Preview

Directors Duties

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2415 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Directors Duties
Hampton Park Pty Ltd (HP)
Synopsis.
In the case study of Hampton Park Pty Ltd (HP) has four directors; William (Managing Director); Susan, Jack and Gail (Non-executive directors). As HP’s financial position begins to deteriorate, George, the Chief Financial Officer of the company advises the accounts still show a profit and the company would have a solid base to pay out a dividend to its members. In July 2010cHP’s financial state worsens however George declares a technical profit and advises HP can still declare the dividend. June 2010 there was a change in the law for the declaration of dividends however George did not find out about this until late September 2010, the same time the board signed off the financial reports and therefore George could not inform HP of the company’s financial difficulties. The board not knowing George’s advice was regarded as not true, seen it as favourable advice and decided to sign off the reports and declare the dividend to members. Susan was absent from this meeting from an unknown cause. Soon after her dividend was paid the company went into liquidation.
The issues relating to this case is whether there have been any breaches of the officers and directors duty of care under the corporations act and what consequences will be made if such breaches occur. Another issue is whether there have been any breaches of directors duties in relation to insolvent trading and what defences are available for directors who have breached their duties. And also what consequences are in order if such breaches occur.

Issue 1: Breaches of a Director’s and Officer’s Duties under the Corporations Act.

Director’s duties are supported by the Corporations Act (2001)1. Under section 180, it requires directors to act with a degree of care and diligence. Section 1812 requires directors and other officers to act in good faith, in the best interests of the company and for a proper purpose. Section 1823 and 1834 requires directors to not



References: WA Court of Appeal in Vrisakis v Australian Securities Commission (1993) 11 ACSR 162 at 170Williams v Scholz [2007] QSC 266 Legislation: Harris, J. Hargovan, A. Adams, M. Australian Corporate Law LexisNexis Butterworths 4th edition, 2013. Websites: Corporations Act (2001) http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ca2001172/s180.html Directors’ Duties – The Insolvent Trading Issues From a Lawyers Perspective, (18 February 2004), Allens Arthur Robinson. http://www.allens.com.au/pubs/pdf/insol/pap18feb04.pdf

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ciro T, Symes C, Corporations Law in Principle LBC Thomson Reuters, Sydney, 8th edition 2009…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It depend upon the approach of the legal duties of the administrators which were framework in the Corporation Act. The court has noticed that the appellant provide the legal duties approaching the suer and the duties which were performed was not for the benefit of himself although it was not for the benefit of other partner too. It was only for the benefit of the company. It was noticed by the court that there has been contravention of legal duties performed by the offender discarding the prosecutor out of the building for profit and loss account and also regarding the goodwill of the company.The court held that the offender has to paid a premium for the losses which has been incurred. Although the court told them that in order for compensation they can buy shares from offender for their losses incurred.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Tony, C. & Christopher, S. 2009, Corporations Law in Principle, 8th edn, Thompson Reuters, Australia…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "The 16th edition incorporates a number of significant recent amendments to legislation and case law. These include: Personal Property Securities (Corporations and Other Amendments) Act 2011 [...], Corporations Amendment (Financial Market Supervision) Act 2010 [...], Corporations Amendment (Corporate Reporting Reform) Act 2011 [...], Corporations Amendment (Sons of Gwalia) Act 2011 [...], Corporations Amendment (Improving Accountability on Director and Executive Remuneration) Act 2011 [...]. This edition also includes a number of important cases, the most significant of which are Morley v ASIC and ASIC v Healey, dealing with directors' duty of care." -- Back cover.…

    • 41100 Words
    • 141 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Law: Bamford V Bamford – Director allots shares for an IMPROPER PURPOSE. Shareholders could ratify the decision or make him pay for the shares.…

    • 1712 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    assigment

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If directors put their interest in corporation more than the best interest toward corporation then there is breach of duty. And if there and any dishonesty involve in decision making then that is breach of the fiduciary duties…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Directors Duties

    • 4686 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Director’s Duties are part of the idea of risk management; because they take risks all the time, they require a certain element of regulation. The law must provide a way of mitigating against the risk, so creditors and shareholders can have potential recourse. This is all done indirectly; the company will recover in the event of a breach of duty arising. If the company recovers and suffers no harm, then that protects shareholders and makes sure their investments are secure. It also protects the creditors, who are more likely to get paid.…

    • 4686 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law Class Notes

    • 3272 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Liability comes into picture when directors or officers tend to cause financial harm to the corporation, commit a crime or try to breach their duty of care to the corporation. The directors often forget that they are elected or appointed to the position of the director by the shareholders based on their qualifications and with the responsibility and trust to protect the shareholders interest and maximize their gain. However, they start placing their own interest in front of the interest of the shareholders and the company. Hence the integrity and loyalty of the directors is questioned on continues basis in the business world.…

    • 3272 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    SHOULD PANELS BE BOUND BY AB: STARE DECISIS AND HIERARCHY IN THE WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT…

    • 6318 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This act of John Young, the Leston Corporation’s chief financial officer, has neglected to follow the IMA’s ethical standard which fall under two classification: competence and credibility. He effectively discovered that the major competitor for this organization is probably to file for bankruptcy, yet he didn’t give that essential information to the board meeting as they can examine about this matter. He failed to fulfil the obligation as the competence category should provide decision support information that are accurate, clear, concise, and timely. He didn’t give the information of the competitor’s bankruptcy in timely manner as the executive meeting already been held. Besides, refer to the credibility category, they ought to disclose immensely…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Paul Smith, the member of the audit team entered into a business venture with the CFO of JD Ltd. This is a business relationship between an audit team member and an officer from audit client, who is able to influence the financial report of JD Ltd. More importantly, although Paul Smith claims that the 2 entities are in different non-competing industries, their same interest in PJ Motors is so significant. In this case, Paul Smith has to stop the business in PJ Motors to reduce the threat to insignificant level. Otherwise he will be removed from audit team.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    DELIMA SIAP

    • 2365 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This case is about an enterprise founded by family members and later was incorporated as Sdn Bhd. The shareholders are mainly the directors of husband and wife who involved in the management of the company. It was July, 2006 when Encik Zayed engaged the external auditor Aziz & Co(Chartered Accountant) introduced by his friend to perform the statutory audit for the period of 2003 to 2006. That was the first audit experience for Encik Zayed and Puan Hashimah and it was a difficult learning experience. The Auditors expressed their intention to qualify the Financial Statements due to several unresolved issues. However, Encik Zayed and Puan Hashimah tried to negotiate with the Auditor to not qualify the Financial Statements, failing which Encik Zayed planned to terminate the auditor’s appointment and appoint a new “friendly party” auditor. Encik Zayed and Puan Hashimah were not familiar with Accounting Standards and the provisions of the Companies Act 1965, including their roles and duties as Company Directors. The company had maintained a very lean organization and had employed their owned family members as its employees and some did not have the necessary job experiences. Time was the essence and the Audited Financial Statements had to be issued to the bank at least by September, 2006, as Encik…

    • 2365 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The requirements of section 135 of the Companies Act 1993 that a company should not be carried in such a way as to create substantial risks of serious loss to a company’s creditors has been criticized as virtually imposing a warranty of solvency. Additionally, the taking of substantial business risks is a necessary part of business and there will be many circumstances in which directors who take such risks are not fairly open to criticism if the risks later crystallise1. A literal approach on the plain words of s 135 therefore would, on their face, potentially cover conduct which might fall short of recklessness. Nevertheless, in interpreting this section, the Courts have made it clear that a breach of s 135 requires an element of illegitimate risk taking. This has been discussed comprehensively in the case of Jordan and Vance v O’Sullivan and Ors,2 where Clifford J added his support to William Young J’s approach in applying s 135 so as to create distinction between legitimate and illegitimate risk taking activity and not following the alternative view of those who felt compelled to construe s 135 in a literal manner.3…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Liquidation Law

    • 2445 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The remit of Working Group D (Insolvency and Corporate Securities) of the Corporate Law Reform Committee (CLRC) is to consider the current law and practice relevant to corporate insolvency. The objective of the review of this area of the law is for the creation of a corporate insolvency framework:…

    • 2445 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    BEC case

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages

    most recent foray into the realm of directors’ duties – its decision in the Peoples case –…

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays