, from non-governmental organizations, to multi-national corporations, to global political movements. Traditional, state-centric definitions of foreign policy as "the policy of a sovereign state in its interaction with other sovereign states is no longer sufficient. Several alternative definitions are more helpful at highlighting aspects of foreign policies.…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A key tenet of realist thinking is the concept of power, or more specifically, ‘hard power’ and its uses within the realm of international relations. It is the ability to make other actors comply with a state’s will through the use of force and threat (Copeland 2010). With this key tenet, comes the realist notion of an ongoing balancing of power between states. Some have gone so far as to call it “the central theoretical concept of international relations” (Snyder 1984). This realist sentiment can easily…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Donnelly, Jack, Realism and International Relations, (2004), The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press , pp. 6-43…

    • 4317 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civilization Vs Savagery

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Lord of the Flies by William Golding is a novel that makes a stance on how no single human being is not all good. While humans are the most well developed mammal on planet Earth there is a reason that they are still considered a part of the Animal Kingdom. There is a savage, almost evil instinct buried in each human being. The events of the past and circumstances surrounding the human are the deciding factors of whether or not the evil instinct is released. The novel, Lord of the Flies, draws attention to this topic with three main characters. The theme of civilization vs. savagery is a theme carried by the plot of the novel; innocence and sanity are what are lost as a result of savagery. Golding uses Ralph,…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The end of the Cold War sparked optimism for the end of power politics. The spread of democracy, liberalization of financial markets, and uncontested unipolarity of the United States supported the view that cooperation, rather than conflict, would define the new era. The long-dominant international relations theory of realism waned, while more nuanced and optimistic theories gained followings. The theory of constructivism in particular, which explains interactions in the international system as the result of malleable “social constructs” rather than an ironclad systemic structure, caught as a means of capturing the variance in states’ behaviors within the same international system and explaining how state personalities could impact state policies.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hong Kong Protest

    • 2343 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A realist sometimes names ‘structural realist’, for realists, the international system is defined by anarchy, which means there is no central authority (Waltz, 1979). States are considered as sovereign and autonomous of each other, and there is…

    • 2343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Realism vs. Liberalism

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Viotti, P; Kauppi, M. (1999) International Relations Theory. Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond. (3rd) Needham Heights, US: Allyn and Bacon.…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Power, Causation & Explanation Author(s): Terence Ball Reviewed work(s): Source: Polity, Vol. 8, No. 2 (Winter, 1975), pp. 189-214 Published by: Palgrave Macmillan Journals Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3234201 . Accessed: 17/09/2012 00:17…

    • 9866 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    September 2007. A previous version was presented at the 48th annual meeting of International Studies Association, Chicago, IL, USA, 28 February to 3 March 2007. We thank Hein Goemans and Håvard Strand for helpful discussions and comments. This is a preliminary draft of work in progress; Please ensure that you have the current version before citing. Kristian Skrede Gleditsch (corresponding author) is Reader, Department of Government, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK (email: ksg@essex.ac.uk). Andrea Ruggeri is a PhD Candidate, Department of Government, University of Essex (email: arugge@essex.ac.uk).…

    • 7521 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Does Power Matter

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How does power matter in world affairs? First, power is seen a means of influence governing the kinds of settlements that nations achieve, or circumstances nations must undergo. Second, power could construct political geography, varying the impact of physical distance and differentiating conflicts among nations that are possible from those that are very unlikely. Third, power may be viewed as the determinant for a state’s preferences, which may cause cooperation or opposition. These factors give states the capability to promote national interests, to win an international bargaining, and to shape the rules governing interaction in the global…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Complex Interdependence, the theory popularized by Koehane and Nye, proposes the subordination of the military power to the economic benefits that they will receive from cooperation with the states; the concept of interdependence, wherein the action of an actor in the international sphere affects the other actors in the system. This interconnectedness emphasized by the arrival of globalization, therefore isolation and separations are rarely possible except in the case of North Korea who successfully divorces itself from the world but comes at a great economic cost. This theory will help give an answer to the alarming issue by illustrating it into a comprehensible…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carr, Morgenthau, Reinhold Niebuhr and George Kennan consider that international relations should be realistic, as opposed to the realistic ones, although, a few years later, R. Ashley discards realism because it is undermined by „international antinomies” and because it is far from being a „harmonious tradition”. M.J. Smith, Roger Speagle and K. Goldmann favour the same conclusion, claiming that this collection of ideas which are labelled „realism” is so vagne and incoerent that is wrong to believe in the very existence of Realism and of converging points of view.…

    • 5081 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Am I

    • 2362 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The three theories of international relations, realism, liberalism, and constructivism, work in different ways to explain the workings of the world. This paper seeks to justify what makes me a self-designated constructivist. In examining the development of conflicts throughout the history by the taking a look the era of the World Wars as well as the more recent events of terrorism and the rise of China, I attempt to explain with the best arguments of each IR theory in my opinion, what it was that caused these conflicts, and adjudicate at the end why constructivism does in my opinion the best overall job in doing so.…

    • 2362 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays