Preview

Discuss the Stowers V. Wolodzko Case Questions

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1197 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Discuss the Stowers V. Wolodzko Case Questions
Week 2 DQ 1
Discuss the Stowers v. Wolodzko case questions.

. The husband of the plaintiff file a petition to the court that his wife[plaintiff] is mentally ill and needs to have a court order directing the admission of her to the mental health hospital. The petition initiated by plaintiff’s husband is the order of the Wayne County probate court, and it is also appropriately certified by Doctors Wolodzko, who after appearing in her house and introducing himself as a doctor , and have a conversation with her in person that day and another day in telephone, determine that she is suffering from paranoid schizophrenia and Smyk. The court gave the order and the Plaintiff was taken by ambulance from her home to a private psychiatric hospital. Before leaving, defendant would not respond to her request to use the telephone, and when she attempted to, it was taken from her. She made it clear that she certainly didn't want to go to the hospital, but she did go anyway, escorted by the two attendants who came with the defendant. The plaintiff refused to consent to the treatment by the defendant, refused any medication, and refused to eat for five days. She was placed in blocked by bars, locked and bare room for six days. Defendant permitted no phone calls or letters in or out. Defendant telephoned orders in and prescribed certain medication. He often visited her during her stay. She was allowed to see her husband and children, but the no communications with the outside world, until a few days before she was discharged. She was forcibly held down by nurses until she stopped fighting to a second injection of a tranquilizer. She had previously been given a similar injection over her objection. The injections were ordered by defendant.
The jury determined that the above facts were sufficient to find defendant guilty of the torts of false imprisonment, assault and battery. The jury grants Summary judgments for defendants Anthony Smyk and Ardmore Acres Hospital.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Was Speelman’s substansive and procedural due process violated, as well as her right to a preliminary injunction?…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Anna Hilo Case Digest

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In enforcing this paragraph, the department shall have, upon a finding of the State Surgeon General or the State Surgeon General’s designee that probable cause exists to believe that the licensee is unable to practice medicine because of the reasons stated in this paragraph, the authority to issue an order to compel a licensee to submit to a mental or physical examination by physicians designated by the department. If the licensee refuses to comply with such order, the department’s order directing such examination may be enforced by filing a petition for enforcement in the circuit court where the licensee resides or does business. The licensee against whom the petition is filed may not be named or identified by initials in any public court records or documents, and the proceedings shall be closed to the public. The department shall be entitled to the summary procedure provided in s. 51.011. A licensee or certificate holder affected under this paragraph shall at reasonable intervals be afforded an opportunity to demonstrate that he or she can resume the competent practice of medicine with reasonable skill and safety to…

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The client is a 70 year old, Caucasian male who is a retired siding salesman from Riverside, IA, who has an extensive history with Paralysis agitans (Parkinson’s disease). The client was first admitted to the long term care facility in December 2012. The client explained that he came to be at this facility after “already being in two places like this”. He was removed/discharged from the last long-term care facility for being what he called “disruptive”. The client described the staff at the last facility as not very kind to the residents. There was an incident where the drugs that were prescribed to the client made him hallucinate and he became unruly with the staff and was restrained and…

    • 4616 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    to say she was guilty. To prove this, there were no signs of forced entry and her alibis…

    • 565 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Singleton had been sentenced to death in 1979. As he began to deteriorate mentally in 1987, he exhibited paranoid and delusional symptoms. He was diagnosed with schizophrenia. Medication was necessary to control these symptoms. Ten years later, he expressed distorted beliefs and that he was going to kill a physician and the president. Because of his dangerousness, the Medical Review Panel agreed to force medication on him under a Harper involuntary medication order. The Due Process Clause allows them to do so since he is a seriously mentally ill inmate who may be a danger to himself and others and it may be in his best interests. In 2000, he had a petition filed for habeas corpus contesting that the state could not make him competent with medication and then have him executed. His petition was denied by the district court because they found “no evidence in this record that the actions and the decisions of the medical personnel involved were in any degree motivated by the desire, purpose or intent to make Mr. Singleton competent so that he could be executed”. The appellate court had two questions to answer, (1) was he competent to be executed before execution of the forced medication order? They found that he wasn’t competent enough to understand the punishment…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On November 28, 2008 our office received a phone call from a distraught woman, her name was Karla Girroir. She stated her husband was in a severe car accident while driving their antique mobile home back to their house on Thanksgiving’s Eve. I listened carefully, documenting her every word as she sobbed out the facts regarding her husband’s condition. I offered to schedule an appointment as quickly as possible with Janice Fisher, our attorney. She advised me she was unable to come in because her husband had fallen into a coma and she needed to be by his side. I stayed late waiting for Janice to finish up with her other clients. I couldn’t get Mr. Girroir’s case off of my mind and I had to speak to her before I could go home. I discussed the case with Janice and she immediately called Mrs. Girroir, I acted as a translator between Janice and Mrs. Girroir as she spoke very little English and fluent Spanish. We were advised that Mrs. Girroir had no way of transportation for herself or her twin daughters to come into the office. So Janice offered to meet her at the hospital.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tarasoff vs Regents

