Disadvantages Of Group Interaction Analysis
Devising was one of the fundamental element to my group practical work, The challenges the group faced were the task of combining each individuals' stories together as the group consisted of three actors in contrast to the other groups that consisted of two actors per group. The fact that the group consisted of three actors did hold its advantages for example, there was an extended amount of material to work with whilst on the other hand the amount of material hindered are development as a result of this issue the group spent too much time trying to combined three separate stories in order to create a coherent performance. At times my partners and I lost the aim of focus which were the actions of the score rather than story. “Choreography itself
doesn’t necessarily possess meaning, it’s the contexts of which that choreography is presented that presents the meaning” by Scott Graham (Frantic Assembly)
What we should of done is drop the ogrinal stories earlier on in the process as some of our actions within our final score was repitive and was unneeded. Play more and take more risks in action this would helped dramatise are physical score further. Had more of awareness in our behaviour towards the Diversing process in relations Scott graham mentioning it the presentation of context that hold the meaning and the engagement of the actors within this that provokes a storie which the audience will pecieve regardless rather than the original narrative or actors intent.
Not to forget the practises that we had done earlier in the process for example in original individual stories as well as the exercises that we had done at the beginning of the module.
Though Grotoskwi advise that the exercises should be introduce later on in the development process one the final score has been established (add in page no.)
In my opinion the early introduction to the exercise benfited me an actor , to further my understanding methodology of ‘fixing’.
“It is not the structure or the content of the work that needs to be fixed but the pre-expressive form of the actors” (Turner, 67)
doesn’t necessarily possess meaning, it’s the contexts of which that choreography is presented that presents the meaning” by Scott Graham (Frantic Assembly)
What we should of done is drop the ogrinal stories earlier on in the process as some of our actions within our final score was repitive and was unneeded. Play more and take more risks in action this would helped dramatise are physical score further. Had more of awareness in our behaviour towards the Diversing process in relations Scott graham mentioning it the presentation of context that hold the meaning and the engagement of the actors within this that provokes a storie which the audience will pecieve regardless rather than the original narrative or actors intent.
Not to forget the practises that we had done earlier in the process for example in original individual stories as well as the exercises that we had done at the beginning of the module.
Though Grotoskwi advise that the exercises should be introduce later on in the development process one the final score has been established (add in page no.)
In my opinion the early introduction to the exercise benfited me an actor , to further my understanding methodology of ‘fixing’.
“It is not the structure or the content of the work that needs to be fixed but the pre-expressive form of the actors” (Turner, 67)