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Issue: Whether when the therapist’s failure to warn plaintiffs of the danger to Tatiana was a breach of duty to safeguard their patient and the public?…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kent Vs Us

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kent was detained on a Receiving Home for one week. During that period, there was no arraignment and no determination by a judicial officer of the probable cause for Kent’s arrest. His attorney filed a motion with the juvenile court opposing the waiver as well as a request to inspect records relating to Kent’s previous offenses. A psychiatric examination of Kent was arranged by his attorney. His attorney argued that because his client was “a victim of severe psychopathology” it would be in Kent’s best interest to remain within the juvenile courts jurisdiction where he could receive adequate…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    THIS CAUSE having come on to be heard before the Court upon the Wife’s Complaint for Divorce, and the Husband’s Counter Complaint for Divorce, and the Court having scheduled a Final Hearing for June 17, 2012, and the parties and their respective counsel having appeared before the Court on said date, and the parties having established residency during the Final Hearing, and the Court being otherwise fully advised the premises finds that:…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Article and Law Search

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This article was about a case implicates the Georgia Regional Hospital, Atlanta. In January of 2009, a patient, Na Young, this patient has a history of psychotic episodes. This patient was released form the psychiatric hospital. On a Friday evening in January at the Regional Hospital in Atlanta, Na Yong, refused to sign the release paper. The patient go valance with the nurse and told her that she will now longer take the antipsychotic medication. The patient family pleaded the doctors and nurses to reconsider discharging her from the hospital. The patient prior to been admitted into the hospital had physically abused her mother on several occasion. Na Yong told physician and nurses that if she were discharge from the hospital she would kill her mother, which was the target of her schizophrenia-fueled rage. The hospital staff still…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In December 1973 the plaintiff, Robert Steinberg, applied for admission to the defendant, the Chicago Medical School, as a first-year student for the academic year 1974--75 and paid an application fee of $15. The Chicago Medical School is a private, not-for-profit educational institution, incorporated in the State of Illinois. His application for admission was rejected and Steinberg filed a class action against the school, claiming that it had failed to evaluate his application and those of other applicants according to the academic entrance criteria printed in the school 's bulletin. Specifically, his complaint alleged that the school 's decision to accept or reject a particular applicant for the first-year class was primarily based on such nonacademic considerations as the *806 prospective student 's familial relationship to members of the school 's faculty and to members of its board of trustees, and the ability of the applicant or his family to pledge or make payment of large sums of money to the school. The complaint further alleged that by using such unpublished criteria to evaluate applicants the school had breached the contract, which Steinberg contended was created when the school accepted his application fee.…

    • 3218 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intentional Torts

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3) In what ways did assault, battery and false imprisonment come into play in this case?…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adolescent Case Study

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages

    tall, dark brown hair, brown eyes, weighs around 200 pounds and has no known physical…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Inaffective Patient

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Patient is a young female, between 20-30 years of age, with history of schizoaffective disorder who has been hospitalized for about 3 months in an acute facility for acute mania with psychosis and disorganized/combative behavior. At first, patient refused to take medication, so a hearing was held and was deemed with an involuntary treatment commitment. Initial medications were found to be ineffective, which called for further treatment. Over the past few months, medication regimens were balanced out, patient seems to be doing much better. Patient has recently been transferred to a stepdown facility while she is waiting for placement to the State Hospital.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My Prosecution Speech

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On behalf of the people of the State of New York, and everyone connected that you have given us throughout this trial. We also thank you for your attention to this case. In a short while, when the closing arguments are over, you will return to the chambers and begin deliberations. We ask that you consider the facts and the evidence in reaching the verdict in this case. Jordan Stone is being charged with 3 things. 2nd degree assault, 2nd degree burglary, and 1st degree attempted robbery. She is being charged with these crimes because on the morning of December 10th, 2010 Jordan stone assaulted Payton Miller and attempted to take stuff from her dorm. Jordan Stone attempted burglary and in the process she assaulted my client Payton Miller and in that process Payton scratched her attacker on her arm, which you can see on Jordan Stone before you. Jordan Stone and Sydney Samuels( Payton Miller’s roommate) had a little altercation in the past which may have led the defendant to commit the crime that she did. This rivalry was because Sydney Samuels caught the defendant with her boyfriend. At the beginning of the case, during the opening statement, we said that the evidence would show that the defendant, Jordan Stone, is guilty on 3 different charges. What evidence proves her guilt? The scratch on the defendants arm also proves that Jordan Stone was indeed at the crime scene at the time the crime was being committed. Due to accurate information from our witnesses we found out that Payton Miller scratched her attacker on the arm. At the crime scene a Knicks keychain was found linking the defendant to the crime. Sydney Samuels recognizes the keychain from when they were once best friends. Sydney Samuels and Payton Miller both gave a very accurate description of the defendant. We also found Orange and blue Knicks jacket and the blue jeans worn at the time the crime was being committed. We also know that Jordan Stone…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays